Republication of The Technology-Related Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities Act: Relevance to Individuals with Learning Disabilities and Their Advocates
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2020
Republication of The Technology-Related Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities Act: Relevance to Individuals with Learning Disabilities and Their Advocates
Assistive technology (AT) was recognized by Congress as a viable need for people with disabilities when it passed the Tech Act in 1988. The legislation, which was reauthorized in 1994, has resulted in numerous programs and services that have helped people with disabilities access and use AT devices. The Tech Act’s implications for people with learning disabilities is discussed in this article.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BryantB. R.RiveraD. (1995, March). Using assistive technology to facilitate cooperative learning. Paper presented at the Florida Educational Technology Conference, Orlando, FL.
2.
BryantB. R.RiveraD.WardeB. (1994). Technology as a means to an end: Facilitating success at the college level. In EdyburnD.MajsterekD. (Eds.), Technology applications for individuals with learning disabilities. LD Forum Monograph, 19(1), 13-8.
3.
BryantB. R.RiveraD.WoodmanE. (1994, November). Assistive technology and students with learning disabilities at the postsecondary level. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Council for Learning Disabilities, San Diego.
4.
BryantB. R.SeayP.O’ConnellM.Comstock-GalaganJ. (1996). The Texas Assistive Technology Partnership and Advocacy, Incorporated: A cooperative partnership between Texas’ Tech Act state project and its protection and advocacy system. Technology and Disability, 5, 275-282.
ElkindJ. (1993). Using computer-based readers to improve reading comprehension of students with dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 238-259.
7.
GloecklerL. C. (1993). Systems change and transition services. OSERS News in Print, 6(1), 6-12.
8.
GolinkerL. (April, 1994). Memorandum to assistive technology project directors, RE: Review of Tech Act amendments. [Professional correspondence].
9.
HigginsK.BooneR.LovittT. C. (1996). Hypertext support for remedial students and students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 402-412.
10.
HigginsE. L.RaskindM. H. (1995). An investigation of the compensatory effectiveness of speech recognition on the written composition performance of postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 159-174.
11.
House of Representatives Report 103-208. (1993). Washington, DC: Author.
12.
IBM (International Business Machines). (1991). Technology and persons with disabilities. Atlanta, GA: IBM Corporate Support Programs.
13.
JohnsonD. J.BlalockJ. W. (Eds.). (1987). Adults with learning disabilities: Clinical studies. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.
14.
MacArthurC. A. (1993). Beyond word processing: Computer support for writing processes. LD Forum, 19, 22-27.
15.
MacArthurC. A.SchwartzS. S.GrahamS. (1991). A model for writing instruction: Integrating word processing and strategy instruction into a process approach to writing. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 6(4), 230-236.
16.
McNaughtonD.HughesC.ClarkK. (1993, February). An investigation of the effect of five writing conditions on the spelling performance of college students with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Learning Disabilities Association of America, San Francisco.
17.
O’ConnellM.BryantB. R. (1995, August). Your right to assistive technology. Paper presented at the meeting of the Texas Head Injury Association, Austin, TX.
18.
PrimusC. (1990). Computer assistance model for the learning disabled (Grant No. GOO8630152-88). Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services, U.S. Department of Education.
19.
RaskindM. H.BryantB. R. (in press). Functional assessment for assistive technology: Manual. Austin, TX: Psycho-Educational Services.
20.
RaskindM. H.HermanK. L.TorgesenK. (1995). Technology for persons with learning disabilities: Report on an international symposium. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 175-184.
21.
RESNA. (1995). Compendium of Tech Act grantee programs and practices. Arlington, VA: Author.
SpekmanN. J.GoldbergR. J.HermanL. (1992). Learning disabled children grow up: A search for factors related to success in the young adult years. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 7(3), 161-170.
24.
Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act of1988. Catalogue No. 850. (Senate Rpt. 100-438). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
WetzelK. (1996). Speech-recognizing computers: A written-communication tool for students with learning disabilities?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 371-380.
27.
WhiteW. J. (1985). Perspectives on the education and training of learning disabled adults. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 231-236.
28.
WiseB. W.OlsonR. K. (1994). Computer speech and the remediation of reading and spelling problems. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12(3), 207-220.
