Research on the question of creative benefit accompanying dyslexia has produced conflicting findings. In this meta-analysis, we determined summary effects of mean and variance differences in creativity between groups with and without dyslexia. Twenty studies were included (n = 770 individuals with dyslexia, n = 1,671 controls). A random-effects robust variance estimation (RVE) analysis indicated no mean (g = −0.02, p = .84) or variance (g = −0.0004, p = .99) differences in creativity between groups. The mean summary effect was moderated by age, gender, and creativity domain. Compared with adolescents, adults with dyslexia showed an advantage over nondyslexic adults in creativity. In addition, a higher proportion of males in the dyslexia group was associated with poorer performance compared with the controls. Finally, the dyslexia group showed a significant performance disadvantage in verbal versus figural creativity. Regarding variance differences, they varied across age and creativity domains. Compared with adults, adolescents showed smaller variability in the dyslexia group. If the creativity task measured verbal versus figural or combined creativity, the dyslexia group exhibited smaller variability. Altogether, our results suggest that individuals with dyslexia as a group are no more creative or show greater variability in creativity than peers without dyslexia.
*AlvesR. J. R.NakanoT. D. C. (2014). Creativity and intelligence in children with and without developmental dyslexia. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 24(59), 361–369.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing.
3.
*AvitiaM. (2019). Differences in creativity across domains between students with dyslexia and those without [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut].
4.
BaerJ. (2011). How divergent thinking tests mislead us: Are the Torrance Tests still relevant in the 21st century?Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 309–313.
BaerJ.KaufmanJ. C. (2017). The amusement park theoretical model of creativity: An attempt to bridge the domain specificity/generality gap. In KaufmanJ. C.GlăveanuV. P.BaerJ. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains (pp. 8–17). Cambridge University Press.
7.
*BigozziL.TarchiC.PintoG.DonfrancescoR. (2016). Divergent thinking in Italian students with and without reading impairments. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 63(4), 450–466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2015.1127335
8.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P.RothsteinH. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley.
9.
BrydenM. P.McManusI. C.Bulman-FlemingM. B. (1994). Evaluating the empirical support for the Geschwind-Behan-Galaburda model of cerebral lateralization. Brain and Cognition, 26(2), 103–167. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1994.1045
10.
CancerA.AntoniettiA. (2019). Creativity and dyslexia: Theoretical insights and empirical evidence supporting a possible link. In KreitlerS. (Ed.), New frontiers in creativity (pp. 1–31). Nova Science.
11.
*CancerA.ManzoliS.AntoniettiA. (2016). The alleged link between creativity and dyslexia: Identifying the specific process in which dyslexic students excel. Cogent Psychology, 3(1), 1190309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2016.1190309
ChamberlainR.BrunswickN.SievJ.McManusI. C. (2018). Meta-analytic findings reveal lower means but higher variances in visuospatial ability in dyslexia. British Journal of Psychology, 109(4), 897–916. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12321
14.
*CockcroftK.HartgillM. (2004). Focusing on the abilities in learning disabilities: Dyslexia and creativity. Education as Change, 8(1), 61–79.
15.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
16.
CornelissenP. L.HansenP. C.HuttonJ. L.EvangelinouV.SteinJ. F. (1998). Magnocellular visual function and children’s single word reading. Vision Research, 38(3), 471–482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00199-5
17.
CummingG. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. Routledge.
18.
DaucourtM. C.ErbeliF.LittleC. W.HaughbrookR.HartS. A. (2020). A meta-analytical review of the genetic and environmental correlations between reading and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms and reading and math. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24(1), 23–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1631827
19.
DietrichA. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1011–1026. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196731
EdwardsA. A.SchatschneiderC. (2020). Magnocellular pathway and reading rate: An equivalence test analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 24, 264–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1663856
22.
EideB. L.EideF. F. (2011). The dyslexic advantage: Unlocking the hidden potential of the dyslexic brain. Hay House.
23.
*EverattJ. (1997). The abilities and disabilities associated with adult developmental dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 20(1), 13–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00016
*EverattJ.WeeksS.BrooksP. (2008). Profiles of strengths and weaknesses in dyslexia and other learning difficulties. Dyslexia, 14(1), 16–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dys.342
26.
GeschwindN.GalaburdaA. (1987). Cerebral lateralization: Biological mechanisms, associations and pathology. MIT Press.
GuilfordJ. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
29.
GuyattG. H.OxmanA. D.VistG. E.KunzR.BrozekJ.Alonso-CoelloP.. . .SchünemannH. J. (2011). GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence-study limitations (risk of bias). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64, 407–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017
30.
GuyattG. H.OxmanA. D.VistG. E.KunzR.Falck-YtterY.Alonso-CoelloP.SchünemannH. J. (2008). GRADE: An emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. British Medical Journal, 336, 924–926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
31.
HedgesL. V.TiptonE.JohnsonM. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(1), 39–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.5
32.
KandlerC.RiemannR.AngleitnerA.SpinathF. M.BorkenauP.PenkeL. (2016). The nature of creativity: The roles of genetic factors, personality traits, cognitive abilities, and environmental sources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(2), 230–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000087
33.
*KapoulaZ.RuizS.SpectorL.MocoroviM.GaertnerC.QuiliciC.VernetM. (2016). Education influences creativity in dyslexic and non-dyslexic children and teenagers. PLOS ONE, 11(3), Article e0150421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150421
34.
*KasirerA.MashalN. (2017). Comprehension and generation of metaphoric language in children, adolescents, and adults with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 23(2), 99–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dys.1550
35.
KovasY.HaworthC. M.DaleP. S.PlominR.WeinbergR. A.ThompsonJ. M.FischerK. W. (2007). The genetic and environmental origins of learning abilities and disabilities in the early school years. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 72(3), 1–156.
36.
*KwokR. (2019, July). Character strength, creativity skills, and resilience within the dyslexic population in England [Paper presentation]. Child Language Symposium, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
37.
LaFranceE. D. B. (1997). The gifted/dyslexic child: Characterizing and addressing strengths and weaknesses. Annals of Dyslexia, 47(1), 163–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11881-997-0025-7
38.
LakensD. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
39.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE.
*ŁockiewiczM.BogdanowiczK. M.BogdanowiczM. (2014). Psychological resources of adults with developmental dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(6), 543–555. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219413478663
42.
*MartinelliV.CamilleriD. (2016). Creative giftedness and dyslexia. Malta Review of Educational Research, 10(1), 97–109.
43.
*MartinelliV.CamilleriD.FenechD. (2018). Common beliefs and research evidence about dyslexic students’ specific skills: Is it time to reassess some of the evidence. Interdisciplinary Education and Psychology, 2(2), 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.31532/InterdiscipEducPsychol.2.2.004
44.
*MartinelliV.SchembriJ. (2014). Dyslexia, spatial awareness and creativity in adolescent boys. Psychology of Education Review, 38(2), 39–47.
45.
McManusI. C.BrydenM. P. (1991). Geschwind’s theory of cerebral lateralization: Developing a formal causal model. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.237
46.
*MourgesC. V.PreissD. D.GrigorenkoE. L. (2014). Reading skills, creativity, and insight: Exploring the connections. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, E58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.59
PetersJ. L.SuttonA. J.JonesD. R.AbramsK. R.RushtonL. (2008). Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(10), 991–996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010
49.
QuinnJ. M. (2018). Differential identification of females and males with reading difficulties: A meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 31(5), 1039–1061. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9827-8
50.
RackL. (1981). Developmental dyslexia and literary creativity: Creativity in the area of deficit. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14(5), 262–263. http://doi.org/10.1177/002221948101400506
*RitchieS. J.LucianoM.HansellN. K.WrightM. J.BatesT. C. (2013). The relationship of reading ability to creativity: Positive, not negative associations. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 171–176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.02.009
53.
*SepulvedaP. (2018). Dyslexia: Hidden talents in the workplace [Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Sheffield].
54.
ShaywitzS. E. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia: A new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. Alfred A. Knopf.
55.
ShiB.XuL.ChenQ.QiuJ. (2017). Sex differences in the association between gray matter volume and verbal creativity. Neuroreport, 28(11), 666–670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000820
56.
SilbersteinR.CamfieldD. A.NieldG.StoughC. (2019). Gender differences in parieto-frontal brain functional connectivity correlates of creativity. Brain and Behavior, 9(2), e01196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1196
57.
SimontonD. K. (2008). Scientific talent, training, and performance: Intellect, personality, and genetic endowment. Review of General Psychology, 12(1), 28–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.12.1.28
58.
SkoylesJ.SkottunB. C. (2004). On the prevalence of magnocellular deficits in the visual system of non-dyslexic individuals. Brain and Language, 88(1), 79–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00162-7
59.
StanleyT. D.DoucouliagosH. (2014). Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(1), 60–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1095
SternbergR. J.LubartT. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge University Press.
63.
SterneJ. A.EggerM. (2005). Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in meta-analysis. In RothsteinH. R.SuttonA. J.BorensteinM. (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 99–110). John Wiley.
64.
*TaftiM. A.HameedyM. A.BaghalN. M. (2009). Dyslexia, a deficit or a difference: Comparing the creativity and memory skills of dyslexic and nondyslexic students in Iran. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 37(8), 1009–1016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2009.37.8.1009
65.
TakeuchiH.TakiY.NouchiR.YokoyamaR.KotozakiY.NakagawaS.. . .ArakiT. (2017). Creative females have larger white matter structures: Evidence from a large sample study. Human Brain Mapping, 38(1), 414–430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23369
TorranceE. P. (1990). Torrance test of creative thinking. Scholastic Testing Service.
68.
WestT. G. (1997). In the mind’s eye: Creative visual thinkers, gifted dyslexics, and the rise of visual technologies. Prometheus Books.
69.
WolfM. (2007). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. Icon Books.
70.
*WolffU.LundbergI. (2001, November). Dyslexia and artistic talents—Is there a connection? [Poster presentation]. International Dyslexia Association’s Conference, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
71.
WolffU.LundbergI. (2002). The prevalence of dyslexia among art students. Dyslexia, 8(1), 34–42. http://doi.org/10.1002/dys.211
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
