The basic assumptions underlying the development of early identification procedures are reviewed. The effectiveness of screening measures designed to identify educationally “at risk” children is critically examined. It is concluded that there is a general lack of evidence for the usefulness of such instruments. The implications of these findings are considered, and an alternative strategy of action based on the use of sequences of educational objectives rather than predictive instruments is proposed.
2. Leach, D., Morgan, R. County screening project 1975–1977: A provisional report. Unpublished manuscript, Hereford, and Worcestershire Psychological Service, England, 1978.
3.
Alberman, E., & Goldstein, H.The ‘at risk’ register: A statistical evaluation. British Journal of Preventative and Social Medicine, 1970, 34, 129
4.
Ames, S.G., Becker, L.D., & Dalton, S.The predictive validity of the Stanford Early School Achievement Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977, 37, 505–507.
5.
Ainscow, M., & Tweddle, D., Preventing Classroom Failure: An Objectives Approach. Chichester: J. Wiley, 1979.
6.
Bailey, T., & Roger, C.Screening diagnosis and prescription: An infant reading check. Association of Educational Psychologists Journal, 1979, 5(1), 47–56.
7.
Bryan, T., & McGrady, M.The use of a teacher rating scale. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1972, 5, 199–206.
8.
Burns, W., & Burns, K.The Slingerland Screening Tests: Local norms. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1977, 10, 450–454.
9.
Buttram, J., Covert, R., & Hayes M.Prediction of school readiness and early grade achievement by classroom teachers. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976, 36, 543–546.
10.
Carver, R.The case against statistical significance. Harvard Educational Review, 1978, 48, 378–399.
11.
Colligan, R.Concurrent validity of the Myklebust Pupil Rating Scale in a kindergarten population. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1977, 10, 317–320.
12.
Colligan, R.Predictive utility of the Myklebust Pupil Rating Scale: A two-year follow-up, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979, 12, 264–267.
13.
Cornwall, K.The development of a screening technique. Some reflections on four years' experience in one local authority. Occasional Papers of the Division of Educational and Child Psychology, 1979, 3(1), 3–10.
14.
Clarke, A.D.B.Predicting human development: Problems, evidence, implications. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 1978, 31, 249–258.
15.
Davie, R., Butler, N., & Goldstein, H.From Birth to Seven. London: Longmans, 1972.
16.
Day, J., & Wedell, K.Visual and auditory memory in spelling: An exploratory study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972, 42, 33–39.
17.
De Hirsch, K., Jansky, J., & Langford, W. Predicting Reading Failure. 1966.
18.
Department of Education & Science. Children with specific reading disabilities. London: Advisory Committee on Handicapped Children. HMSO, 1972.
19.
Department of Education & Science. A Language for Life: The Bullock Report. London: HMSO, 1975.
20.
Department of Education & Science. Special Educational Needs: The Warnock Report. London: HMSO, 1978.
21.
Douglas, J.E., & Sulton, A.The development of speech and mental processes in a pair of twins: A case study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1978, 19, 49–56.
22.
Esies, G., Harris, J., Moers, F., & Wodrich, D.Predictive validity of the Boehm Test of Basic Concepts for achievement in first grade. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976, 36, 1031–1035.
23.
Evans, R.The development and evaluation of some techniques used to predict educational handicap in the primary school. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Swansea, Wales, 1973.
Evans, R., & Ferguson, N.Screening school entrants. Association of Educational Psychologists Journal, 1974, 3(6), 2–9.
26.
Evans, R., Davies, P., Ferguson, N., & Williams, P.Swansea Evaluation Profiles for School Entrants. Slough: NFER, 1979.
27.
Ferguson, N.The perceptual, motor, and language skills of school entrants in deprived areas. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Cardiff, 1972.
28.
Feshbach, S., Adelman, M., & Fuller, W.Early identification of children with high risk of reading failure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1974, 7, 639–644.
29.
Gardner, J., & Tweddle, D.Some guidelines for sequencing objectives. Association of Educational Psychologists Journal, 1979, 5(2), 23–30.
30.
Gray, D., & Reeve, J.Ordinary schools: Some special help. Special Education, 1978, 5, 25–27.
31.
Hartlage, L., & Lucas, D.Predicting reading ability in first grade children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1972, 34, 447–450.
32.
Hartlage, L., & Lucas, D.Group screening for reading disability in first grade children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1973, 6, 317–321.
33.
Hayes, M., Mason, E. & Covert, R.Validity and reliability of a simple device for readiness screening. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1975, 35, 495–498.
34.
Hindley, C., & Owen, CThe extent of individual changes in 1Q for ages between 6 months and 17 years in a British longitudinal sample. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1978, 19, 329–350.
35.
Kagan, J.Change and Continuity in Infancy. Chichester: J. Wiley, 1971.
36.
Keogh, B., & Becker, L.Early detection of learning problems: Questions, cautions and guidelines. Exceptional Children, 1973, 40, 5–11.
37.
Koluchova, J.The further study of twins after severe and prolonged deprivation: A second report. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1976, 17, 181–189.
38.
Lawrence, D., & Blagg, N.Somerset Developmental Checklist. London: Good Reading Ltd., 1977.
39.
Leach, D., & Morgan, R.County screening project 1975–1977: A provisional report. Unpublished paper, Hereford and Worcestershire Psychological Service, England, 1978.
40.
Lewis, A.The early identification of children with learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Difficulties, 1980, 13, 102–108.
Lindsay, G.The early identification of learning difficulties. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Birmingham, England, 1974.(a)
43.
Lindsay, G.The early identification of learning difficulties and the monitoring of children's progress. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Birmingham, England, 1979.(a).
44.
Lindsay, G.The Infant Rating Scale: Some evidence on its validity from a selected sample of children. Occasional Papers of Division of Educational and Child Psychology, 1979, 3(2), 27–37. (b)
45.
Lindsay, G.The Infant Rating Scale. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980, 50, 97–104(a).
46.
Lindsay, G.Monitoring children's learning: An in-service approach. British Journal of In-service Education, 1980, 6(3), 189–191. (b)
Lindsay, G., & Pearson, L.S.Early Identification and Intervention: School Based Approaches. Oxford, England: TRC (Publishing), 1981.
49.
McCall, R., Appelbaum, M., & Hogarty P.Developmental changes in mental performance. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1973, 38 (3).
50.
McCandless, B.Review of the Boehm Test of Basic Concepts. In O.K. Buros, Seventh Mental Measurements Yearbook. New York: Gryphon, 1972.
51.
Makins, V. Bullock plus one. Times Educational Supplement, Feb. 6, 1976, pp. 21–23.
52.
Margolis, M.The kindergarten auditory screening test as a predictor of reading disability. Psychology in the Schools, 1976, 13, 399–403.
53.
Marshall, C., & Gilliland, J.Early identification of children in need. Occasional Papers of the Division of Educational and Child Psychology, 1975, 9, 392–400.
54.
Meehl, P., & Rosen, A.Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 1955, 52, 194–216.
55.
Merenda, P., Bonaventura, E., & Novack, H.An intensive study of the reliability of the Rhode Island Pupil Identification Scale. Psychology in the Schools, 1977, 14, 282–289.
56.
Mitchell, R.Editorial: Changing concepts of risk. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1975, 17, 277–278.
57.
Morgan, R.A study of the relative contribution of language skills and visual perception skills to the reading process. Unpublished master's thesis. University of Birmingham, England, 1977.
Neligan, G., Prudham, D., & Steiner, H.The Formative Years. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1974.
60.
Neligan, G., Kolvin, G., Scott, A., & Garside, R.Born Too Soon, or Born Too Small. Spastics International, 1976.
61.
Novack, H., Bonaventura, E., & Merenda, P.Manual for the Rhode Island Pupil Identification Scale. Providence, R.I.: Authors, 1972.
62.
Novack, H., Bonaventura, E., & Merenda, P.A scale for the early selection of children with learning problems. Exceptional Children, 1973, 40, 98–104.
63.
Novack, H., Bonaventura, E., & Merenda, P.Factorial structure of the Rhode Island Pupil Identification Scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills., 1976, 43, 75–82.
64.
Pihl, R. O., & Nagy, K.A.The applicability of the Myklebust Pupil Rating Scale. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1980, 13, 109–113.
65.
Powers, S.The validity of the Vane Kindergarten Test in predicting achievement in Kindergarten and first grade. Educational and Psychological Measurement., 1974, 34, 1003–1007.
66.
Proger, B.Test review No. 7: Screening tests for identifying children with specific language disability. Journal of Special Education, 1971, 5, 293–299.
67.
Rawsthorne, K.A procedure for screening children in their final year in the infant school. Unpublished Dip. Spec. Ed. (ESN) thesis, University of Birmingham, England, 1967.
68.
Rogers, M.Early recognition of handicapping disorders in children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1971, 13, 80–101.
69.
Rutter, M., Tizard, J., & Whitmore, K.Education. Health and Behaviour. London: Longmans. 1970.
70.
Sheridan, M.Infants at risk of handicapping conditions. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and Public Health Laboratory Service, 1962, 21, 238–245.
71.
Satz, P., & Fletcher, J.Early screening tests: Some uses and abuses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979, 12, 56–59.
72.
Smith, I., Wolff, O. Phenylketonuria Register Newsletter No. 5, February 1978, Medical Research Council/Department of Health and Social Security. London, England.
73.
Tansley, A.Special educational treatment in infam schools: A 6-1/2 year old screening. In K. Wedell & E. Raybould. (Eds.), The Early Identification of Educationally ‘At Risk’ Children. Educational Review Occasional Publication No. 6. University of Birmingham, England, 1976.
74.
Torgeson, J.What shall we do with psychological processes?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979, 12, 514–521.
75.
Wedell, K.Early Identification and compnesatory interaction. In R. Knight, & D. Bakker. Treatment of Hyperactive and Learning Disordered Children: Current Research. Baimore. University Press. 1980.
76.
Wolfendale, S.Screening and early identification of reading and learning difficulties–a description of the Croydon Screening Procedures. In K. Wedell, & E. Raybould, (Eds.), The Early Identification of Educationally ‘At Risk’ Children. Educational Review Occasional Publication No. 6. University of Birmingham, England, 1976.
77.
Wolfendale, S., & Bryan, T.Identification of Learning Difficulties. Stafford, England: National Association for Remedial Education, 1979.
