Distractibility in Learning-Disabled Children

Abstract

Learning-disabled (LD) children are thought to be deficient in attention and memory performance, especially selective attention in the presence of distracting information. However, these findings have not always been confirmed and when these differential distraction effects are found they may be an artifact of the tasks' differential abilities to detect differences between groups. Two-digit span tasks were used to compare distraction performance of LD and normal learning (NL) children. On the first set of tasks, where the nondistraction and distraction conditions were matched, a priori for their ability to discriminate differences between groups, no differential distraction effect was found. In the second pair of tasks, the distraction condition was designed to make it more discriminating than the nondistraction condition and a differential distraction effect was found. These results are discussed in terms of the need for researchers to consider the psychometric properties of their tasks as important variables and as another potential explanation for some of the disparate findings in the distractibility literature with LD children.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Ford, C. E. , Pelham, W. E. , and Ross, A. O. The role of selective attention and rehearsal in the auditory short term memory task performance of poor and normal readers. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Browning, R. M. Effect of irrelevant peripheral visual stimuli on discrimination learning in minimally brain damaged children. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1967, 31, 371–376.

Chapman, L. J. & Chapman, J. P. Problems in the measurement of cognitive deficit. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 79, 380–385.

Clampit, M. K. Residual attention deficits in adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1981, 14, 218–219.

Dykman, R. A. , Walls, R. C. , Suzuki, T. , Ackerman, P. , & Peters, J. E. Children with learning disabilities: Conditioning, differentiation, and the effect of distraction. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1970, 40, 766–782.

Hagen, J. W. The effect of distraction on selective attention. Child Development, 1967, 38, 685–694.

Hallahan, D. P. & Reeve, R. E. Selective attention and distractibility. In B. K. Keogh [Ed.], Advances-in special education. N.Y.: JA1 Press, 1980.

Koppell, S. Testing the attention deficit notion. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979, 12, 43–48.

Lasky, E. Z. , & Tobin, H. Linguistic and non-linguistic competing auditory messages. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1973, 6, 243–250.

10.

Lord, F. M. The relation of the reliability of multiple choice tests to the distribution of item difficulties. Psychometrica, 1952, 17, 181–194.

11.

Oltmanns, T. F. , & Neale, J. M.

Schizophrenic performance when distractors are present: Attention deficit or differential task difficulty?

Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 1975, 84, 205–209.

12.

Pelham, W. E. Selective attention deficits in poor readers? Dichotic listening, speeded classification, and auditory and visual central and incidental learning tasks. Child Development, 1979, 50, 1050–1061.

13.

Pelham, W. E. , & Ross, A. O. Selective attention in children with reading problems: A developmental study of incidental learning. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1977, 5, 1–8.

14.

Tarver, S. G. , Hallahan, D. P. , Cohen, S. B. , & Kauffman, J. M. The development of visual selective attention and verbal rehearsal in learning disabled boys. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1977, 10, 491–500.

15.

Tarver, S. G. , Hallahan, D. P. , Kauffman, J. M. , & Ball, D. W. Verbal rehearsal and selective attention in children with learning disabilities: A developmental lag. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1976, 22, 375–385.