Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A delayed reinforcement technique was used to modify the behavior of three public school children. Academic class standing was modified in two of the children and talking out of turn and inattention were modified in the third child. A reinforcer consisting of a note signed by the teacher stating that the child had done well was dispensed after school whenever criteria levels of performance were met. The effects of this type of feedback were assessed under the following conditions: (1) the child receives a note and returns it to the teacher (child feedback) (2) the child receives a note and shows it to his parents (child-parent feedback) and (3) the child shows the note to his parents who provide reinforcers in the home (reinforcement.) The most marked improvement in behavior occurred during the reinforcement condition in all cases. The results are discussed in terms of the effectiveness of delayed reinforcement and in terms of the effects of feedback to the student, or to the student and his parents.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brackbill, Yvonne , and Kappy, M.S. : Delay of reinforcement and retention J. Comp, and Physiol. Psychology, 1962, 55, 74-8.

Graubard, P.S. : Utilizing the group in teaching disturbed delinquents to learn Exceptional Child., 1969, 36, 267-72.

Hall, R.V. , Lund, Dianne, and Jackson, Deloris: Effects of teacher attention on study behavior, J. Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968 , 7, 1-72.

Hawkins, R.P. , et al.: Results of operant conditioning techniques in modifying the behavior of emotionally disturbed children. Paper presented at Internat. Council for Exceptional Children Convention, St. Louis, March 29, 1967.

Lovitt, T.C. , and Curtiss, Karen A. : Academic response rate as a function of teacher and self-imposed contingencies J. Applied Behavior Analysis , 1969, 2, 49-53.

Madsen, C.H. , Becker, W.C. , and Thomas, D.R. : Rules, praise, and ignoring: elements of elementary classroom control. J. Applied Behavior Analysis, 7968, 7, 139-50.

Madsen, C.H. ,, et al.: An analysis of the reinforcing function of "sit down" commands In: R. K. Parker (Ed.), Readings in Educational Psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 7968.

McKenzie, H.S. , et al.: Behavior modification of children with learning disabilities using grades as tokens and allowances as back up reinforcers. Exceptional Child., 1968, 34, 745-52.

Schwartz, M.L. , and Hawkins, R.P. : Application of delayed reinforcement procedures to the behavior problems of an elementary school child. In: R. E. Ulrich et al. (Eds.), Control of Human Behavior, Vol. ll . From Cure to Prevention. Glenview, III.: Scott, Foresman, in press.

10.

Thomas, D.R. , Becker, W.C. , and Armstrong, Marianne : Production and elimination of disruptive classroom behavior by systematically varying teacher's behavior J. Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968, 1, 35-45.

11.

Wasik, Barbara H. , et al.: Behavior modification with culturally deprived school children: two case studies, J. Applied Behavior Analysis, 7969, 2, 181-94.

Delayed ReinForcement of Classroom Behavior by Parents

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References