Visual-Spatial Organization and Reading

Abstract

In an intact class of grade two children, cognitive spatial ability was better than the children's visual-perceptual ability in differentiating good from poorer readers. The visual-perceptual skills measured by the Frostig test were insufficient for advanced reading at the grade two level and an unnecessary requirement for high reading ability. The results suggest that perceptual-motor training will be the most effective when used preventively rather than remedially and when the programs are implemented during the early years of development at the time the child is in Piaget's preoperational stage. The study supported an alternate theoretical framework for understanding the relationship of visual-perceptual deficits and reading. In addition, it provided initial instructional procedures that can be used in teaching important cognitive, visual-spatial abilities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Almy, E. & Miller, P. : Young Children's Thinking: Studies of Some Aspects of Piaget's Theory, New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University, 1966.

Elkind, D. ; Horn, Y. ; & Schneider, G. : Modified word recognition, reading achievement and perceptual decentration. J. Genet. Psychol., 1969; 107, 235–251.

Engelmann; S. & Bruner, E. : Distar Reading 1: An Instructional System. Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1969.

Frostig, M. : Marianne Frostig Developmental Test of Visual Perception. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1966.

Frostig, M. & Home, D. : The Frostig Program for the Development of Visual Perception. Chicago: Follett, 1964.

Gates, A.I. ; MacGinitie, W.H. : Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests. New York: Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1964.

Ginsburg, G. & Hartwick, A. : Directional confusion as a sign of dyslexia. Percept. Motor Skills, 1971; 32, 535–543.

Hammill, D. : Training visual perceptual processes. J. Learning Disabil., 1972; 5, 552–562.

Kershner, J. : Conservation of vertical-horizontal space perception in trainable retarded children. Amer. J. Ment. Defic, 1973; 77, 710–716.

10.

Kershner, J. : Ethnic group differences in children's ability to reproduce direction and orientation. J. Soc. Psychol., 1972; 88, 3–13.

11.

Kershner, J.: Psychoeducational diagnosis of learning disorders: A cognitive perspective presented at the Amer. Psychol. Assoc, Miami, 1970.

12.

Kershner, J. Relationship of motor development to visual-spatial cognitive growth. J. Special Educ., 8: 1, 1974, 91–102.

13.

Klees, M. & Lebrun, A. : Analysis of the figurative and operative processes of thought of 40 dyslexic children. J. Learning Disabil., 1972; 5, 389–396.

14.

Keogh, B. & Donlon, G. : Field dependence, impulsivity, and learning disabilities. J. Learning Disabil., 1972; 5, 331–336.

15.

Meikle, S. & Kilpatrick, D. : Changes in perceptual motor and reading test scores. Canad. Psychol., 1971; 12, 254–269.

16.

Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. : The Child's Conception of Space. New York: Norton, 1967.

17.

Serwer, B. ; Shapiro, B. ; and Shapiro, P. : The comparative effectiveness of four methods of instruction on the achievement of children with specific learning disabilities. The J. Spe. Educ., 1973; 7, 241–249.

18.

Thorndike, R.L. et al.: Canadian Cognitive Abilities Test. Canada: Thomas Nelson & Sons, 1970.

19.

Webb, R. : Is movement necessary in the development of cognition? Ment. Retard., 1971; 8, 16–18.

20.

Winer, B. : Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962, 90–91.