Longitudinal Effects of Reading and/or Mathematical Difficulties: The Role of Special Education in Graduation From Upper Secondary Education

Abstract

This study explores the long-term effects of difficulties in reading and mathematical skills on educational achievement and successful graduation from secondary education as well as the role of special education in successful graduation. Study participants were all 16-year-old ninth graders from one Finnish city (N = 595; 302 females, 293 males) who were followed for 5 years after completing compulsory education. Students’ reading and mathematical skills were measured at the end of compulsory education and their achieved grades in literacy and mathematics were received from their upper secondary schools. The overall results show that although part-time special education was available throughout both compulsory and upper secondary education, the negative longitudinal consequences of reading difficulties (RDs) and mathematical difficulties (MDs) on school achievement in literacy, mathematics, and rates of graduation can be seen. The regression path models were estimated separately for female and male students and show that among male students with RDs and MDs, the part-time special education that students received in Grades 7 to 9 was significantly related, but for Grades 10 to 11, this relationship is only significant among students with RDs. Moreover, low levels of school achievement in literacy among female students and in literacy and mathematics among male students significantly increased the likelihood of delayed graduation.

Keywords

mathematics reading longitudinal research method

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Auerbach

J. G.

Gross-Tsur

Manor

Shalev

R. S.

(2008). Emotional and behavioral characteristics over a six-year period in youths with persistent and non-persistent dyscalculia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 263–273.

Berninger

V. W.

Nielsen

Abbott

R. D.

Wijsman

Raskind

(2008). Gender differences in severity of writing and reading disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 151–172. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.02.007

Björn

P. M.

Aro

M. T.

Koponen

T. K.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

D. H.

(2016). The many faces of special education within RTI frameworks in the United States and Finland. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39, 58–66.

Butterworth

(2005). The development of arithmetical abilities. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 46, 13–18.

Carroll

J. M.

Iles

J. E.

(2006). An assessment of anxiety levels in dyslexic students in higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 651–662.

Catts

H. W.

Compton

Tomblin

J. B.

Bridges

M. S.

(2012). Prevalence and nature of late-emerging poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 166–181.

Confrey

Nguyen

K. H.

Lee

Panorkou

Corley

A. K.

Maloney

A. P.

(2012). Turn-on common core math: Learning trajectories for the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Available from. http://www.turnonccmath.net

Deshler

D. D.

Schumaker

Bulgren

Lenz

Jantzen

Adams

Marquis

(2001). Making learning easier: Connecting new knowledge to things students already know. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33(4), 82–85.

Dirks

Spyer

van Lieshou t

E. C.

de Sonneville

(2008). Prevalence of combined reading and arithmetic disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 460–473.

10.

Finnish Basic Education Act (2010). Amendment 642/2010. Retrieved from https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1998/en19980628.pdf6

11.

Finnish National Board of Education. (2015). Upper secondary education and training. Retrieved from http://www.oph.fi/english/education_system/upper_secondary_education

12.

Fletcher

J. M.

(2005). Predicting math outcomes: Reading predictors and comorbidity. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 308–312.

13.

Foegen

(2008). Algebra progress monitoring and interventions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 65–78. doi:10.2307/20528818

14.

Fogarty

Oslund

Simmons

Davis

Simmons

Anderson

. . . Roberts

(2014). Examining the effectiveness of a multicomponent reading comprehension intervention in middle schools: A focus on treatment fidelity. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 425–449.

15.

Geary

D. C.

(2010). Mathematical disabilities: Reflections on cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 130–133.

16.

Gerber

M. M.

(2012). Emerging issues in teacher education for inclusion in the U.S. In Forlin

(Ed.), Future directions for teacher education for inclusion (pp. 71–80). New York, NY: Routledge.

17.

Gilroy

D. E.

Miles

T. R.

(1996). Dyslexia at college. New York, NY: Routledge.

18.

Green

Tønnessen

F. E.

Tambs

Thoresen

Bjertness

(2009). Dyslexia: Group screening among 15–16-year-olds in Oslo, Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53, 217–227.

19.

Hadley

W. M.

(2011). College students with disabilities: A student development perspective. New Directions for Higher Education, 154, 77–81.

20.

Hakkarainen

Holopainen

Savolainen

(2015). A five-year follow-up on the role of educational support in preventing dropout from upper secondary education in Finland. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 408–422.

21.

Hawke

J. L.

Olson

R. K.

Willcut

E. G.

Wadsworth

S. J.

DeFries

J. C.

(2009). Gender ratios for reading difficulties. Dyslexia, 15, 239–242.

22.

Hellendoorn

Ruijssenaars

(2000). Personal experiences and adjustment of Dutch adults with dyslexia. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 227–239.

23.

Henderson

(2010). A challenge to do things differently. Adults Learning, 21(7), 16–18.

24.

Hintikka

Aro

Lyytinen

(2005). Computerized training of the correspondences between phonological and orthographic units. In Reitsma

Verhoeve

(Eds.), Literacy processes and literacy development (pp. 79–102). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

25.

Hitchings

W. E.

Retish

Horvath

(2005). Academic preparation of adolescents with disabilities for postsecondary education. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 28, 26–35.

26.

Holopainen

Kairaluoma

Nevala

Ahonen

Aro

(2004). Dyslexia screening test for youth and adults. Jyväskylä, Finland: Jyväskylän Yliopistopaino.

27.

Holopainen

Kiuru

Mäkihonko

Lerkkanen

M. L.

(2018). The role of part-time special education supporting students with reading and spelling difficulties from Grade 1 to Grade 2 in Finland. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 33, 316–333.

28.

Holopainen

Taipale

Savolainen

(2016). Implications of overlapping difficulties in mathematics and reading on self-concept and academic achievement. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 64, 88–103.

29.

Idol

(2006). Toward inclusion of special education students in general education: A program evaluation of eight schools. Remedial and Special Education, 27(2), 77–94.

30.

Ikäheimo

Putkonen

Voutilainen

(2002). MAKEKO: Matematiikan keskeisen oppiaineksen kokeet luokille 1–9 [Mathematical skill tests for grades 1–9]. Helsinki, Finland: Opperi.

31.

Jacobson

(1999). How Persistent is reading disability? Individual growth curves in reading. Dyslexia, 5(2), 8–93.

32.

Krawec

Huang

Montague

Kressler

Melia de Alba

(2013). The effects of cognitive strategy instruction on knowledge of math problem-solving processes of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36, 80–92.

33.

Landerl

Moll

(2010). Comorbidity of learning disorders: Prevalence and familial transmission. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51, 287–294.

34.

Landerl

Wimmer

(2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150–161.

35.

Lane

K. L.

Carter

E. W.

(2006). Supporting transition-age youth with and at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders at the secondary level: A need for further inquiry. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 66–70.

36.

Lappalainen

Hotulainen

(2012). Participation in part-time special education and its correlation with educational paths and self-concept of young adults. British Journal of Special Education, 39, 185–193.

37.

Lyon

G. R.

Shaywitz

S. E.

Shaywitz

B. A.

(2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53(1), 1–14.

38.

Madaus

J. W.

(2006). Employment outcomes of university graduates with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29(1), 19–31.

39.

Mazzocco

M. M. M.

(2005). Challenges in identifying target skills for math disability screening and intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 318–323.

40.

McCloskey

(2009). Quantitative literacy and developmental dyscalculias. In Berch

D. B.

Mazzocco

M. M.

(Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 415–429). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

41.

McKenzie

R. G.

(2009). Obscuring vital distinctions: The oversimplification of learning disabilities within RTI. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 203–215.

42.

McNulty

M. A.

(2003). Dyslexia and the life course. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 363–381.

43.

Moll

Göbell

S. M.

Snowling

M. J.

(2015). Basic number processing in children with specific learning disorders: Comorbidity of reading and mathematics disorders. Child Neuropsychology, 21, 399–417.

44.

Moll

Kunze

Neuhoff

Bruder

Schulte-Körne

(2014). Specific learning disorder: Prevalence and gender differences. PLoS ONE, 9(7), e103537. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103537

45.

Möller

Streblow

Pohlmann

(2009). Achievement and self-concept of students with learning disabilities. Social Psychology of Education, 12, 113–122.

46.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.

47.

National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2008). Adolescent literacy and older students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 211–218.

48.

Newman

L. A.

Madaus

J. W.

Javitz

H. S.

(2016). Effect of transition planning on post-secondary support receipt by students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 82, 497–514.

49.

Olson

R. K.

(2002). Dyslexia: Nature and nurture. Dyslexia, 8, 143–159.

50.

Raghubar

Barnes

M. A.

Hecht

S. A.

(2010). Working memory and mathematics: A review of developmental, individual difference, and cognitive approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 110–122.

51.

Reynolds

C. R.

Shaywitz

S. E.

(2009). Response to intervention: Ready or not? Or, from wait-to-fail to watch-them-fail. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 130–145.

52.

Royer

J. M.

Walles

(2009). Influences of gender, ethnicity, and motivation on mathematical performance. In Berch

D. B.

Mazzocco

M. M. M.

(Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 349–367). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

53.

Rumberger

R. W.

(2011). Dropping out: Why students drop out of high school and what can be done about it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

54.

Ryan

(2007). Learning disabilities in Australian universities: Hidden, ignored, and unwelcome. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 436–442.

55.

Salva-Mut

Quintana-Murci

Desmarais

(2015). Inclusion and exclusion factors in adult education of youth with a low educational level in Spain. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 6(1), 9–23.

56.

Shalev

R. S.

Manor

Gross-Tsur

(2005). Developmental dyscalculia: A prospective six-year follow-up. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 47, 121–125.

57.

Shaywitz

S. E.

Shaywitz

B. A.

(2005). Dyslexia (specific reading disability). Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1301–1309.

58.

Simmons

Singleton

(2000). The reading comprehension abilities of dyslexic students in higher education. Dyslexia, 6, 178–192.

59.

Statistics Finland. (2008). Retrieved from https://www.stat.fi/til/khak/2006/khak_2006_2008-01-17_tie_001_en.html

60.

Statistics Finland. (2015). Progress of studies. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. Retrieved from http://www.stat.fi/til/opku/2015/opku_2015_2017-03-17_tie_001_en.html

61.

Swanson

Solis

Ciullo

McKenna

J. W.

(2012). Special education teachers’ perceptions and instructional practices in response to intervention implementation. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35, 115–126.

62.

Thuneberg

Hautamäki

Ahtiainen

Lintuvuori

Vainikainen

M.-P.

Hilasvuori

(2014). Conceptual change in adopting the nationwide special education strategy in Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 15(1), 37–56.

63.

Trammell

Hathaway

(2007). Help-seeking patterns in college students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 20(1), 5–15.

64.

Vaughn

Wexler

Leroux

A. J.

Roberts

Denton

C. A.

Barth

A. E.

Fletcher

(2012). Effects of intensive reading intervention for eighth-grade students with persistently inadequate response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 515–525.

65.

Vukovic

R. K.

Siegel

L. S.

(2010). Academic and cognitive characteristics of persistent mathematics difficulty from first through fourth grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 25(1), 25–38.

66.

Weiss

M. P.

Hutchins

B. C.

Meece

J. L.

(2012). The postsecondary educational plans of rural youth with disabilities and their nondisabled peers. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 35, 180–189.

67.

Willcutt

E. G.

Petrill

S. A.

Boada

DeFries

J. C.

Olson

R. K.

Pennington

B. F.

(2013). Comorbidity between reading disability and math disability: Concurrent psychopathology, functional impairment, and neuropsychological functioning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 500–551.

68.

Willms

J. D.

(2003). Student engagement at school. A sense of belonging and participation: Results from PISA 2000. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.