Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-3
Magnitude Comparisons,Number Knowledge and Calculation in VeryPreterm Children and Children With Specific Learning Disability: A Cross-Population Study Using Eye-Tracking
Difficulties in mathematics have been described in very preterm children, but their origins are not well understood and may differ from other populations with specific learning disability. Very preterm children, children with learning disability, and typically developing children were compared in mathematics skills, using standardized tools, experimental tasks, and eye-tracker measures. We assessed symbolic and nonsymbolic magnitude comparisons, number knowledge, calculation, as well as cognitive skills of 103 Italian-speaking fourth and fifth graders. Compared to typically developing peers, very preterm children showed delays in number knowledge, slower reaction times in nonsymbolic magnitude comparisons, and an atypical gaze exploration characterized by more and shorter fixations that lacked a target preference. The profile of mathematics skills of very preterm children appeared different from that of children with learning disability. Although both populations showed mainly preserved cognitive skills and slower reaction times in nonsymbolic magnitude comparisons, children with specific learning disability showed more severe impairments in calculation and were slower in symbolic magnitude comparisons, compared to very preterm children. Including eye-tracking measures in preterm follow-up programs and planning tailored interventions are recommended.
Aarnoudse-MoensC. S. H.Weisglas-KuperusN.van GoudoeverJ. B.OosterlaanJ. (2009). Meta-analysis of neurobehavioral outcomes in very preterm and/or very low birth weight children. Pediatrics, 124(2), 717–728. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-2816
AnsariD.Karmiloff-SmithA. (2002). Atypical trajectories of number development: A neuroconstructivist perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 511–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)02040-5
4.
BonifacciP.NoriR. (2016). KBIT-2. Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test Second Edition. Contributo alla Taratura Italiana. Giunti-OS.
5.
BonifacciP.SnowlingM. J. (2008). Speed of processing and reading disability: A cross-linguistic investigation of dyslexia and borderline intellectual functioning. Cognition, 107(3), 999–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.006
6.
ClarkC. A.LiuY.WrightN. L. A.BedrickA.EdginJ. O. (2017). Functional neural bases of numerosity judgments in healthy adults born preterm. Brain and Cognition, 118, 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2017.07.011
7.
CornoldiC.LucangeliD.BellinaM. (2012). AC-MT 6–11. Test di valutazione delle abilità di calcolo e soluzione dei problemi. Erickson.
8.
de JongM.VerhoevenM.HoogeI. T.Maingay-VisserA. P.SpanjerbergL.van BaarA. L. (2018). Cognitive functioning in toddlerhood: The role of gestational age, attention capacities, and maternal stimulation. Developmental Psychology, 54(4), 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000446
9.
de JongM.VerhoevenM.Van BaarA. L. (2015). Attention capacities of preterm and term born toddlers: A multi-method approach. Early Human Development, 91(12), 761–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.08.015
10.
De SmedtB.GilmoreC. K. (2011). Defective number module or impaired access? Numerical magnitude processing in first graders with mathematical difficulties. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(2), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.09.003
11.
De SmedtB.NoëlM. P.GilmoreC.AnsariD. (2013). How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children’s mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2(2), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.001
12.
DownesM.KellyD.DayK.MarlowN.de HaanM. (2018). Visual attention control differences in 12-month-old preterm infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 50, 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2018.01.002
13.
D’SouzaD.BoothR.ConnollyM.HappéF.Karmiloff-SmithA. (2016). Rethinking the concepts of “local or global processors”: Evidence from Williams syndrome, Down syndrome, and Autism Spectrum Disorders. Developmental Science, 19(3), 452–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12312
14.
GearyD. C.BrownS. C.SamaranayakeV. A. (1991). Cognitive addition: A short longitudinal study of strategy choice and speed-of-processing differences in normal and mathematically disabled children. Developmental Psychology, 27(5), 787–797. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.5.787
15.
GearyD. C.HoardM. K.Byrd-CravenJ.NugentL.NumteeC. (2007). Cognitive mechanisms underlying achievement deficits in children with mathematical learning disability. Child Development, 78(4), 1343–1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01069.x
16.
GlaholtM. G.ReingoldE. M. (2009). The time course of gaze bias in visual decision tasks. Visual Cognition, 17(8), 1228–1243. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280802362962
17.
GoffinC.AnsariD. (2019). How are symbols and nonsymbolic numerical magnitudes related? Exploring bidirectional relationships in early numeracy. Mind, Brain, and Education, 13(3), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12206
18.
GuariniA.BonifacciP.TobiaV.AlessandroniR.FaldellaG.SansaviniA. (2019). The profile of very preterm children on academic achievement. A cross-population comparison with children with specific learning disorders. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 87, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2019.02.001
19.
GuariniA.SansaviniA.FabbriM.AlessandroniR.FaldellaG.Karmiloff-SmithA. (2014). Basic numerical processes in very preterm children: A critical transition from preschool to school age. Early Human Development, 90(3), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.11.003
20.
HalberdaJ.MazzoccoM. M.FeigensonL. (2008). Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with Maths achievement. Nature, 455, 665–668. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07246
21.
HartmannM. (2015). Numbers in the eye of the beholder: What do eye movements reveal about numerical cognition?Cognitive Processing, 16(1), 245–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0716-7
22.
HawesZ.MossJ.CaswellB.SeoJ.AnsariD. (2019). Kindergarten children’s symbolic number comparison skills relates to 1st grade mathematics achievement: Evidence from a two-minute paper-and-pencil test. Learning and Instruction, 59, 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.09.004
23.
HellgrenK.HalberdaJ.ForsmanL.ÅdénU.LibertusM. (2013). Compromised approximate number system acuity in extremely preterm school-aged children. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 55(12), 1109–1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12206
24.
HollowayI. D.AnsariD. (2009). Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: The numerical distance effect and individual differences in children’s mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.04.001
25.
ImafukuM.KawaiM.NiwaF.ShinyaY.InagawaM.Myowa-YamakoshiM. (2017). Preference for dynamic human images and gaze-following abilities in preterm infants at 6 and 12 months of age: An eye-tracking study. Infancy, 22(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/infa.12144
26.
LanderlK.GöbelS.MollK. (2013). Core deficit and individual manifestations of developmental dyscalculia (DD): The role of comorbidity. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2(2), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.002
27.
LanderlK.KölleC. (2009). Typical and atypical development of basic numerical skills in elementary school. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(4), 546–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2008.12.006
28.
LibertusM. E.FeigensonL.HalberdaJ. (2011). Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability. Developmental Science, 14(6), 1292–1300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01080.x
29.
LibertusM. E.ForsmanL.AdénU.HellgrenK. (2017). Deficits in approximate number system acuity and mathematical abilities in 6.5-year-old children born extremely preterm. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 1175. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01175
30.
LyonsI. M.BugdenS.ZhengS.JesusS. D.AnsariD. (2018). Symbolic number skills predict growth in nonsymbolic number skills in kindergarteners. Developmental Psychology, 54(3), 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000445
MockJ.HuberS.KleinE.MoellerK. (2016). Insights into numerical cognition: Considering eye-fixations in number processing and arithmetic. Psychological Research, 80, 334–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0739-9
33.
MoellerK.NeuburgerS.KaufmannL.LanderlK.NuerkH. C.(2009). Basic number processing deficits in developmental dyscalculia: Evidence from eye tracking. Cognitive Development, 24(4), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.09.007
34.
MollK.GöbelS. M.GoochD.LanderlK.SnowlingM. J. (2016). Cognitive risk factors for specific learning disorder: Processing speed, temporal processing, and working memory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(3), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219414547221
35.
MouraR.Lopes-SilvaJ. B.VieiraL. R.PaivaG. M.PradoA. C. D. A.WoodG.HaaseV. G. (2014). From “five” to 5 for 5 minutes: Arabic number transcoding as a short, specific, and sensitive screening tool for mathematics learning difficulties. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 30(1), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acu071
36.
MussolinC.MejiasS.NoëlM. P. (2010). Symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison in children with and without dyscalculia. Cognition, 115(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.006
PiazzaM.FacoettiA.TrussardiA. N.BertelettiI.ConteS.LucangeliD.DehaeneS.ZorziM. (2010). Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia. Cognition, 116(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.012
RaynerK.PollatsekA.AshbyJ.CliftonJrC. (2012). Psychology of reading. Psychology Press.
42.
RoidG. H.MillerL. J. (2002). Leiter International Performance Scale—Revised (Italian version). Giunti-OS.
43.
RoseS. A.FeldmanJ. F.JankowskiJ. J. (2011). Modeling a cascade of effects: The role of speed and executive functioning in preterm/full-term differences in academic achievement. Developmental Science, 14(5), 1161–1175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01068.x
44.
RousselleL.NoëlM. P. (2007). Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing. Cognition, 102(3), 361–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.005
45.
RyuH.HanG.ChoiJ.ParkH. K.KimM. J.AhnD. H.LeeH. J. (2017). Object permanence and the development of attention capacity in preterm and term infants: An eye-tracking study. Italian Journal of Pediatrics, 43(1), Article 90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-017-0408-2
SchneiderM.BeeresK.CobanL.MerzS.Susan SchmidtS.StrickerJ.De SmedtB. (2017). Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis. Developmental Science, 20(3), Article e12372. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12372
48.
SchwenkC.SasanguieD.KuhnJ. T.KempeS.DoeblerP.HollingH. (2017). (Non-) symbolic magnitude processing in children with mathematical difficulties: A meta-analysis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 64, 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.03.003
49.
SeassauM.GérardC. L.Bui-QuocE.BucciM. P. (2014). Binocular saccade coordination in reading and visual search: A developmental study in typical reader and dyslexic children. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 8, Article 85. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2014.00085
SimmsV.CraggL.GilmoreC.MarlowN.JohnsonS. (2013). Mathematics difficulties in children born very preterm: Current research and future directions. Archives of Disease in Childhood-fetal and Neonatal Edition, 98(5), 457–463. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2013-303777
52.
SimmsV.GilmoreC.CraggL.ClaytonS.MarlowN.JohnsonS. (2015). Nature and origins of mathematics difficulties in very preterm children: A different etiology than developmental dyscalculia. Pediatric Research, 77, 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2014.184
53.
SimmsV.GilmoreC.CraggL.MarlowN.WolkeD.JohnsonS. (2013). Mathematics difficulties in extremely preterm children: Evidence of a specific deficit in basic mathematics processing. Pediatric Research, 73, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2012.157
54.
SophianC.CrosbyM. E. (2008). What eye fixation patterns tell us about subitizing. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565640801982460
55.
TaylorH. G.EspyK. A.AndersonP. J. (2009). Mathematics deficiencies in children with very low birth weight or very preterm birth. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.51
56.
TinelliF.AnobileG.GoriM.Aagten-MurphyD.BartoliM.BurrD. C.CioniG.MorroneM. C. (2015). Time, number and attention in very low birth weight children. Neuropsychologia, 73, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.016
57.
Van ViersenS.SlotE. M.KroesbergenE. H.Van’t NoordendeJ. E.LesemanP. P. (2013). The added value of eye-tracking in diagnosing dyscalculia: A case study. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00679
58.
Von AsterM. G.ShalevR. S. (2007). Number development and developmental dyscalculia. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49(11), 868–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00868.x
59.
WatsonD. G.MaylorE. A.BruceL. A. (2007). The role of eye movements in subitizing and counting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(6), 1389–1399. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1389
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
