Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The present study evaluated and compared the knowledge and application of selected syntactic rules for forming (1) spatial, temporal, and idiomatic prepositional phrases, (2) pronominalization, (3) reflexivization, and (4) relativization in 26 learning disabled and 13 academically achieving college students. The experimental test battery contained seven written, multiple-choice tests, six of which were designed by Quigley (1971). The LD college students performed significantly poorer than their controls on tasks requiring (1) application of the selectional rules for reflexive pronouns plural, (2) recognition of the grammaticality of relativized sentences, (3) resolution of relativized sentences into their component sentences, and synthesis of component sentences into relativized sentences. The present findings suggest that syntactic deficits may persist among LD young adults who have achieved college status. They further suggest that the deficits in acquiring the rules for forming complex sentence transformations do not recover spontaneously among these young adults as a function of age related maturational processes or exposure to more advanced reading materials.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Fries, C.C. , The structure of English: an introduction to the construction of English sentences . New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich , 1952.

Goldstein, K. , Language and language disorders. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1948.

Hass, WA , & Wepman, J.A. , Dimensions of individual difference in the spoken syntax of school children . Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1974, 17, 455-469.

Huxley, R. , The development of the correct use of subject personal pronouns in two children . In G.B. Flores D'Arcais & W. J.M. Levelt (Eds) Advances in psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1970.

Johnson, D.J. , & Myklebust, H.R. , Learning disabilities: educational principles and practices. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1967.

Quigley, S.P. , Rationale for the construction of the test of syntactic ability. (Experimental edition). Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Institute for Research on Exceptional Children, 1971.

Quigley, S.P. , Smith, N.L. , & Wilbur, R.B. , Comprehension of relativized sentences by deaf students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1974, 17, 325-341.

Semel, E.M. , & Wiig, E.H. , Comprehension of syntactic structures and critical verbal elements by children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 1975, 8, 53-58.

Wiig, E.H. , Lapointe, C. , & Semel, E.M. , Relationships among language processing and production abilities of learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 1977, 10, 292-299.

10.

Wiig, E.H. & Roach, M.A. , Immediate recall of semantically varied "sentences" by learning disabled adolescents . Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1975, 40, 119-125.

11.

Wiig, E.H. , & Semel, E.M. , Comprehension of linguistic concepts requiring logical operations by learning disabled children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research , 1973, 16, 627-636.

12.

Wiig, E.H. , & Semel, E.M. , Logico-grammatical sentence comprehension by learning disabled adolescents . Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1974, 38, 1331-1334.

13.

Wiig, E.H. , & Semel, E.M. , Productive language abilities in learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1975, 8, 578-586.

14.

Wiig S. H., & Semel, E.M. , Language disabilities of children and adolescents. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill, 1976.

15.

Wiig, E.H. , Semel, E.M. , & Crouse, M.A.B. , The use of morphology by high-risk and learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1973, 6, 457-465.

16.

Wilbur, R.B. , Montanelli, D.S. , & Quigley, S.P. , Pronominalization in the language of deaf students. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1976, 19, 120-140.

17.

Winer, B.J. , Statistical principles in experimental design. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1971.

Prepositional Phrases,Pronominalization,Reflexivization,and Relativization in the Language of Learning Disabled College Students

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References