The Triangle Model of Reading proposes that phonology, orthography, and semantics are crucial to understand word reading and reading disability (RD). Morphology has been added as a binding agent to this model. However, it is unclear how these variables relate to word reading in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or comorbid ADHD and RD (ADHD+RD). This study examined the performance of Chinese children with RD, ADHD, or ADHD+RD in phonology, orthography, semantics, and morphology, and investigated whether morphology made an additional contribution beyond the other skills in explaining word reading fluency. Participants were 151 Grade 1 to 3 Chinese students: RD (n = 31), ADHD (n = 43), ADHD+RD (n = 27), and typically developing controls (TD, n = 50). Results indicated that children with ADHD+RD (a) showed similar performance to RD and ADHD in tone awareness, orthographic legality, and homophone morpheme awareness; (b) had similar performance to RD but worse than ADHD in phonology, semantics, and morpheme production; and (c) had more severe deficits than RD and ADHD in orthographic reversal, morpheme identification, and homograph awareness. Morphology significantly predicted word reading fluency beyond the other skills, and its predictive effect was more salient for ADHD+RD, ADHD, and TD. The findings provide evidence of both shared and additive effects of RD and ADHD. Morphology may be an important diagnostic factor in identifying Chinese reading and behavioral deficit groups and a worthwhile target for intervention.
AaronP.G.JoshiR. M. (Eds.). (2012). Reading and writing disorders in different orthographic systems (Vol. 52). Springer Science & Business Media.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
3.
BarkleyR. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65
4.
BowersP. N.KirbyJ. R.DeaconS. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144–179. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309359353
5.
CainK.ComptonD.L.ParrilaR.K. (Eds.). (2017). Theories of reading developmentJohn Benjamins Publishing.
6.
CaoF.YanX.WangZ.LiuY.WangJ.SprayG. J.DengY. (2017). Neural signatures of phonological deficits in Chinese developmental dyslexia. NeuroImage, 146, 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.051
7.
CarlisleJ. F. (2010). Effects of instruction in morphological awareness on literacy achievement: An integrative review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 464–487. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.4.5
8.
CavalliE.DuncanL. G.ElbroC.El AhmadiA.ColéP. (2017). Phonemic—Morphemic dissociation in university students with dyslexia: An index of reading compensation?Annals of Dyslexia, 67, 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-016-0138-y
9.
ChanW. S. R.HungS. F.LiuS. N.LeeC. K. K. (2008). Cognitive profiling in Chinese developmental dyslexia with attention deficits hyperactivity disorder. Reading and Writing, 21, 661–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9084-8
10.
CuiJ.GeorgiouG. K.ZhangY.LiY.ShuH.ZhouX. (2017). Examining the relationship between rapid automatized naming and arithmetic fluency in Chinese kindergarten children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 154, 146–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.10.008
11.
DeaconS. H.KirbyJ. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological?” The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001110
12.
de JongC. G.LichtR.SergeantJ. A.OosterlaanJ. (2012). RD, ADHD, and their comorbidity from a dual route perspective. Child Neuropsychology, 18, 467–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2011.625354
13.
de JongC. G.OosterlaanJ.SergeantJ. A. (2006). The role of double dissociation studies in the search for candidate endophenotypes for the comorbidity of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and reading disability. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 53, 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349120600716158
14.
de JongC. G.Van De VoordeS.RoeyersH.RaymaekersR.OosterlaanJ.SergeantJ. A. (2009). How distinctive are ADHD and RD? Results of a double dissociation study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 1007–1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9328-y
15.
GayánJ.OlsonR. K. (2001). Genetic and environmental influences on orthographic and phonological skills in children with reading disabilities. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20, 483–507.
16.
GayánJ.WillcuttE. G.FisherS. E.FrancksC.CardonL. R.OlsonR. K.PenningtonB. F.SmithS. D.MonacoA. P.DeFriesJ. C. (2005). Bivariate linkage scan for reading disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder localizes pleiotropic loci. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 1045–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01447.x
17.
GoochD.SnowlingM.HulmeC. (2011). Time perception, phonological skills and executive function in children with dyslexia and/or ADHD symptoms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02312.x
18.
GoodwinA. P.AhnS. (2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-010-0041-x
19.
GoodwinA. P.AhnS. (2013). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions in English: Effects on literacy outcomes for school-aged children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2012.689791
20.
HaleT. S.McCrackenJ. T.McGoughJ. J.SmalleyS. L.PhillipsJ. M.ZaidelE. (2005). Impaired linguistic processing and atypical brain laterality in adults with ADHD. Clinical Neuroscience Research, 5, 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnr.2005.09.006
21.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Publications.
22.
HoC. S.-H.ChanD. W.-O.LeeS.-H.TsangS.-M.LuanV. H. (2004). Cognitive profiling and preliminary subtyping in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 91, 43–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00163-X
23.
HoC.S.-H.ChanD.W.-O.LeungP. W. L.LeeS.-H.TsangS.-M. (2005). Reading-related cognitive deficits in developmental dyslexia, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and developmental coordination disorder among Chinese children. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.40.3.2
24.
HoC. S.-H.ChanD. W.-O.TsangS.-M.LeeS.-H. (2002). The cognitive profile and multiple-deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 38, 543–553. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.4.543
25.
Horowitz-KrausT. (2015). Differential effect of cognitive training on executive functions and reading abilities in children with ADHD and in children with ADHD comorbid with reading difficulties. Journal of Attention Disorders, 19, 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054713502079
26.
KirbyJ. R.BowersP. N. (2017). Morphological instruction and literacy: Binding phonological, orthographic, and semantic features of words. In CainK.ComptonD. L.ParrilaR. K. (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 437–462). John Benjamins Publishing.
27.
KirbyJ. R.BowersP. N. (2018). The effects of morphological instruction on vocabulary learning, reading, and spelling. In BerthiaumeR.DaigleD.DesrochersA. (Eds.), Morphological processing and literacy development: Current issues and research (pp. 217–243). Routledge.
28.
KirbyJ. R.DeaconS. H.BowersP. N.IzenbergL.Wade-WoolleyL.ParrilaR. (2012). Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5
29.
KirbyJ. R.DesrochersA.RothL.LaiS. S. Y. (2008). Longitudinal predictors of word reading development. Canadian Psychology, 49, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.2.103
30.
KuoL. J.AndersonR. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41, 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4103_3
31.
LawJ. M.WoutersJ.GhesquièreP. (2015). Morphological awareness and its role in compensation in adults with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 21, 254–272.
32.
LevesqueK. C.BreadmoreH. L.DeaconS. D. (2021). How morphology impacts reading and spelling: Advancing the role of morphology in models of literacy development. Journal of Research in Reading, 44, 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12313
33.
LiH.ShuH.McBride-ChangC.LiuH.PengH. (2012). Chinese children’s character recognition: Visuo-orthographic, phonological processing, and morphological skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01460.x
34.
LiL.WuX. (2015). Effects of metalinguistic awareness on reading comprehension and the mediator role of reading fluency from grades 2 to 4. PLOS ONE, 10(3), Article e0114417. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114417
35.
LiM.ZhaoW.WangT.ZhaoY.LiL. (2018). Review of reading development in children with ADHD. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 40, 24–40. https://doi.org/10.12002/j.bisu.168
36.
LiP.McCandlissB. D.ShuH.ZevinJ. D.YangJ. (2006). A “Triangle Model” of Chinese reading. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 28. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6zv05439
LiaoC. H.GeorgiouG. K.ParrilaR. (2008). Rapid naming speed and Chinese character recognition. Reading and Writing, 21, 231–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9071-0
39.
LiuP. D.McBride-ChangC.WongT.ShuaH.WongA. (2012). Morphological awareness in Chinese: Unique associations of homophone awareness and lexical compounding to word reading and vocabulary knowledge in Chinese children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 755–775. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641200001X
40.
LiuY.LiuD. (2020). Morphological awareness and orthographic awareness link Chinese writing to reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 33, 1701–1720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-10009-0
41.
LooS. K.FisherS. E.FrancksC.OgdieM. N.MacPhieI. L.YangM.McCrackenJ. T.McGoughJ. J.NelsonS. F.MonacoA. P.SmalleyS. L. (2004). Genome-wide scan of reading ability in affected sibling pairs with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Unique and shared genetic effects. Molecular Psychiatry, 9, 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001450
42.
MacCallumR. C.ZhangS.PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.19
McBride-ChangC.LamF.LamC.ChanB.FongY.-C.WongT.-Y.WongS. W.-L. (2011). Early predictors of dyslexia in Chinese children: Familial history of dyslexia, language delay, and cognitive profiles. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 204–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02299.x
45.
McBride-ChangC.ShuH.ZhouA.WatC. P.WagnerR. K. (2003). Morphological awareness uniquely predicts young children’s Chinese character recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 743–751. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.743
46.
McBride-ChangC.TongX.ShuH.WongA. M. Y.LeungK. W.TardifT. (2008). Syllable, phoneme, and tone: Psycholinguistic units in early Chinese and English word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430801917290
47.
McBride-ChangC.WagnerR. K.MuseA.ChowW.-Y.ShuH. (2005). The role of morphological awareness in children’s vocabulary acquisition in English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 415–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640505023X
48.
McGrathL. M.PetersonR. L.PenningtonB. F. (2020). The multiple deficit model: Progress, problems, and prospects. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24, 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1706180
49.
NunesT.BryantP. (2006). Improving literacy by teaching morphemes. Routledge.
50.
PapadopoulosT. C.GeorgiouG. K.KendeouP. (2009). Investigating the double-deficit hypothesis in Greek: Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 528–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409338745
51.
ParrilaR.DudleyD.SongS.GeorgiouG. (2020). A meta-analysis of reading-level match dyslexia studies in consistent alphabetic orthographies. Annals of Dyslexia, 70, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-019-00187-5
52.
PengP.WangC.TaoS.SunC. (2017). The deficit profiles of Chinese children with reading difficulties: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 513–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9366-2
53.
PerfettiC. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383.
54.
PerfettiC. A.HartL. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. Precursors of Functional Literacy, 11, 67–86.
55.
PlautD. C.GonnermanL. M. (2000). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing?Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 445–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119661
56.
PlautD. C.McCellandJ. L.SeidenbergM. S.PattersonK. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.56
57.
RomanA. A.KirbyJ. R.ParrilaR.Wade-WoolleyL.DeaconS. H. (2009). Towards a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in Grades 4, 6, and 8. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 96–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.01.004
58.
RuanY.GeorgiouG.SongS.LiY.ShuH. (2018). Does writing system influence the associations between phonological awareness, morphological awareness and reading? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110, 180–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000216
59.
RucklidgeJ. J.TannockR. (2002). Neuropsychological profiles of adolescents with ADHD: Effects of reading difficulties and gender. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 988–1003.
60.
SeidenbergM. S. (2005). Connectionist models of word reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 238–242.
61.
SeidenbergM. S.McClellandJ. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523
62.
SextonC. C.GelhornH. L.BellJ. A.ClassiP. M. (2012). The co-occurrence of reading disorder and ADHD: Epidemiology, treatment, psychosocial impact, and economic burden. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 538–564.
63.
ShuH.McBride-ChangC.WuS.LiuH. (2006). Understanding Chinese developmental dyslexia: Morphological awareness as a core cognitive construct. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.122
64.
ShuH.MengX.ChenX.LuanH.CaoF. (2005). The subtypes of developmental dyslexia in Chinese: Evidence from three cases. Dyslexia, 11, 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.310
65.
SnowlingM. J.HulmeC. (2005). The science of reading: A Handbook. Blackwell Publishing.
66.
StafuraJ. Z.PerfettiC. A. (2017). Integrating word processing with text comprehension: Theoretical frameworks and empirical examples. In CainK.ComptonD. L.ParrilaR. K. (Eds.), Theories of reading development (pp. 9–32). John Benjamins Publishing.
67.
SwansonJ. M.KraemerH. C.HinshawS. P.ArnoldL. E.ConnersC. K.AbikoffH. B.ClevengerW.DaviesM.ElliottG. R.GreenhillL. L.HechtmanL.HozaB.JensenP. S.MarchJ. S.NewcornJ. H.OwensE. B.PelhamW. E.SchillerE.SevereJ. B.. . .WuM. (2001). Clinical relevance of the primary findings of the MTA: Success rates based on severity of ADHD and ODD symptoms at the end of treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200102000-00011
68.
TannockR.FrijtersJ. C.MartinussenR.WhiteE. J.IckowiczA.BensonN. J.LovettM. W. (2018). Combined modality intervention for ADHD with comorbid reading disorders: A proof of concept study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51, 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416678409
69.
TongX.McBride-ChangC. (2010). Developmental models of learning to read Chinese words. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1662–1676. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020611
70.
TongX.McBride-ChangC.ShuH.WongA. M. (2009). Morphological awareness, orthographic knowledge, and spelling errors: Keys to understanding early Chinese literacy acquisition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 426–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430903162910
71.
TongX.TongX.King YiuF. (2018). Beyond auditory sensory processing deficits: Lexical tone perception deficits in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51, 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417712018
72.
VellutinoF. R.FletcherJ. M.SnowlingM. J.ScanlonD. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2–40. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x
73.
VenezkyR. (1967). English orthography: Its graphical structure and its relation to sound. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/747031
74.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: Evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.30.1.73
75.
WangL. C.ChungK. K. H. (2018). Co-morbidities in Chinese children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and reading disabilities. Dyslexia, 24, 276–293.
76.
WangL. C.YangH. M. (2014). Classifying Chinese children with dyslexia by dual-route and triangle models of Chinese reading. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 2702–2713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.001
77.
WillcuttE. G.BetjemannR. S.McGrathL. M.ChhabildasN. A.OlsonR. K.DeFriesJ. C.PenningtonB. F. (2010). Etiology and neuropsychology of comorbidity between RD and ADHD: The case for multiple-deficit models. Cortex, 46, 1345–1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2010.06.009
78.
WillcuttE. G.PenningtonB. F. (2000) Comorbidity of reading disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Differences by gender and subtype. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 179–191.
79.
WillcuttE. G.PenningtonB. F.BoadaR.OglineJ. S.TunickR. A.ChhabildasN. A.OlsonR. K. (2001). A comparison of the cognitive deficits in reading disability and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.110.1.157
80.
WillcuttE. G.PenningtonB. F.OlsonR. K.ChhabildasN.HulslanderJ. (2005). Neuropsychological analyses of comorbidity between reading disability and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: In search of the common deficit. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27, 35–78. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2701_3
81.
XueJ.ShuH.LiH.LiW.TianX. (2013.). The stability of literacy-related cognitive contributions to Chinese character naming and reading fluency. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 42, 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-012-9228-0
82.
YangJ.McCandlissB. D.ShuH.ZevinJ. D. (2009). Simulating language-specific and language-general effects in a statistical learning model of Chinese reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 238–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.05.001
83.
YeungP. S.HoC. S. H.ChanD. W.ChungK. K. (2014). What are the early indicators of persistent word reading difficulties among Chinese readers in elementary grades?Dyslexia, 20, 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1471
84.
ZhangY.TardifT.ShuH.LiH.LiuH.McBride-ChangC.LiangW.ZhangZ. (2013). Phonological skills and vocabulary knowledge mediate socioeconomic status effects in predicting reading outcomes for Chinese children. Developmental Psychology, 49, 665–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028612
85.
ZhangY.ZhangL.ShuH.XiJ.WuH.ZhangY.LiP. (2012). Universality of categorical perception deficit on developmental dyslexia: An investigation of Mandarin Chinese tones. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 874–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02528.x
86.
ZhaoW.ChenB. (2015). Cognitive factors of reading in Chinese elementary school students. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 13, 367–374.
87.
ZieglerJ. C.Pech-GeorgelC.DufauS.GraingerJ. (2010). Rapid processing of letters, digits and symbols: What purely visual-attentional deficit in developmental dyslexia?Developmental Science, 13, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00983.x
