Following a review of contemporary models of word-level processing for reading and their limitations, we propose a new hypothetical model of Chinese character reading, namely, the graded lexical space mapping model that characterizes how sublexical radicals and lexical information are involved in Chinese character reading development. The underlying assumption of this model is that Chinese character recognition is a process of competitive mappings of phonology, semantics, and orthography in both lexical and sublexical systems, operating as functions of statistical properties of print input based on the individual’s specific level of reading. This model leads to several testable predictions concerning how the quasiregularity and continuity of Chinese-specific radicals are organized in memory for both child and adult readers at different developmental stages of reading.
AndersonR. C.LiW.KuY. M.ShuH.WuN. (2003). Use of partial information in learning to read Chinese characters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 52–57.
2.
ChanD. W.HoC. S. H.TsangS. M.LeeS. H.ChungK. K. (2003). Reading-related behavioral characteristics of Chinese children with dyslexia: The use of the teachers’ behavior checklist in Hong Kong. Annals of Dyslexia, 53(1), 300–323.
3.
ChanL.NunesT. (1998). Children’s understanding of the formal and functional characteristics of written Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(1), 115–131.
4.
ChanY.-I. (2012). From radical to the character: The role of semantic, phonetic, and positional cues in children’s novel character learning (Unpublished undergraduate dissertation). University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
5.
ChenM. J.WeekesB. S. (2004). Hanzi yipang dui handingguilei yu jueding de xiaoguo [Effects of semantic radicals on Chinese character categorization and character decision]. 中華心理學刊, 46(2/3), 181–196.
6.
CheungH.ChanM.ChongK. (2007). Use of orthographic knowledge in reading by Chinese-English bi-scriptal children. Language Learning, 57(3), 469–505.
7.
ColtheartM.RastleK.PerryC.LangdonR.ZieglerJ. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256.
8.
DingG.PengD.TaftM. (2004). The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese: A priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 530–539.
9.
FanK.GaoJ.AoX. (1984). On the pronunciation of characters and pinyin alphabet. Language Construction, 3, 19–22.
10.
FangY.ZhangJ. (2009). Hanzici he tupian mingming yu fenlei de bijiao [Asymmetry in naming and categorizing of Chinese words and pictures: Role of semantic]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41(2), 114–126.
11.
FeldmanL. B.SiokW. W. (1999). Semantic radicals contribute to the visual identification of Chinese characters. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(4), 559–576.
12.
HeX. J. (2015). Statistical learning: A new perspective on Chinese orthographic learning in normal and dyslexic readers (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
13.
HeX.TongX. (2015). Statistical learning as a key to understanding orthographic learning in Chinese. Manuscript submitted for publication.
14.
HoC. S.-H.BryantP. (1997). Learning to read Chinese beyond the logographic phase. Reading Research Quarterly, 32(3), 276–289.
15.
HoC. S. H.ChanD. W. O.TsangS. M.LeeS. H. (2002). The cognitive profile and multiple-deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 38(4), 543–553.
16.
HoC. S.-H.NgT.-T.NgW.-K. (2003). A “radical” approach to reading development in Chinese: The role of semantic radicals and phonetic radicals. Journal of Literacy Research, 35, 849–878.
17.
HoC. S. H.WongW. L.ChanW. S. (1999). The use of orthographic analogies in learning to read Chinese. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 393–403.
18.
HoosainR. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.1017/s0047404500015177
19.
McBrideC.WangY. (2015). Learning to read Chinese: Universal and unique cognitive cores. Child Development Perspectives, 9(3), 196–200.
20.
PerfettiC. A.LiuY.TanL. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112(1), 43–59.
21.
PlautD. C.McClellandJ. L.SeidenbergM. S.PattersonK. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56–115.
22.
SeidenbergM. S. (2005). Connectionist models of word reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 238–242. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00372.x
23.
SeidenbergM. S.McClellandJ. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568.
24.
ShareD. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615.
25.
ShuH.ChenX.AndersonR. C.WuN.XuanY. (2003). Properties of school Chinese: Implications for learning to read. Child Development, 74(1), 27–47.
26.
ShuH.ZhengH. (1996). Children awareness of phonological cues in Chinese characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 3, 227–233.
27.
TaftM.ZhuX. (1997). Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(3), 761–775.
28.
TaftM.ZhuX.DingG. (2000). The relationship between character and radical representation in Chinese. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 32(Suppl.), 3–12.
29.
TaftM.ZhuX.PengD. (1999). Positional specificity of radicals in Chinese character recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(4), 498–519.
30.
TongX.McBrideC. (2014). Chinese children’s statistical learning of orthographic regularities: Positional constraints and character structure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 25, 1–18. doi:10.1080/10888438.2014.884098
31.
TongX.McBride-ChangC. (2010). Developmental models of learning to read Chinese words. Developmental Psychology, 46(6), 1662–1676.
32.
TongX.TongX.McBrideC. (2017). Radical sensitivity is the key to understanding Chinese character acquisition in children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. doi:10.1007/s11145-017-9722-8
33.
WuN.ZhouX.ShuH. (1999). Sublexical processing in reading Chinese: A development study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(5/6), 503–524.
34.
WilliamsC.BeverT. (2010). Chinese character decoding: A semantic bias?Reading and Writing, 23(5), 589–605.
35.
YangJ.McCandlissB. D.ShuH.ZevinJ. D. (2009). Simulating language-specific and language-general effects in a statistical learning model of Chinese reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(2), 238–257.
36.
YinB.RohsenowJ. (1994). Modern Chinese characters. Beijing, China: Sinolingua.
37.
ZhouX.Marslen-WilsonW. (1999). Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 579–606.
38.
ZhuX. (1988). Analysis of cueing function of phonetic components in modern Chinese [in Chinese]. In YuanX. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Symposium on the Chinese Language and Characters (pp. 85–99). Beijing, China: Guang Ming Daily Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
