Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to determine if an haptic training program to teach impulse and attention control to 12 children diagnosed communications handicapped with a secondary classification of neurological impairment could modify their encoding strategies and performance on an haptic discrimination task in the direction of increased reflectivity. The degree to which the effects of haptic training generalized to the educationally more relevant visual modality, and the durability of results for both modalities, were also examined. Significant improvements in scanning and processing times, attention deployment strategies, and response accuracy on the haptic and visual discrimination tasks observed at posttesting and at follow-up, coupled with posttraining increases in reflectivity as measured by the Matching Familiar Figures test, demonstrate the effectiveness, durability, and generalizability of haptic training. Reasons for the intervention's effectiveness in modifying LD children's impulsive cognitive tempo and attention deficits, and the practical advantages of haptic as compared to visual training, are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Argulewicz, E.N. (1982). Effects of an instructional program designed to improve attending behaviors of learning disabled students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 23–27.

Butter, E.J. (1972). Visual and haptic training and cross-modal transfer of a reflective cognitive strategy. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts/Amherst, 1971) Dissertation Abstracts International, 32(9-B), 5467–5468.

Butter, E.J. (1979). Visual and haptic training and cross-modal transfer of reflectivity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 212–219.

Digate, G. , Epstein, M. , Cullinan, D. , & Switzky, H. (1978). Modification of impulsivity: Implications for improved efficiency in learning for exceptional children. The Journal of Special Education, 12, 459–468.

Douglas, VI. (1972). Stop, look and listen: The problem of sustained attention and impulse control in hyperactive and normal children. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 4, 259–281.

Douglas, V.I. (1974). Sustained attention and impulse control: Implications for the handicapped child. In J.A. Swets & L.L. Elliott (Eds.), Psychology and the handicapped child. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Education.

Drake, D.M. (1970). Perceptual correlates of impulsive and reflective behavior, Developmental Psychology, 2, 202–214.

Keogh, B.K. , & Glover, A.T. (1980). The generality and durability of cognitive training effects. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1, 75–82.

Locher, P. , & Simmons, R.W. (1978). The influence of stimulus symmetry and complexity upon haptic scanning strategies during detection, learning, and recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 110–116.

10.

Locher, P.J. , & Worms, P.F. (1977). Visual scanning strategies of neurologically impaired, perceptually impaired, and normal children viewing the Bender-Gestali designs. Psychology in the Schools, 14, 147–157.

11.

Locher, P.J. , & Worms, P.F. (1981). Visual scanning strategies of perceptually impaired and normal children viewing the Motor-Free Visual Perception test. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 416–419.

12.

Messer, S.B. (1976). Reflection-impulsivity: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1026–1052.

13.

Reid, D.K. , & Hresko, W.P. (1981). A cognitive approach to learning disabilities. New York: McGraw-Hill.

14.

Vaughan, J. (1983). Saccadic reaction time in visual search. In K. Rayner , Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes. New York: Academic Press.

Use of Haptic Training to Modify Impulse and Attention Control Deficits of Learning Disabled Children

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References