Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-9
The Global and Local Patterns of Reading-Related Cognitive and Ecological Variables in Chinese First-Grade Children: A Cross-Sectional Network Analysis
In the current study, we tested a network model of reading difficulty by using state-of-the-art psychological network analysis. Four hundred and fifty-three Chinese first-grade children (about 38% female, mean age = 7.00, SD = 0.41) were divided into good (n = 154), competent (n = 147), and struggling (n = 152) readers based on their scores of Chinese character reading. The Extended Bayesian Information Criterion graphical lasso (EBICglasso) method was applied to estimate cross-sectional networks for the three groups. Each network included four cognitive nodes (homophone awareness, morphological structure awareness, phonological awareness, and vocabulary) and two ecological nodes (family socioeconomic status and the number of books at home). Chronological age and nonverbal intelligence were also included in the estimated networks. The global (i.e., global structure and global connectivity) and local patterns (i.e., the most important edges and nodes) in each network were reported. The network comparison results showed that global connectivity was significantly lower among struggling readers than for good readers, implying that a holistic impairment of bidirectional connections among multiple variables relates to the difficulty in learning to read. The theoretical and empirical implications and the significance of applying the network approach to reading research are discussed.
AaronP. G.JoshiM.WilliamsK. A. (1999). Not all reading disabilities are alike. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(2), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949903200203
2.
AnM. H.ParkS. S.YouS. C.ParkR. W.ParkB.WooH. K.KimH. K.SonS. J. (2019). Depressive symptom network associated with comorbid anxiety in late-life depression. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, Article 856. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00856
3.
BerningerV. W.AbbottR. D.NagyW.CarlisleJ. (2010). Growth in phonological, orthographic, and morphological awareness in grades 1 to 6. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 39(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-009-9130-6
BorsboomD.DesernoM. K.RhemtullaM.EpskampS.FriedE. I.McNallyR. J.RobinaughD. J.PeruginiM.DalegeJ.CostantiniG. (2021). Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1, Article 58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00055-w
7.
BowerC. A.MixK. S.YuanL.SmithL. B. (2022). A network analysis of children’s emerging place-value concepts. Psychological Science, 33(7), 1112–1127. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211070242
8.
BronfenbrennerU.MorrisP. A. (2007). The bioecological model of human development. In DamonW.LernerR. M.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114
9.
BurgerJ.IsvoranuA.-M.LunanskyG.HaslbeckJ. M. B.EpskampS.HoekstraR. H. A.FriedE. I.BorsboomD.BlankenT. F. (2022). Reporting standards for psychological network analyses in cross-sectional data. Psychological Methods, 28, 806–824. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000471
10.
BurgessS. R.HechtS. A.LoniganC. J. (2002). Relations of the home literacy environment (HLE)to the development of reading-related abilities: A one-year longitudinal study. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(4), 408–426. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.37.4.4
11.
BurrisP. W.PhillipsB. M.LoniganC. J. (2019). Examining the relations of the home literacy environments of families of low SES with children’s early literacy skills. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 24(2), 154–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2019.1602473
12.
CarlisleJ. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12, 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008131926604
13.
ChiuM. M.McBride-ChangC. (2006). Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_1
14.
ChiuM. M.McBride-ChangC.LinD. (2012). Ecological, psychological, and cognitive components of reading difficulties: Testing the component model of reading in fourth graders across 38 countries. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(5), 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219411431241
15.
ChoiK. W.BatchelderA. W.EhlingerP. P.SafrenS. A.O’CleirighC. (2017). Applying network analysis to psychological comorbidity and health behavior: Depression, PTSD, and sexual risk in sexual minority men with trauma histories. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(12), 1158–1170. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000241
16.
ChungK. K.HoC. S. H.ChanD. W.TsangS. M.LeeS. H. (2010). Cognitive profiles of Chinese adolescents with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 16(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.392
17.
ColéP.CavalliE.DuncanL. G.TheurelA.GentazE.Sprenger-CharollesL.El-AhmadiA. (2018). What is the influence of morphological knowledge in the early stages of reading acquisition among low SES children? A graphical modeling approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 547. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00547
18.
CollC. G.CrnicK.LambertyG.WasikB. H.JenkinsR.GarciaH. V.McAdooH. P. (1996). An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Development, 67(5), 1891–1914. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01834.x
19.
EpskampS.BorsboomD.FriedE. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1
20.
EpskampS.CramerA. O. J.WaldorpL. J.SchmittmannV. D.BorsboomD. (2012). Qqraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i04
21.
EpskampS.FriedE. I. (2018). A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychological Methods, 24(4), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000167
22.
FarrantB. M.ZubrickS. R. (2012). Early vocabulary development: The importance of joint attention and parent-child book reading. First Language, 32(3), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723711422626
23.
FengX.AltarelliI.MonzalvoK.DingG.RamusF.ShuH.DehaeneS.MengX.Dehaene-LambertzG. (2020). A universal reading network and its modulation by writing system and reading ability in French and Chinese children. Elife, 9, Article e54591. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.54591
24.
FriedE. I. (2022). Studying mental health problems as systems, not syndromes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(6), 500–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214221114089
25.
FrijtersJ. C.BarronR. W.BrunelloM. (2000). Direct and mediated influences of home literacy and literacy interest on prereaders’ oral vocabulary and early written language skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 466–477. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.466
26.
FritzJ.FriedE. I.GoodyerI. M.WilkinsonP. O.Van HarmelenA.-L. (2018). A network model of resilience factors for adolescents with and without exposure to childhood adversity. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34130-2
27.
FruchtermanT. M. J.ReingoldE. M. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software: Practice and Experience, 21, 1129–1164. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.4380211102
28.
FunkhouserC. J.CorreaK. A.GorkaS. M.NelsonB. D.PhanK. L.ShankmanS. A. (2020). The replicability and generalizability of internalizing symptom networks across five samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 129(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000496
29.
GaoY.ZhengL.LiuX.NicholsE. S.ZhangM.ShangL.DingG.MengX.LiuL. (2019). First and second language reading difficulty among Chinese–English bilingual children: The prevalence and influences from demographic characteristics. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2544. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02544
30.
GeorgiouG. K.InoueT.ParrilaR. (2021). Developmental relations between home literacy environment, reading interest, and reading skills: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 92(5), 2053–2068. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13589
31.
GoswamiU. (2002). Phonology, reading development, and dyslexia: A cross-linguistic perspective. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-002-0010-0
32.
HargraveA. C.SénéchalM. (2000). A book reading intervention with preschool children who have limited vocabularies: The benefits of regular reading and dialogic reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(99)00038-1
33.
HeerenA.McNallyR. J. (2018). Social anxiety disorder as a densely interconnected network of fear and avoidance for social situations. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 42(1), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-017-9876-3
34.
HoC. S.-H.ChanD. W.-O.LeeS.-H.TsangS.-M.LuanV. H. (2004). Cognitive profiling and preliminary subtyping in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 91(1), 43–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00163-x
35.
HoC. S.-H.LawT. P.-S.NgP. M. (2000). The phonological deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 13, 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008040922662
36.
JonesP. J.MairP.RiemannB. C.MugnoB. L.McNallyR. J. (2018). A network perspective on comorbid depression in adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 53, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.09.008
37.
JoshiR. M.AaronP. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710050084428
38.
KoH. W.ChanY. L. (2009). Family factors and primary students’ reading attainment: A Chinese community perspective. Chinese Education & Society, 42(3), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932420302
39.
KossakowskiJ. J.EpskampS.KiefferJ. M.van BorkuloC. D.RhemtullaM.BorsboomD. (2016). The application of a network approach to health-related quality of life (HRQoL): Introducing a new method for assessing HRQoL in healthy adults and cancer patients. Quality of Life Research, 25, 781–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1127-z
40.
LauJ. Y.-H.McBride-ChangC. (2005). Home literacy and Chinese reading in Hong Kong children. Early Education and Development, 16(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1601_1
41.
LiM.KohP. W.GevaE.JoshiR. M.ChenX. (2020). The componential model of reading in bilingual learners. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(8), 1532–1545. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000459
42.
LiX.HuM.LiangH. (2022). The percentages of cognitive skills deficits among Chinese children with developmental dyslexia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Sciences, 12(5), Article 548. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050548
43.
LinY.ZhangX.HuangQ.LvL.HuangA.LiA.WuK.HuangY. (2020). The prevalence of dyslexia in primary school children and their Chinese literacy assessment in Shantou, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), Article 7140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197140
44.
LiuC.GeorgiouG. K.ManolitsisG. (2018). Modeling the relationships of parents’ expectations, family’s SES, and home literacy environment with emergent literacy skills and word reading in Chinese. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 43, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.11.001
45.
LiuD.ChungK. K.McBrideC. (2016). The role of SES in Chinese (L1) and English (L2) word reading in Chinese-speaking kindergarteners. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(3), 268–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12046
46.
LiuD.WangL.XuZ.LiM.JoshiR. M.LiN.ZhangX. (2023). Understanding Chinese children’s word reading by considering the factors from cognitive, psychological and ecological factors. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 73, Article 102163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102163
47.
LiuP. D.McBride-ChangC. (2010). What is morphological awareness? Tapping lexical compounding awareness in Chinese third graders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016933
48.
LiuP. D.McBride-ChangC.WongT. T.-Y.ShuH.WongA. M.-Y. (2013). Morphological awareness in Chinese: Unique associations of homophone awareness and lexical compounding to word reading and vocabulary knowledge in Chinese children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(4), 755–775. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641200001X
MalgaroliM.CalderonA.BonannoG. A. (2021). Networks of major depressive disorder: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 85, 102000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102000
51.
MarevaS.HolmesJ., & the CALM Team. (2019). Transdiagnostic associations across communication, cognitive, and behavioural problems in a developmentally at-risk population: A network approach. BMC Pediatrics, 19, Article 452. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1818-7
52.
MarevaS.HolmesJ., & the CALM Team. (2022). Cognitive and academic skills in two developmental cohorts of different ability level: A mutualistic network perspective. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 11(2), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101870
53.
McBride-ChangC.ShuH.ZhouA.WatC. P.WagnerR. K. (2003). Morphological awareness uniquely predicts young children’s Chinese character recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 743–751. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.743
54.
McBride-ChangC.TardifT.ChoJ.-R.ShuH.FletcherP.StokesS. F.WongA.LeungK. (2008). What’s in a word? Morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge in three languages. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(3), 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640808020X
55.
McElroyE.AshtonM.BagnallA. M.ComerfordT.McKeownM.PatalayP.PenningtonA.SouthJ.WilsonT.CorcoranR. (2021). The individual, place, and wellbeing–a network analysis. BMC Public Health, 21, Article 1621. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11553-7
56.
McGrathL. M.PetersonR. L.PenningtonB. F. (2020). The multiple deficit model: Progress, problems, and prospects. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1706180
57.
MollK.GanglM.BanfiC.Schulte-KörneG.LanderlK. (2020). Stability of deficits in reading fluency and/or spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1659277
58.
NguyenM. T.NguyenT. G.TranT. T. A.NguyenT. T. N.LeD. D.NguyenT. T. B.HoangH. H.HoT. L. D.TranB. T. (2022). Network analysis of psychological factors related to academic pressure faced by medical students in the central and highland regions of Vietnam. Medical Education Online, 27(1), Article 2007577. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.2007577
59.
PanJ.KongY.SongS.McBrideC.LiuH.ShuH. (2017). Socioeconomic status, parent report of children’s early language skills, and late literacy skills: A long term follow-up study among Chinese children. Reading and Writing, 30, 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9682-4
60.
ParrilaR. K.McQuarrieL. M. (2015). Cognitive processes and academic achievement: Multiple systems model of reading. In PapadopoulosT.ParrilaR. K.KirbyJ. R. (Eds.), Cognition, intelligence, and achievement (pp. 79–100). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-410388-7.00005-1
61.
PengP.WangC.TaoS.SunC. (2017). The deficit profiles of Chinese children with reading difficulties: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 513–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9366-2
62.
PengP.WangT.WangC.LinX. (2019). A meta-analysis on the relation between fluid intelligence and reading/mathematics: Effects of tasks, age, and social economics status. Psychological Bulletin, 145(2), 189–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000182
PrevooM. J.MaldaM.MesmanJ.EmmenR. A.YeniadN.Van IjzendoornM. H.LintingM. (2014). Predicting ethnic minority children’s vocabulary from socioeconomic status, maternal language and home reading input: Different pathways for host and ethnic language. Journal of Child Language, 41(5), 963–984. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000913000299
65.
RadD.RedeșA.RomanA.EgerăuA.LileR.DemeterE.DughiT.IgnatS.BalașE.MaierR. (2022). The use of theory of planned behavior to systemically study the integrative-qualitative intentional behavior in Romanian preschool education with network analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1017011. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1017011
66.
RashidF. L.MorrisR. D.SevcikR. A. (2005). Relationship between home literacy environment and reading achievement in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194050380010101
67.
RavenJ.RavenJ. (2003). Raven progressive matrices. In McCallumR. S. (Ed.), Handbook of nonverbal assessment (pp. 223–237). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0153-4_11
68.
RhemtullaM.CramerA. O. J.van BorkR.WilliamsD. R. (2018). Cross-lagged network models. https://osf.io/9h5nj/
69.
RobinaughD. J.MillnerA. J.McNallyR. J. (2016). Identifying highly influential nodes in the complicated grief network. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(6), 747–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000181
70.
SantosH.JrFriedE. I.Asafu-AdjeiJ.RuizR. J. (2017). Network structure of perinatal depressive symptoms in Latinas: Relationship to stress and reproductive biomarkers. Research in Nursing & Health, 40(3), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21784
71.
SénéchalM.OuelletteG.RodneyD. (2006). The misunderstood giant: On the predictive role of early vocabulary to future reading. In NeumanS. B.DickinsonD. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 173–182). Guilford Press.
72.
ShuH.McBride-ChangC.WuS.LiuH. (2006). Understanding Chinese developmental dyslexia: Morphological awareness as a core cognitive construct. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.122
73.
SinghL.YeungW. J. J.ChengQ.HengE. Y. T. (2022). The home literacy environment mediates effects of socio-economic status on infant vocabulary development. Developmental Science, 26, Article e13349. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13349
74.
SuM.PeyreH.SongS.McBrideC.TardifT.LiH.ZhangY.LiangW.ZhangZ.RamusF. (2017). The influence of early linguistic skills and family factors on literacy acquisition in Chinese children: Follow-up from age 3 to age 11. Learning and Instruction, 49, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.12.003
75.
SwanD.GoswamiU. (1997). Phonological awareness deficits in developmental dyslexia and the phonological representations hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66(1), 18–41. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1997.2375
76.
SzencziB.FejesJ. B.VighT.HódiÁ.TaryB. (2023). Home reading support in Grades four, six, and eight: Does student reading motivation matter?Reading & Writing Quarterly, 40, 489–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2023.2286960
77.
TamboerP.VorstH. C.OortF. J. (2016). Five describing factors of dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(5), 466–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414558123
78.
van BorkuloC.BoschlooL.BorsboomD.PenninxB. W.WaldorpL. J.SchoeversR. A. (2015). Association of symptom network structure with the course of depression. Journal of the American Medical Association Psychiatry, 72(12), 1219–1226. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2079
79.
van BorkuloC. D.van BorkR.BoschlooL.KossakowskiJ. J.TioP.SchoeversR. A.BorsboomD.WaldorpL. J. (2022). Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test. Psychological Methods, 28, 1273–1285. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000476
80.
Van Der MaasH. L.KanK.-J.MarsmanM.StevensonC. E. (2017). Network models for cognitive development and intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 5(2), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence5020016
81.
VellutinoF. R.FletcherJ. M.SnowlingM. J.ScanlonD. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 2–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x
82.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192
83.
WangL.LiuD. (2021). Unpacking the relations between home literacy environment and word reading in Chinese children: The influence of parental responsive behaviors and parents’ difficulties with literacy activities. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 56, 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.04.002
84.
WasikB. A.HindmanA. H.SnellE. K. (2016). Book reading and vocabulary development: A systematic review. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 37, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.04.003
85.
WernerE. E.SmithR. S. (1992). Overcoming the odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501711992
YokoyamaS.OkadaG.TakagakiK.ItaiE.KambaraK.MitsuyamaY.ShinzatoH.MasudaY.JinninR.OkamotoY. (2022). Trace of depression: Network structure of depressive symptoms in different clinical conditions. European Psychiatry, 65(1), Article e20. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.12
88.
ZhangY.TardifT.ShuH.LiH.LiuH.McBride-ChangC.LiangW.ZhangZ. (2013). Phonological skills and vocabulary knowledge mediate socioeconomic status effects in predicting reading outcomes for Chinese children. Developmental Psychology, 49(4), 665–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028612
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
