Twenty-seven boys with serious learning and behavioral disorders and 25 boys with moderate learning problems were evaluated in terms of constructs of “field dependence-independence” and “reflection-impulsivity” using a portable rod and frame test, a pattern walking test, and the Matching Familiar Figures Test. Compared to available normative data for normal-achieving children, LD boys were found to be highly field dependent; extreme LD boys were also impulsive. Field dependence associated with rapid response rate appears incompatible with success in most educational tasks. Analysis of children's perceptual and cognitive styles is proposed as a tentative but promising approach to understanding the educational problems of LD children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Canavan, D.: Field dependence in children as a function of grade, sex, and ethnic group membership. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1969.
2.
Clements, S.D. and Peters, J.E.: Minimal brain dysfunction in the school-age child. Arch. of General Psychiatry, 1962, 6, 17–29.
3.
Davis, J. K.: Concept identification of the functioning of cognitive style complexity and training procedures. Technical Report 32, Wisconsin R and D Center for Learning, Univ. of Wisc. 1967.
4.
de Hirsch, K.: Tests designed to discover potential reading difficulties at the six year old level. Amer. J. of Orthopsychiatry, 1957, 27, 570-571.
Frostig, M.: Visual perception in the brain-injured child. Amer. J. of Orthopsychiatry, 1963, 33, 665–671.
7.
Gerard, H.: Factors contributing to adjustment and achievement. Progress report of a joint project of Riverside Unified School District and Univ. of Calif., Riverside, May 1969.
8.
Gill, N.T., Herdtner, T.J., and Lough, L.: Perceptual and socioeconomic variables, instruction in body-orientation, and predictal academic success in young children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968, 26, 1175–1184.
9.
Hirsch, J.: The relationship between two dimensions of cognitive style and locus of control in eight to ten year old boys. Unpublished masters thesis, Univ. of Calif.1969.
10.
Kagan, J.: Reflection-impulsivity and reading ability in primary grade children. Child Development, 1965, 36, 609–628.
11.
Kagan, J., et al.: Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes. Psycho. Monog.1964, 78 (1, Whole No. 578).
12.
Keogh, B. K.: Pattern copying under three conditions of an expanded spatial field. Developmental Psychology, 1971, 4, 25–31.
13.
Keogh, B. K.: Hyperactivity and learning disorders: Review and speculation. Exceptional Children, 1971, 38, (2), 101–110.
14.
Keogh, B. K.: Problem Solving Strategies as Psychological Test Data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., September, 1971.
15.
Kephart, N. C.: The Slow Learner in the Classroom. Columbus, Ohio: Charles. E. Merrill, 1960.
16.
Messick, S.: The criterion problem in the evaluation of instruction: Assessing possible not just intended outcomes. Center for the Study of Evaluation, Report #22, Univ. of Calif., Los Angeles, May 1969.
17.
Roth, S.: A correlational study of three measures of field dependence-independence. Unpublished masters thesis. Univ. of Calif., Los Angeles, 1970.
18.
Stuart, I. R.: Perceptual style and reading ability: Implications for an instructional approach. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967, 24, 135–138.
19.
Watson, B. L.: Field dependence and early reading achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Univ. of Calif., Los Angeles, 1969.
20.
Wineman, J. H.Cognitive style and reading ability. Calif. J. of Educational Research, 1971, 22, (2), 74–79.
21.
Witkin, H. A.: Some implications of research and cognitive style for problems of education. Archive de Psicologia, Neurologie e Psichitria, 1965, 26, 27–55.
22.
Witkin, A.A., et al.: Psychological Differentiation. New York: Wiley, 1972.
