Glass, G.Minimum competence and incompetence in Florida. Phi Delta Kappan, 1978, 59, (9), 602–604.
14.
Hart, G.The California pupil proficiency law as viewed by its author. Phi Delta Kappan, 1978, 59, (9), 592–596.
15.
Harnisch, D., & Linn, R.Analysis of item response patterns: Questionable test data and dissimilar curriculum practices. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1981, 18, (3), 133–146.
16.
Higgins, S., & Hockenberry, C.Policy Options Regarding Graduation Requirements and Their Impact on Handicapped Students. Reston, Va.: The Council for Exceptional Children, 1979.
17.
Idstein, P.Measurement Rushes in where curriculum shouldn't fear to tread. Center on Evaluation, Development, and Research Quarterly, 1980, 13, (3), 7–8.
18.
Keillor, G. Prarie Home Companion. National Public Radio broadcast each Saturday [and well worth listening to].
19.
Kirsch, I., & Gunthrie, J.Construct validity of functional reading tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1980, 17, (2), 81–93.
20.
Koffler, S.A comparison of approaches for setting proficiency standards. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1980, 17, (3), 167–178.
Pullin, D.Minimum competency testing and the demand for accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 1981, 63, (1), 20–23.
28.
Partridge, A.The attack on teacher education in historical perspective. Journal of Research Services: Colorado State College Bulletin, 1964, 44, (8), 3–13.
29.
Turlington, R.Florida's testing program: A firm foundation for improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 1981, 63, (3), 204–205.
30.
Wise, A.Minimum competency testing: Another case of hyper-rationalization. Phi Delta Kappan, 1978, 59, (9), 596–599.
31.
Wirtz, W., et al.On further examination: Report of the advisory panel on the Scholastic Aptitude Test score decline. New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 1977.