This essay explores those factors deemed relevant to cross-cultural testing situations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerS.: International verbal communications.Logos, Oct. 1960. 3(2), 96–99.
2.
AdlerS.: Dialectal differences: professional and clinical implications.J. Speech and Hearing Disorders, Dec. 1971. 36(1), 90–100.
3.
AlienV.: Psychological Factors in Poverty.Chicago: Markham, 1970.
4.
BaumanR.: An ethnographic framework for the investigation of communicative behaviors.Asha, June 1971, 13(6), 334–40.
5.
CazdenC.: The neglected situation in child language research and education. In: WilliamsF. (Ed.), Language and Poverty.Chicago: Markham, 1970.
6.
FishmanJ.: Guidelines for testing minority group children.J. Social Issues, 1964, 2(20), 129–45.
7.
GrimshawW.: Language as an obstacle and as data in sociologic research.Items, Social Science Research Council, June 1969.
8.
JensenA.: Environment, heredity, and intelligence. Harvard Educ. Review Reprint Series No. 2, 1969, p. 100.
9.
LabovW.: The logic of nonstandard English. In: AlatisJ. (Ed.), Report of the 20th Annual Round Table Meeting of Linguistics and Language Studies.Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Univ. Press, 1970.
10.
RobertsE.: An evaluation of standardized tests and tools for the measurement of language development.Language Research Foundation, M.I.T., 1971.
11.
SeversonR., and GuestK.: Toward the standardized assessment of the language of disadvantaged children. In: WilliamsF. (Ed.), Language and Poverty.Chicago: Markham, 1970.
12.
WilliamsL.: On the contribution of the linguist to institutional racism. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Convention, San Francisco, Calif., 1969.
