In this study 40 normal and 40 learning disabled children classified by age (5 and 6) and level of auditory discrimination (impaired and normal) were tested for language ability using an elicited imitation paradigm. Learning disabled children exhibited more errors, had more difficulty extracting the semantic componeant from the model sentence, and gave more reformulations than normal children. Results supported a deficit hypothesis in regard to the learning disabled child's language rather than a deviancy hypothesis. In addition, the elicited imitation technique was found to be inappropriate for children with impaired auditory discrimination ability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brown, R., A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1973.
2.
Chalfant, J.C., Scheffelin, M.A. (eds.), Central Processing Dysfunctions in Children: A Review of Research, Phase III (NINDS Monograph No. 9). Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1969.
3.
Chase, R.A., Neurological aspects of language disorders in children. In J.V. Irwin, M. Marge (eds.), Principles of Childhood Language Disorders. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1972.
4.
Clay, M. M., Sentence repetition: Elicited imitation of a controlled set of syntactic structures by four language groups. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1971, 36(3, Serial No. 143).
5.
Critchley, M., The Dyslexic Child. London: William Neinemann (Medical Books), 1970.
6.
Dunn, L., Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Service, Inc., 1965.
7.
Finn, J.D., A General Model for Multivariate Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, Inc., 1974.
8.
Goldman, R., Fristoe, N., Woodcock, R.W., The Goldman-Fristoe-Woodcock Test of Auditory Discrimination. Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Service, Inc., 1970.
9.
Kinsbourne, M., Minimal brain dysfunction as a neurodevelopmental lag. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1973, 205, 268-273.
10.
McCoulskey, M., sSentence repetition ability of children with language and/or learning disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, 1971.
11.
Menyuk, P., Looney, P., A problem of language disorder: Length versus structure. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1972, 15, 264-279. (a)
12.
Menyuk, P., Looney, P., Relationships between components of the grammar in language disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1972, 15, 395-406. (b)
13.
Newcombe, F., Marshall, J.C., Immediate recall of sentences by subjects with unilateral cerebral lesions. Neuropsychologia, 1967, 5, 329-334.
14.
Sabatino, D., Auditory perception: Development, assessment, and intervention. In L. Mann, D. Schatino (eds.). The First Review of Special Education, (Vol. 1). Philadelphia: Buttonwood Farms Inc., 1973.
15.
Slobin, D.I., Welsh, C.A., Elicited imitation as a research tool in developmental psycholinguistics. In C. Ferguson, D. Slobin (eds.), Studies of Child Language Development, New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, Inc., 1973, 485-497.
16.
Vogel, S.A., Syntactic abilities in normal and dyslexic children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1974, 7(2), 103-109.
17.
Wiig, E.H., Roach, M.A., Immediate recall of semantically varied “sentences” by learning disabled adolescents. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1975, 40, 119-125.
18.
Wiig, E.H., Seme, E.M., Language Disabilities in Children and Adolescents. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill, 1976.
19.
Young, S., Preliminary investigation of sentence repetition ability in children with language and learning disabilities. Uapublished master's thesis. University of Texas, 1971.
