The study tested whether cognitive retroactive transfer (CRT) of language skills from English to Hebrew takes place; specifically, whether an improvement in linguistic and meta-linguistic skills in English as a foreign language (FL) would lead to an improvement in these skills in Hebrew as the first language (L1). The participants consisted of 124 students in Grade 6 who were randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group. Each group was further divided into readers with dyslexia, poor readers, and typical readers groups. The experimental group participated in an English intervention program designed for this study. All participants were administered a battery of pre- and post-treatment tests in linguistic and meta-linguistic skills in Hebrew and in English. The findings supported the existence of CRT from skills in English to skills in Hebrew with reference to most of the variables in the domains of reading, writing, and language skills. The improvement in most of the linguistic and meta-linguistic tasks in both English and Hebrew was significantly higher in the experimental group compared with the control group. The innovation of this study was in testing CRT of linguistic and meta-linguistic skills from English to Hebrew. Limitations and direction for future research are discussed.
Abu-RabiaS. (2001). Testing the independence hypothesis among native adult bilingual Russian-English students. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(4), 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010425825251
2.
Abu-RabiaS.Abu-RahmounN. (2012). The role of phonology and morphology in the development of basic reading skills of dyslexic and normal native Arabic readers. Creative Education, 3(7), 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.37185
3.
Abu-RabiaS.Bluestien-DanonD. (2012). A study into the results of an intervention program of linguistic skills in English (L2) and its effect on Hebrew (L1) among poor readers: An examination of the Cognitive Retroactive Transfer (CRT) hypothesis. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 2(4), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2012.2401
4.
Abu-RabiaS.SanitskyE. (2010). Advantages of bilinguals over monolinguals in learning a third language. Bilingual Research Journal, 33(2), 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2010.502797
5.
Abu-RabiaS.ShakkourW.SiegelL. (2013). Cognitive Retroactive Transfer (CRT) of language skills among bilingual Arabic-English readers. Bilingual Research Journal, 36(1), 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2013.775975
6.
Abu-RabiaS.SiegelL. S. (2002). Reading, writing, orthographic, phonological, syntactic and memory skills of bilingual Arabic-English speaking Arab children in Canada. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(6), 661–678. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021221206119
7.
Abu-RabiaS.SiegelL. S. (2003). Reading skills in three orthographies: The case of trilingual Arabic-Hebrew-English–speaking Arab children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16(7), 611–634. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025838029204
8.
Aharoni-BoussoM.SusmanN.YosefyanJ. (2006). Panorama. Eric Cohen Books.
9.
AndersonR. C.FreebodyP. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In GuthrieJ. (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117). International Reading.
10.
BialystokE.LukG.KwanE. (2005). Bilingualism, biliteracy, and learning to read. Interactions among languages and writing systems. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0901_4
11.
BirgerA. L. (2002). Entry point 1, 2, 3 (KeynanR., Ed.). University Publishing Project.
12.
CastlesA.RastleK.NationK. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
13.
ChoJ.-R.McBride-ChangC. (2005). Levels of phonological awareness in Korean and English: A 1-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 564–571. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.4.564
14.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Academic Press
15.
ComeauL.CormierP.GrandmaisonE.LacroixD. (1999). A longitudinal study of phonological processing skills in children learning to read in a second language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.29
16.
CromdalJ. (1999). Childhood bilingualism and metalinguistic skills: Analysis and control in young Swedish–English bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716499001010
17.
CumminsJ. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 221–251. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543049002222
18.
D’AngiulliA.SiegelL. S.SerraE. (2001). The development of reading in English and Italian in bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(4), 479–507. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716401004015
19.
DeaconS. H.KirbyJ. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1017.S0124716404001117
20.
DeaconS. H.Wade-WoolleyL.KirbyJ. R. (2007). Crossover: The role of morphological awareness in French immersion children’s reading. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 732–746. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.3.732
21.
DeaconS. H.Wade-WoolleyL.KirbyJ. R. (2009). Flexibility in young second-language learners: Examining the language specificity of orthographic processing. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01392.x
22.
Domínguez De RamírezR.ShapiroE. S. (2007). Cross-language relationship between Spanish and English oral reading fluency among Spanish-speaking English language learners in bilingual education classrooms. Psychology in the School, 44(8), 795–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20266
23.
DrayM.GreenbergL.YochannaM. (2000). Highlight. Eric Cohen Books.
24.
DunnL. M. (1965). Peabody picture vocabulary test. American Guidance Service. (Hebrew Edition, 1979).
25.
DurgunogluA. Y.MirM.Ariño-MartíS. (2002). The relationship between bilingual children’s reading and writing in their two languages. In RandsdellS.BarbierM. L. (Eds.), Psycholinguistic approaches to understanding second language writing (pp. 81–100). Kluwer.
26.
FarniaF.GevaE. (2013). Growth and predictors of change in English language learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(4), 389–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrir.12003
27.
FrostR.BentinS. (1992). Reading consonants and guessing vowels: Visual word recognition in Hebrew orthography. In FrostR.KatzL. (Eds.), Phonology, morphology, orthography and meaning (pp. 27–44). Elsevier.
28.
GevaE.SiegelL. (2000). Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in two languages. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(1–2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008017710115
29.
GevaE.Wade-WoolleyL.ShanyM. (1997). The development of reading efficiency in first and second language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0102_2
30.
GottardoA.ChiappeP.YanB.SiegelL.GuY. (2006). Relationships between first and second language phonological processing skills and reading in Chinese-English speakers living in English-speaking contexts. Educational Psychology, 26(3), 367–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500341098
31.
JustM. A.CarpenterP. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Allyn & Bacon.
32.
Kahn-HorwitzJ. (2006). English as a foreign language: A non formal test battery. Yozma.
33.
Kahn-HorwitzJ.SchwartzM.ShareD. L. (2011). Acquiring the complex English orthography: A tri-literacy advantage?Journal of Research in Reading, 34(1), 136–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01485.x
34.
Kahn-HorwitzJ.ShimronJ.SparksR. L. (2005). Predicting foreign language reading achievement in elementary school students. Reading and Writing, 18(6), 527–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-3179-x
35.
Kahn-HorwitzJ.SparksR. L.GoldsteinZ. (2012). English as a Foreign Language spelling development: A longitudinal study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(2), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716411000397
36.
KiefferM. J.LesauxN. K. (2008). The role of derivational morphology in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing, 21(8), 783–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9092-8
37.
KodaK. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross linguistic approach. Cambridge University Press.
38.
KodaK. (2007). Reading and language learning: Cross linguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning, 57(S1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.101997010-i1
39.
KuoL.AndersonR. C. (2006). Morphological awareness and learning to read: A cross-language perspective. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4103_3
40.
LevinI.RavidD.RapaportS. (2001). Morphology and spelling among Hebrew-speaking children: From kindergarten to first grade. Journal of Child Language, 28(3), 741–772. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000901004834
41.
MannV. A.WimmerH. (2002). Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15(7–8), 653–682. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102098470
42.
MuterV.DiethelmK. (2001). The contribution of phonological skills and letter knowledge to early reading development in a multilingual population. Language Learning, 51(2), 187–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00153
43.
NassajiH.GevaE. (1999). The contribution of phonological and orthographic processing skills to adult ESL reading: Evidence from native speakers of Farsi. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20(2), 241–267. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716499002040
44.
ProctorC. P.AugustD.CarloM. S.SnowC. E. (2006). The intriguing role of Spanish language vocabulary knowledge in predicting English reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.159
45.
QuirodaT.Lemos-BrittonZ.MostafapourE.AbbottR. D.BerningerV. W. (2002). Phonological awareness and beginning reading in Spanish-speaking ESL first graders: Research into practice. Journal of School Psychology, 40(1), 85–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4405(01)00095-4
46.
RamirezG.ChenX. I.GevaE.KieferH. (2010). Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: Within and cross-language effects on word reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23(3–4), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9203-9
47.
RamirezG.ChenX. I.GevaE.LouY. (2011). Morphological awareness and word reading in English language learners: Evidence from Spanish- and Chinese-speaking children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(3), 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716411000233
48.
RavidD. (2005). Hebrew orthography and literacy. In JoshiR. M.AaronP. G. (Eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy (pp. 339–364). Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
RichardsonJ. T. E. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001
50.
RussakS.Kahn-HorwitzJ. (2013). English as foreign language spelling: Comparisons between good and poor spellers. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrir.12009
51.
Saiegh-HaddadE.GevaE. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English-Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21(5), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x
52.
SanitskyE. (2013). Unique characteristics of dyslexia in different orthographies: A study of the profile of dyslexia in Russian, Hebrew and English orthography [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Haifa.
SchwartzM.GevaE.ShareD. L.LeikinM. (2007). Learning to read in English as third language: The cross-linguistic transfer of phonological processing skills. Written Language and Literacy, 10(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.10.1.03sch
55.
ShanyM.LachmanD.ShalemZ.BahatA.ZeigerT. (2006). “Aleph-Taph”—A test for the diagnosis of reading and writing disabilities, based on national Israeli norms. Yesod. (in Hebrew).
56.
ShanyM.ShareD. L. (2011). Subtypes of reading disability in a shallow orthography: A double dissociation between accuracy-disabled and rate disabled readers of Hebrew. Annals of Dyslexia, 61(1), 64–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-010-0047-4
57.
ShimronJ. (2006). Reading Hebrew: The language and the psychology of reading it. Lawrence Erlbaum.
58.
SiegelL. (1999). Issues in the definition and diagnosis of learning disabilities: A perspective on Guckenberger vs. Boston University. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(4), 304–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949903200405
59.
SnowC.BurnM.GriffinP. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academy Press.
60.
SolityJ.VousdenJ. (2009). Real books vs. reading schemes: A new perspective from instructional psychology. Educational Psychology, 29(4), 469–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410903103657
61.
SparksR. L.PattonJ.GanschowL.HumbachN.JavorskyJ. (2008). Early first-language reading and spelling skills predict later second-language reading and spelling skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 162–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.162
Sun-AlperinM. K.WangM. (2009). Cross-language transfer of phonological and orthographic processing skills from Spanish L1 to English L2. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9221-7
64.
TannenbaumK. R.TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_3
65.
Tov-LeeE. (2000). Reading and writing assessment grades 1 to 9. Matthew Zevulun Asher. “Ach” Publishing.
66.
Van GelderenA.SchoonenR.de GlopperK.HulstijnJ.SimisA.SnellingsP.StevensonM. (2004). Linguistic knowledge, processing speed, and metacognitive knowledge in first- and second-language reading comprehension: A componential analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.19
VermeerA. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22(2), 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716401002041
69.
VukovicR. K.SiegelL. (2006). The double-deficit hypothesis: A comprehensive analysis of the evidence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194060390010401
70.
Wade-WoolleyL.GevaE. (2000). Processing novel phonemic contrasts in the acquisition of L2 word reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4(4), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0404_3
71.
WangM.PerfettiC. A.LiuY. (2005). Chinese-English biliteracy acquisition: Cross-language and writing system transfer. Cognition, 97(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.001
72.
WoodcockR. (1973). Woodcock reading mastery test—revised. American Guidance.
73.
YangM.CoocN.ShengL. (2017). An investigation of cross-linguistic transfer between Chinese and English: A meta-analysis. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2(1), Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-017-0036-9
74.
ZaretskyE. (2017). Cross-linguistic transfer: The role of L1 grammatical morphology in L2 reading comprehension among ELLs from low SES. In LaMendolaM.ScottJ. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st annual Boston university conference on language development (pp. 794–805). Cascadilla Press.
75.
ZhangD.KodaK. (2008). Contributions of L1 reading sub-skills to L2 development in English as a foreign language among reading school-aged learners. Indonesian Journal of English Teaching, 4(1), 1–17.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
