This study set out to compare patterns of relationships among phonological skills, orthographic skills, semantic knowledge, listening comprehension, and reading comprehension in English as a first language (EL1) and English language learners (ELL) students and to test the applicability of the lexical quality hypothesis framework. Participants included 94 EL1 and 178 ELL Grade 5 students from diverse home-language backgrounds. Latent profile analyses conducted separately for ELLs and EL1s provided support for the lexical quality hypothesis in both groups, with the emergence of two profiles: A poor comprehenders profile was associated with poor word-reading-related skills (phonological awareness and orthographic processing) and with poor language-related skills (semantic knowledge and, to a lesser extent, listening comprehension). The good comprehenders profile was associated with average or above-average performance across the component skills, demonstrating that good reading comprehension is the result of strong phonological and orthographic processing skills as well as strong semantic and listening comprehension skills. The good and poor comprehenders profiles were highly similar for ELL and EL1 groups. Conversely, poor comprehenders struggled with these same component skills. Implications for assessment and future research are discussed.
AugustD.CarloM.DresslerC.SnowC. (2005). The critical role of vocabulary development for English language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20(1), 50–57.
2.
AugustD.ShanahanT. (Eds.). (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language—Minority children and youth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
AugustD.ShanahanT.EscamillaK. (2009). English language learners: Developing literacy in second-language learners—Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth. Journal of Literacy Research, 41(4), 432–452.
4.
BabayiğitS. (2015). The relations between word reading, oral language, and reading comprehension in children who speak English as a first (L1) and second language (L2): A multigroup structural analysis. Reading and Writing, 28(4),527–544.
5.
BarkerT. A.TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K. (1992). The role of orthographic processing skills on five different reading tasks. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(4), 335–345.
6.
BartholomewD. J. (1987). Latent variable models and factor analysis. London, UK: Charles Griffin.
7.
BeckI. L.PerfettiC. A.McKeownM. G. (1982). Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 506–521.
8.
BérubéD.Marinova-ToddS. H. (2014). The effect of sociolinguistic factors and English language proficiency on the development of French as a third language. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17(4), 465–483.
9.
BiemillerA.SlonimN. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 498–520.
10.
BlachowiczC. L.FisherP. J.OgleD. (2006). Vocabulary: Questions from the classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(4), 524–539.
11.
BradleyL.BryantP. (1991). Phonological skills before and after learning to read. In BradyS. A.ShankweilerD. P. (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 37–45). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Branum-MartinL.FletcherJ. M.StuebingK. K. (2013). Classification and identification of reading and math disabilities: The special case of comorbidity. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(6), 490–499.
13.
CarlisleJ. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12(3), 169–190.
14.
CarlisleJ. F. (2007). Fostering morphological processing, vocabulary development, and reading comprehension. In WagnerR. K.MuseA.TannenbaumK. (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition and its implications for reading comprehension (pp. 78–103). New York, NY: Guilford.
15.
CarlisleJ. F.BeemanM. M.ShahP. P. (1996). The metalinguistic capabilities and English literacy of Hispanic high school students: An exploratory study. In Yearbook—National Reading Conference (Vol. 45, pp. 306–316). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
16.
CarloM. S.AugustD.McLaughlinB.SnowC. E.DresslerC.LippmanD. N.WhiteC. E. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 188–215.
17.
CattsH. W. (1991). Early identification of dyslexia: Evidence from a follow-up study of speech-language impaired children. Annals of Dyslexia, 41(1), 163–177.
18.
CattsH. W.AdlofS. M.WeismerS. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49(2), 278–293.
19.
ChiappeP.SiegelL. S. (1999). Phonological awareness and reading acquisition in English- and Punjabi-speaking Canadian children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 20–28.
20.
ChungC. S.KohP. W.DeaconH.ChenX. (2017). Learning to read in English and French: Emergent readers in French immersion. Topics in Language Disorders, 37(2), 136–153.
21.
CohanS. L.ChaviraD. A.Shipon-BlumE.HitchcockC.RoeschS. C.SteinM. B. (2008). Refining the classification of children with selective mutism: A latent profile analysis. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37(4), 770–784.
22.
DeaconS. H.KirbyJ. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(2), 223–238.
23.
DroopM.VerhoevenL. (2003). Language proficiency and reading ability in first and second-language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 78–103.
24.
DurgunoğluA. Y.NagyW. E.Hancin-BhattB. J. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 453–465.
25.
FarniaF.GevaE. (2011). Cognitive correlates of vocabulary growth in English language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32(4), 711–738.
26.
FarniaF.GevaE. (2013). Growth and predictors of change in English language learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(4), 389–421.
27.
GevaE. (2006). Second-language oral proficiency and second-language literacy. In AugustD.ShanahanT.(Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth (pp. 123–140). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
GevaE.FarniaF. (2012). Developmental changes in the nature of language proficiency and reading fluency paint a more complex view of reading comprehension in ELL and EL1. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1819–1845.
29.
GevaE.LafranceL. (2011). Linguistic and cognitive processes in the development of spelling in ELLs: L1 transfer, language proficiency, or cognitive processes. In DurgunogluA.GoldenbergC. (Eds.), Language and literacy development in bilingual settings (pp. 245–279). New York, NY: Guilford.
30.
GevaE.Massey-GarrisonA. (2013). A comparison of the language skills of ELLs and monolinguals who are poor decoders, poor comprehenders, or normal readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46(5), 387–401.
31.
GevaE.Yaghoub-ZadehZ.SchusterB. (2000). Understanding individual differences in word recognition skills of ESL children. Annals of Dyslexia, 50(1), 121–154.
32.
GibsonW. A. (1959). Three multivariate models: Factor analysis, latent structure analysis, and latent profile analysis. Psychometrika, 24(3), 229–252.
33.
GottardoA.MirzaA.KohP. W.FerreiraA.JavierC. (2017). Unpacking listening comprehension: The role of vocabulary, morphological awareness, and syntactic knowledge in reading comprehension. Reading and Writing. Advance online publication.
34.
GottardoA.YanB.SiegelL. S.Wade-WoolleyL. (2001). Factors related to English reading performance in children with Chinese as a first language: More evidence of cross-language transfer of phonological processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 530–542.
35.
HooverW. A.GoughP. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160.
36.
IsbellR.SobolJ.LindauerL.LowranceA. (2004). The effects of storytelling and story reading on the oral language complexity and story comprehension of young children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(3), 157–163.
37.
JeonE. H.YamashitaJ. (2014). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 64(1), 160–212.
38.
Kahn-HorwitzJ.SparksR. L.GoldsteinZ. (2012). English as a foreign language spelling development: A longitudinal study. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(2), 343–363.
39.
KarlsenJ.GevaE.LysterS. A. (2016). Cognitive, linguistic, and contextual factors in Norwegian second language learner’s narrative production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(5), 1117–1145.
40.
KarlsenJ.LysterS. A. H.LervågA. (2016). Vocabulary development in Norwegian L1 and L2 learners in the kindergarten-school transition. Journal of Child Language, 44(2), 1–25.
41.
KiefferM. J. (2012). Early oral language and later reading development in Spanish-speaking English language learners: Evidence from a nine-year longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33(3), 146–157.
42.
KodaK. (2008). Impacts of prior literacy experience on learning to read in a second language. In KodaK.ZehlerA. M. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages: Cross-linguistic relationships in first- and second-language literacy development (pp. 68–96). London, UK: Routledge.
LervågA.AukrustV. G. (2010). Vocabulary knowledge is a critical determinant of the difference in reading comprehension growth between first and second language learners. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(5), 612–620.
45.
LesauxN. K.KiefferM. J.FallerS. E.KelleyJ. G. (2010). The effectiveness and ease of implementation of an academic vocabulary intervention for linguistically diverse students in urban middle schools. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 196–228.
46.
LesauxN. K.RuppA.SiegelL. (2007). Growth in reading skills of children from diverse linguistic backgrounds: Findings from a 5-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 821–834.
47.
LesauxN. K.SiegelL. S. (2003). The development of reading in children who speak English as a second language. Developmental Psychology, 39(6), 1005–1019.
48.
LiM.KirbyJ. R. (2014). Unexpected poor comprehenders among adolescent ESL students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(2), 75–93.
49.
MacGinitieW. H.MacGinitieR. K. (1992). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (2nd Canadian ed.). Toronto, ON, Canada: Nelson.
50.
Mancilla-MartinezJ.LesauxN. K. (2017). Early indicators of later English reading comprehension outcomes among children from Spanish-speaking homes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 1–21.
51.
ManisF. R.LindseyK. A.BaileyC. E. (2004). Development of reading in Grades K-2 in Spanish-speaking English-language learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19(4), 214–224.
52.
MasynK. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. In LittleT. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 375–393). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
53.
Melby-LervågM.LervågA. (2014). Reading comprehension and its underlying components in second-language learners: A meta-analysis of studies comparing first-and second-language learners. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 409–433.
54.
MokhtariK.ThompsonH. B. (2006). How problems of reading fluency and comprehension are related to difficulties in syntactic awareness skills among fifth graders. Literacy Research and Instruction, 46(1), 73–94.
55.
MorrowA.GoldsteinB. A.GilhoolA.ParadisJ. (2014). Phonological skills in English language learners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 45(1), 26–39.
56.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables: User’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
57.
NagyW. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary-comprehension connection. In WagnerR. K.MuseA.TannenbaumK. (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition and its implications for reading comprehension (pp. 52–77). New York, NY: Guilford.
58.
NakamotoJ.LindseyK. A.ManisF. R. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of English language learners’ word decoding and reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 20(7), 691–719.
59.
NationK.SnowlingM. J. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27(4), 342–356.
60.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
61.
OuelletteG. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 554–566.
62.
PasquarellaA.GottardoA.GrantA. (2012). Comparing factors related to reading comprehension in adolescents who speak English as a first (L1) or second (L2) language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(6), 475–503.
63.
PerfettiC. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 357–383.
64.
PerfettiC. A.HartL. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. Precursors of Functional Literacy, 11, 67–86.
65.
PriorA.GoldinaA.ShanyM.GevaE.KatzirT. (2014). Lexical inference in L2: Predictive roles of vocabulary knowledge and reading skill beyond reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 27(8), 1467–1484.
66.
ProctorC. P.AugustD.CarloM. S.SnowC. (2006). The intriguing role of Spanish language vocabulary knowledge in predicting English reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 159–169.
67.
ProctorC. P.CarloM.AugustD.SnowC. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 246–256.
68.
RavenJ.RavenJ. C.CourtJ. H. (1998). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales, Section 1: General overview. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
69.
RichterT.IsbernerM. B.NaumannJ.NeebY. (2013). Lexical quality and reading comprehension in primary school children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(6), 415–434.
70.
RosnerJ.SimonD. P. (1971). The auditory analysis test: An initial report. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 383–392.
71.
RussakS.Kahn-HorwitzJ. (2015). English as a foreign language spelling: Comparisons between good and poor spellers. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(3), 307–330.
72.
Saiegh-HaddadE.JayusyA. (2016). Metalinguistic awareness in reading Hebrew L2. Acquisition and Development of Hebrew: From Infancy to Adolescence, 19, 353–386.
73.
SchiffR.Schwartz-NahshonS.NagarR. (2011). Effect of phonological and morphological awareness on reading comprehension in Hebrew-speaking adolescents with reading disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 61(1), 44–63.
74.
SchwarzG. (1978). Estimating the dimensions of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
75.
ScloveL. S. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333–343.
76.
SemelE.WiggE. H.SecordW. A. (1995). The clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
77.
StanovichK. E. (1992). Speculations on the causes and consequences of individual differences in early acquisition. In GoughP. B.EhriL. E.TreimanR. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 307–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
78.
StanovichK. E.WestR. F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433.
79.
Statistics Canada. (2001). Census of Canada topic based tabulations, immigration and citizenship tables: Immigrant status and place of birth of respondent, sex, and age groups, for population, for census metropolitan areas, tracted census agglomerations and census tracts, 2001 census (Catalogue #95F0357XCB2001002). Ottawa, ON, Canada: Author.
80.
SwansonL. (2017). A latent transition analysis of English language learners with reading disabilities: Do measures of cognition add to predictions of late emerging risk status?Topics in Language Disorders, 37(2), 114–135.
81.
TilstraJ.McMasterK.Van den BroekP.KendeouP.RappD. (2009). Simple but complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(4), 383–401.
82.
TunmerW. E.NesdaleA. R.WrightA. D. (1987). Syntactic awareness and reading acquisition. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 5(1), 25–34.
Van ZeelandH. (2014). Lexical inferencing in first and second language listening. Modern Language Journal, 98(4), 1006–1021.
85.
VerhoevenL.SteengeJ.van LeeuweJ.van BalkomH. (2017). Componential skills in second language development of bilingual children with Specific Language Impairment. Topics in Language Disorders, 37(2), 154–169.
86.
VerhoevenL.van LeeuweJ. (2008). Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(3), 407–423.
87.
VermuntJ. K.MagidsonJ. (2002). Latent class cluster analysis. In HagenaarsJ. A.McCutcheonA. L. (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 89–106). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
88.
Wade-WoolleyL.SiegelL. S. (1997). The spelling performance of ESL and native speakers of English as a function of reading skill. In TreimanR. (Ed.) Spelling (pp. 73–92). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
89.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A. (1999). CTOPP: Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
90.
WilkinsonG. S. (1993). Wide Range Achievement Test–Revised (WRAT 3-R, 3rd ed.). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.
