This study reintroduces a historically old question: Of what relevance is brain dysfunction to educational planning? It has been widely accepted in educational circles that the brain's physical integrity is not relevant as the child still must be educated. Adams demonstrates that optimal educational programs may need to take into account brain status. — G.M.S.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, J.: Clinical neuropsychology and the study of learning disorders. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 1973, 20, 587-598.
2.
Baker, G.P., and Raskin, L.M.: Sensory integration in the learning disabled. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1973, 10, 53-57.
3.
Benton, A.L.: Problems of test construction in the field of aphasia. Cortex , 1967, 3, 32-58.
4.
Dubey, D.R.: Organic factors in hyperkinesis: A critical evaluation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 1976, 46, 353-366.
5.
Gaines, B.J., and Raskin, L.M.: Comparison of cross-modal and intramodal form recognition in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 1970, 3, 243-246.
6.
Raskin, L.M., and Baker, G.P.: Tactual and visual integration in the learning processes: Research and implication . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1975, 8, 108-112.
7.
Raskin, L.M., and Schoonover, D.: Sensory integration in preschool children. Paper presented at Eastern Psychological Association Meeting, Boston, April 1972.
8.
Strauss, A.A., and Lehtinen, L.: Psychopathology and Education of the Brain Injured Child. Vol. 1. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1947.
