Askov, E.N., Greff, K.N., Handwriting: Copying versus tracing as the most effective type of practice . Journal of Educational Research, 1975, 69, 96-98.
2.
Beery, K., Buktenica, N., Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration. Chicago : Follett Publishing Co., 1967.
3.
Brigham, T.A., Finfrock, S.R., Breunig, K., Bushell, D., The use of programmed materials in the analysis of academic contingencies . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1972 , 5, 177-182.
4.
Carter, J.L., Synolds, D., Effects of relaxation training upon handwriting quality. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1974, 7, 236-238.
5.
Colarusso, R., Hammill, D.D., Motor-Free Visual Perception Test. San Rafael, Calif.: Academic Therapy Publications, 1972.
6.
Dixon, W.J., Massey, F.J., Introduction to Statistical Analysis. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1969.
7.
Enstrom, E.A., Enstrom, D.C., Teaching for greater legibility. Elementary English , 1964, 41, 859-862.
8.
Frostig, M., Lefever, W., Whittlesey, J., Administration and Scoring Manual for the Marianne Frostig Developmental Test of Visual Perception, Revised. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1966.
9.
Furner, B.A., The perceptual-motor nature of learning in handwriting. Elementary English, 1969, 46, 886-894.
10.
Furner, B.A., An analysis of the effectiveness of a program of instruction emphasizing the perceptual-motor nature of learning in handwriting. Elementary English, 1970, 47, 61-69. (a)
11.
Fumer, B.A., Recommended instructional procedures in a method emphasizing the perceptual-motor nature of learning in handwriting. Elementary English, 1970, 47, 1021-1030. (b)
12.
Gerard, J.A., Use of a task analysis model for diagnosis and remediation of handwriting problems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston College , 1978.
13.
Harris, T.L., Herrick, V.E., Children's perception of the handwriting task. In V.E. Herrick, (Ed)., New Horizons for Research in Handwriting . Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press, 1963, pp.159-179.
14.
Hirsch, E., Neidermeyer, F.C., Effects of tracing prompts and discrimination training on kindergarten handwriting performance. Journal of Educational Research, 1973, 67, 81-86.
15.
Hopkins, B.L., Schutte, R.C., Garton, K.L., The effects of access to a playroom on the rate and quality of printing and writing of first and second grade students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1971, 4, 77-87.
Lewis, E.R., Lewis, H.P., Which manuscript letters are hard for first graders?Elementary English, 1964, 41, 855-858.
19.
Miller, R.J., Junkala, J., Nutter, R.E., Ellis, L.F., Teachers Guide for Exceptional Children and Youth. U.S. Dependent Schools, European Area. The Institute for the Study of Mental Retardation and Related Disabilities. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan, 1973.
20.
Noble, J.K., and Handwriting Research Institute.Better Handwriting for You. Books 1-6. Sacramento, Calif. : California State Department of Education, 1967.
21.
Tagatz, G.E., Otto, W., Klausmeier, H.J., Goodwin, W.L., Cook, D.M., Effect of three methods of instruction upon the handwriting performance of third and fourth graders. In W. Otto , K. Koenke (Eds.), Remedial Teaching: Research and Comment. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin , 1969, pp. 234-239.
22.
Zazlow, R.W., Reversals in children as a function of mid-line body orientation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1966, 57, 133-139.