Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

It is suggested that identification of learning disabilities be divided into two stages, screening and clinical diagnosis, to permit more effective use of clinical resources. The sequential revision of the probability that a child has learning disability based on data about the child and implemented by Bayes' rule is proposed as an efficient screening method. Forty component disabilities, potential data for screening, were selected and classified. For want of objective data, subjective estimates of the relatedness of these disabilities and their statistical prevalence among children with and without learning disability (quantities needed for the Bayesian revision) were obtained from specialists in this field. Some of the disabilities were found to be potentially highly diagnostic and relatively independent and could be used for identification.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bruce, R.A. , and Yarnall, S.R. : Computer-aided diagnosis of cardiovascular disorder. J. Chronic Dis., 1966, 19, 473–484.

DeRuiter, J.A. : A Bayesian approach to the use of test data for the identification of learning disability in school-age children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Arizona, 1973.

Deshler, D.D. : Learning disability in the high school student as demonstrated in monitoring of self-generated and externally-generated errors. Unpubl. doctoral dissertation. Univ. of Arizona, 1974.

Edwards, W. : Subjective probabilities inferred from decisions. Psychol. Rev., 1962, 69, 109–135.

Edwards, W. : Introduction: special issue on revision of opinions by men and man-machine systems. In IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-7, 1966, 1–6.

Edwards, W. , Lindman, H. , and Savage, L. : Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychol. Rev., 1963, 70, 193–242.

Gustafson, D.H. : Evaluation of probabilistic information processing in medical decision making. Org. Behav. Human Performance, 1969, 4, 20–31.

Gustafson, D.H., et al. : Subjective probabilities in medical diagnosis. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, MMS-10, 1969, 61–65.

Johnson, M.K. : An experimental methodology using educational judgment with Bayesian algebra applied to learning disability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Unv. of Arizona, 1973.

10.

Kaiser, C.J. : Theoretical positions and Bayesian estimations of learning disability specialists. Unpublished doctoial dissertation, Univ. of Arizona, 1974.

11.

Kass, C.E. (Ed.): Final Report, Advanced Institute for Leadership Personnel in Learning Disabilities. Tucson, Ariz.: Dept. of Spec. Educ, Univ. of Arizona, 1970.

12.

Kass, C.E. : Theories of learning disabilities. Unpublished class notes, Univ. of Arizona, 1972-73.

13.

Lichtenstein, S. : Conditional nonindependence of data in a practical Bayesian decision task. Org. Behav. & Human Performance, 1972, 8, 21–25.

14.

Lindley, D.V. : Bayesian Statistics, A Review. Philadelphia: Soc. Industrial and Applied Math., 1971.

15.

Minskoff, J.G. , and Lokerson, J. (Eds.): Preliminary Report to the U.S. Office of Education: Institute for Advanced Leadership Training. New Haven, Conn.: Southern Conn. State University, in press.

16.

Overall, J.E. , and Williams, C.M. : Conditional probability for diagnosis of thyroid function. J. Amer. Med. Assn., 1963, 183, 307–313.

17.

Toronto, A.F. , Veasey, L.G. , and Warner, H.R. : Evaluation of a computer program for diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Prog. Cardiov. Dis., 1963, 5, 362–377.

18.

Wissink, J. : A procedure for the identification of children with learning disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univ. of Arizona, 1972.

A Bayesian Approach to the Identification of Children with Learning Disabilities

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References