Several crucial reasons exist to determine whether an adult has had a reading disorder (RD) and to predict a child’s likelihood of developing RD. The Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ) is among the most commonly used self-reported questionnaires. High ARHQ scores indicate an increased likelihood that an adult had RD as a child and that their children may develop RD. This study focused on whether a subset of ARHQ items (ARHQ-Brief) could be equally effective in assessing adults’ reading history as the full ARHQ. We used a machine learning approach, lasso (known as L1 regularization), and identified 6 of 23 items that resulted in the ARHQ-Brief. Data from 97 adults and 47 children were included. With the ARHQ-Brief, we report a threshold of 0.323 as suitable to identify past likelihood of RD in adults with a sensitivity of 72.4% and a specificity of 81.5%. Comparison of predictive performances between ARHQ-Brief and the full ARHQ showed that ARHQ-Brief explained an additional 10%–35.2% of the variance in adult and child reading. Furthermore, we validated ARHQ-Brief’s superior ability to predict reading ability using an independent sample of 28 children. We close by discussing limitations and future directions.
AchalS.HoeftF.BrayS. (2016). Individual differences in adult reading are associated with left temporo-parietal to dorsal striatal functional connectivity. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 4069–4081. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv214
2.
Al DahhanN.GeorgiouG. K.HungR.MunozD.ParrilaR.KirbyJ. R. (2014). Eye movements of university students with and without reading difficulties during naming speed tasks. Annals of Dyslexia, 64(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-013-0090-z
3.
AlvesR. A.CastroS. L. (2005). Despistagem da dislexia em adultos através do Questionário História de Leitura [Screening of dyslexia in adults through the adult reading history questionnaire]. IberPsicologia: Anales de la Revista de Psicologia General y Aplicada, 10, 8–9.
4.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
5.
AndreolaC.MascherettiS.BelottiR.OgliariA.MarinoC.BattagliaM.ScainiS. (2021). The heritability of reading and reading-related neurocognitive components: A multi-level meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 121, 175–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.016
6.
BachS.RichardsonU.BrandeisD.MartinE.BremS. (2013). Print-specific multimodal brain activation in kindergarten improves prediction of reading skills in second grade. Neuroimage, 82, 605–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.062
7.
BerningerV. W.RichardsT. L.AbbottR. D. (2015). Differential diagnosis of dysgraphia, dyslexia, and OWL LD: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28, 1119–1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9565-0
8.
BjornsdottirG.HalldorssonJ. G.SteinbergS.HansdottirI.KristjanssonK.StefanssonH.StefanssonK. (2014). The adult reading history questionnaire (ARHQ) in Icelandic: Psychometric properties and factor structure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 532–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413478662
9.
BlachmanB. A.SchatschneiderC.FletcherJ. M.MurrayM. S.MungerK. A.VaughnM. G. (2014). Intensive reading remediation in grade 2 or 3: Are there effects a decade later?Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033663
10.
BlackJ. M.TanakaH.StanleyL.NagamineM.ZakeraniN.ThurstonA.. . . HoeftF. (2012). Maternal history of reading difficulty is associated with reduced language-related gray matter in beginning readers. Neuroimage, 59, 3021–3032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.024
11.
BonifacciP.MontuschiM.LamiL.SnowlingM. J. (2014). Parents of children with dyslexia: Cognitive, emotional and behavioral profile. Dyslexia, 20, 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1469
12.
BonifacciP.StortiM.TobiaV.SuardiA. (2016). Specific learning disorders: A look inside children’s and parents’ psychological well-being and relationships. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 532–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414566681
13.
BornsteinM. C.BradleyR. H. (Eds.). (2003). Socioeconmic status, parenting, and child development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
ConlonE. G.Zimmer-GembeckM. J.CreedP. A.TuckerM. (2006). Family history, self-perceptions, attitudes and cognitive abilities are associated with early adolescent reading skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00290.x
15.
CostelloA. B.OsborneJ. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995627.d8
16.
DeaconS. H.CookK.ParrilaR. (2012). Identifying high-functioning dyslexics: Is self-report of early reading problems enough?Annals of Dyslexia, 62, 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-012-0068-2
17.
DeaconS. H.TuckerR.BergeyB. W.LarocheA.ParrilaR. (2017). Personalized outreach to university students with a history of reading difficulties: Early screening and outreach to support academically at-risk students. Journal of College Student Development, 58, 432–450. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2017.0032
18.
de RooijM.WeedaM. (2020). Cross-validation: A method every psychologist should know. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3, 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919898466
19.
DeVellisR. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). SAGE.
20.
DonaldsonS. I.Grant-ValloneE. J. (2002). Understanding self-report bias in organizational behavior research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(2), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019637632584
21.
EsmaeeliZ.KyleF. E.LudetræK. (2019). Contribution of family risk, emergent literacy and environmental protective factors in children’s reading difficulties at the end of second-grade. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32, 2375–2399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09948-5
22.
FichtenC. S.NguyenM. N.KingL.HavelA.MimouniZ.BarileM.BuddJ.. . .GutbergJ. (2014). How well do they read? Brief English and French screening tools for college students. International Journal of Special Education, 29(1), 33–46.
23.
FinchH. (2014). A comparison of methods for group prediction with high dimensional data. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 13, 84–105. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1414814640
24.
FinucciJ. M.IsaacsS. D.WhitehouseC. C.ChildsB. (1982). Empirical validation of reading and spelling quotients. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 24, 733–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1982.tb13695.x
25.
FostickL.RevahH. (2018). Dyslexia as a multi-deficit disorder: Working memory and auditory temporal processing. Acta Psychologica, 183, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.12.010
26.
FriedmanJ.HastieT.TibshiraniR. (2010). Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software, 33, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i01
27.
GiménezA.LuqueJ. L.López-ZamoraM.Fernández-NavasM. (2015). A self-report of reading disabilities for adults: ATLAS. Anales de Pasicología, 31, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.31.1.166671
28.
GlascoeF. P. (2005). Screening for developmental and behavioral problems. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 11(3), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20068
29.
HatcherJ.SnowlingM. J.GriffithsY. M. (2002). Cognitive assessment of dyslexic students in higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902158801
30.
KirbyJ. R.SilvestriR.AllinghamB. H.ParrilaR.La FaveC. B. (2008). Learning strategies and study approaches of postsecondary students with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219407311040
31.
Krasowicz-KupisG.BogdanowiczK. M.WiejakK. (2014). Familial risk of dyslexia in Polish first grade pupils based on the ARHQ-PL Questionnaire. Health Psychology Report, 2, 237–246. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr.2014.46235
32.
LeflyD. L.PenningtonB. F. (2000). Reliability and validity of the Adult Reading History Questionnaire. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300306
33.
LeinonenS.MüllerK.LeppänenP. H.AroM.AhonenT.LyytinenH. (2001). Heterogeneity in adult dyslexic readers: Relating processing skills to the speed and accuracy of oral text reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(3–4), 265–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011117620895
34.
LoganJ. A.HartS. A.CuttingL.Deater-DeckardK.SchatschneiderC.PetrillS. (2013). Reading development in young children: Genetic and environmental influences. Child Development, 84, 2131–2144. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12104
MaughanB.MesserJ.CollishawS.SnowlingM. J.YuleW.RutterM. (2009). Persistence of literacy problems: Spelling in adolescence and at mid-life. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 50, 893–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02079.x
37.
McGonnellM.ParrilaR.DeaconH. (2007). The recruitment and description of university students who self-report difficulty acquiring early reading skills. Exceptionality Education International, 17, 155–174. https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v17i2.7602
38.
McNeishD. M. (2015). Using lasso for predictor selection and to assuage overfitting: A method long overlooked in behavioral sciences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 471–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2015.1036965
39.
MetsalaJ. L.ParrilaR.ConradN. J.DeaconS. H. (2019). Morphological awareness and reading achievement in university students. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40, 743–763. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000826
40.
MourguesC. V.PreissD. D.GrigorenkoE. L. (2014). Reading skills, creativity, and insight: Exploring the connections. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.59
41.
Nergård-NilssenT.HulmeC. (2014). Developmental dyslexia in adults: Behavioural manifestations and cognitive correlates. Dyslexia, 20(3), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/dys.1477
42.
NormanG. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
ParrilaR.CorkettJ.KirbyJ.HeinS. (2003). Adult Reading History Questionnaire-Revised [Unpublished questionnaire]. University of Alberta.
45.
ParrilaR.GeorgiouG.CorkettJ. (2007). University students with a significant history of reading difficulties: What is and is not compensated?Exceptionality Education International, 17, 195–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/t52486-000
46.
PenningtonB. F.LeflyD. L. (2001). Early reading development in children at family risk for dyslexia. Child Development, 72, 816–833. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00317
SchnepsM. H.BrockmoleJ. R.SonnertG.PomplunM. (2012). History of reading struggles linked to enhanced learning in low spatial frequency scenes. PLOS ONE, 7(4), Article e35724. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035724
SnowlingM. J.HulmeC.NationK. (2020). Defining and understanding dyslexia: Past, present and future. Oxford Review of Education, 46, 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1765756
54.
SodenB.ChristopherM. E.HulslanderJ.OlsonR. K.CuttingL.KeenanJ. M.. . . PetrillS. A. (2015). Longitudinal stability in reading comprehension is largely heritable from grades 1 to 6. PLOS ONE, 10(1), Article e0113807. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113807
55.
Stack-CutlerH. L.ParrilaR. K.TorppaM. (2016). University students with reading difficulties: Do perceived supports and comorbid difficulties predict well-being and GPA?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12092
56.
SwagermanS. C.Van BergenE.DolanC.de GeusE. J.KoenisM. M.PolH. E. H.BoomsmaD. I. (2017). Genetic transmission of reading ability. Brain and Language, 172, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.008
57.
ThompsonP. A.HulmeC.NashH. M.GoochD.Hayiou-ThomasE.SnowlingM. J. (2015). Developmental dyslexia: Predicting individual risk. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 56, 976–987. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12412
TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A.WagnerR. K. (1999). TOWRE: Test of word reading efficiency. The Psychological Corporation.
60.
van BergenE.de JongP. F.MaassenB.van der LeijA. (2014). The effect of parents’ literacy skills and children’s preliteracy skills on the risk of dyslexia. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42, 1187–1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9858-9
61.
WagnerR. K.EdwardsA. A.MalkowskiA.SchatschneiderC.JoynerR. E.WoodS.ZirpsF. A. (2019). Combining old and new for better understanding and predicting dyslexia. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(165), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20289
62.
WelcomeS. E.MezaR. A. (2019). Dimensions of the Adult Reading History Questionnaire and their relationships with reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32, 1295–1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9912-z
63.
WoodcockR. W. (1998). Woodcock-Reading Mastery Tests-Revised/Normative update. American Guidance Service.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
