Abstract
In two experiments, students were taught the hardness levels of minerals according to either a keyword-pegword mnemonic, a questioning procedure, or free study. In Experiment 1, 90 ninth-grade learning disabled students were classified as relatively higher or lower reading achievers. Mnemonic students significantly outrecalled both questioning and free-study students regardless of students' achievement level. In Experiment 2, 45 nondisabled seventh-grade students participated and again, mnemonic students significantly outperformed questioning and free study students. Both present and potential benefits of mnemonic instruction for learning disabled students are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
