Many disabled readers decode text in a word-by-word fashion and consequently have difficulty understanding what they read. This failure is often attributed to their inability to focus attention simultaneously on decoding and comprehending the message. However, this undesirable outcome can be avoided through the method of repeated readings. By having children reread a passage until fluency is achieved, their attention can be focused on comprehension, and improved understanding will result.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1. Dahl, P., & Samuels, S.J.A mastery based experimental program for teaching poor readers high speed word recognition skills. Unpublished manuscript, 1974.
2.
2. Schreiber, P.Theoretical observations on the method of repeated readings. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1980.
3.
Brutten, S., Richardson, S., & Mangel, C.Something's Wrong With My Child. New York: Harcourt Brace & Jovanovitch, Inc., 1973.
4.
Carbo, M.Teaching reading with talking books. The Reading Teacher, 1978, 32, 267–273.
5.
Chomsky, C.When you still can't read in third grade: After decoding, what? In S.J. Samuels (Ed.), What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction. Newark: International Reading Association, 1978.
6.
Embrey, E.A study on the effectiveness of the neurological impress method as a remedial reading technique. Unpublished master's thesis, Central Washington State College, 1968.
7.
Gonzales, P., & Elijah, D.Rereading: Effect on error patterns and performance levels on the IRI. The Reading Teacher, 1975, 28, 647–652.
Hendrickson, J., Roberts, M., & Shores, R.Antecedent and contingent modeling to teaching basic sight vocabulary to learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1978, 11, 69–73.
10.
Hollingsworth, P.An Experiment with the impress method of teaching reading. The Reading Teacher, 1970, 24, 112–114.
11.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S.J.Toward a theory of automatic information processing. Cognitive Psychology, 1974, 6, 293–323.
12.
Langford, K., Slade, K., & Barnett, A.An examination of the impress technique in remedial reading. Academic Therapy, 1974, 9, 303–309.
13.
Lorenz, L., & Vockell, E.Using the neurological impress method with learning disabled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979, 12, 420–422.
14.
Marlowe, W., Egner, K., & Foreman, D.Story comprehension as a function of modality and reading ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979, 12, 61–64.
15.
Samuels, S.J.The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 1979, 32, 403–408.
16.
Semel, E., & Wiig, E.Comprehension of syntactic structures and critical verbal elements by children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1975, 8, 53–58.
17.
Torgeson, J.The role of nonspecific factors in the task performance of learning disabled children: A theoretical assessment. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1977, 10, 33–40.
18.
Torgeson, J.Conceptual and educational implications of the use of efficient task strategies by learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980, 13, 1926.
19.
Torgeson, J. & Goldman, T.Rehearsal and short-term memory in reading disabled children. Child Development, 1977, 48, 56–60.
20.
Vogel, S.Syntactic Abilities in Normal and Dyslexic Children. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1975.
21.
Weinstein, R., & Rabinovitch, M.Sentence structure and retention in good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971, 62, 25–30.
