Visual processes in Grade 1 were examined for their predictive influences in nonalphanumeric and alphanumeric rapid naming (RAN) in 51 poor early and 69 typical readers. In a lagged design, children were followed longitudinally from Grade 1 to Grade 3 over 5 testing occasions. RAN outcomes in early Grade 2 were predicted by speeded and nonspeeded visual processing measures, after controlling for initial (Grade 1) RAN, matrix reasoning, phonological awareness, and word decoding abilities. A predictive influence of backward visual masking—a speeded visual discrimination task—was found for nonalphanumeric RAN in early Grade 2 but not for alphanumeric RAN or subsequent RAN ability in Grades 2 and 3. A nonspeeded predictor involving controlled visual attention accounted for significant variance in early Grade 2 RAN in the poor early reader group. Results are discussed in relation to Wolf, Bowers, and Biddle’s conceptualization of rapid naming—in particular, on the roles of visual processes in speeded low and nonspeeded high spatial frequency visual information in predicting RAN.
AraújoS.InácioF.FranciscoA.FaíscaL.PeterssonK. M.ReisA. (2011). Component processes subserving rapid automatized naming in dyslexic and non-dyslexic readers. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 17(3), 242–255. doi:10.1002/dys.433
2.
BodenC.GiaschiD. (2007). M-stream deficits and reading-related visual processes in developmental dyslexia. Psychological Bulletin, 133(2) 346–366. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.346
3.
BoetsB.VandermostenM.CornelissenP.WoutersJ.GhesquiereP. (2011). Coherent motion sensitivity and reading development in the transition from prereading to reading stage. Child Development, 82(3), 854–869. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01527.x
BruckM. (1982). Language disabled children: Performance in an additive bilingual education program. Applied Psycholinguistics, 3, 45–60.
6.
ConlonE. G.LilleskaretG.WrightC. M.StuksrudA. (2013). Why do adults with dyslexia have poor global motion sensitivity?Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 859. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00859
7.
ConradN. J.LevyB. A. (2007). Letter processing and the formation of memory representations in children with naming speed deficits. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20(3), 201–223. doi:10.1007/slll45-006-9028-8
8.
EnnsJ. T. (2004). Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking. Vision Research, 44, 1321–1331. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2003.10.024
9.
EnnsJ. T.Di LolloV. (2000). What’s new in visual masking?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(9), 345–352.
10.
FacoettiA.LorussaM. L.PaganonicP.CattaneoaC.GalliaR.UmiltabC.MascettibG. G. (2003). Auditory and visual automatic attention deficits in developmental dyslexia. Cognitive Brain Research, 16(2), 185–191. doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00270-7
11.
FeagansL. V.MerriweatherA. (1990). Visual discrimination of letter-like forms and its relationship to achievement over time in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(7), 417–425.
12.
FlanaganD. P.KaufmanA. S. (2009). Essentials of WISC-IV assessment (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
13.
FrijtersJ. C.LovettM. W.SteinbachK. A.WolfM.SevcikR. A.MorrisR. D. (2011). Neurocognitive predictors of reading outcomes for children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(2), 150–166. doi:10.1177/0022219410391185
14.
GeorgiouG. K.PapadopoulosT. C.ZarounaE.ParrilaR. (2012). Are auditory and visual processing deficits related to developmental dyslexia?Dyslexia, 18(2), 110–129. doi:10.1002/dys.1439
15.
GeorgiouG. K.ParrilaR.KirbyJ. (2006). Rapid naming speed components and early reading acquisition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(2), 199–220. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1002_4
16.
GeorgiouG. K.ParrilaR.KirbyJ. R. (2009). RAN components and reading development from Grade 3 to Grade 5: What underlies their relationship?Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 508–534. doi:10.1080/10888430903034796
17.
GeorgiouG. K.ParrilaR.KirbyJ. R.StephensonK. (2008). Rapid naming components and their relationship with phonological awareness, orthographic knowledge, speed of processing, and different reading outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(4), 325–350. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10888430802378518
18.
HariR.RenvallH.TanskanenT. (2001). Left minineglect in dyslexic adults. Neuroscience Letters, 271, 202–204.
19.
JonesM. W.ObregónM.KellyL.BraniganH. P. (2008). Elucidating the component processes involved in dyslexic and non-dyslexic reading fluency: An eye-tracking study. Cognition, 109, 389–407. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.005
20.
KailR.HallL. K.CaskeyB. J. (1999). Processing speed, exposure to print, and naming speed. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20(2), 303–314.
21.
KevanA.PammerK. (2008). Visual deficits in pre-readers at familial risk for dyslexia. Vision Research, 48, 2835–2839. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.022
KrukR. S.WillowsD. M. (2001). Backward pattern masking of familiar and unfamiliar materials in disabled and normal readers. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18(1), 19–37.
24.
KupermanV.Van DykeJ. A.HenryR. (2016). Eye-movement control in RAN and reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(2), 173–188. doi:10.1080/10888438.2015.1128435
25.
LepolaJ.PoskipartaE.LaakkonenE.NiemiP. (2005). Development of and relationship between phonological and motivational processes and naming speed in predicting word recognition in Grade 1. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(4), 367–399. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0904_3
26.
MainK. L.PestilliF.MezerA.YeatmanJ.MartinR.PhippsS.WandellB. (2014). Speed discrimination predicts word but not pseudo-word reading rate in adults and children. Brain and Language, 138, 27–37. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.09.00
27.
MeyerM. S.WoodF. B.HartL. A.FeltonR. A. (1998). Selective predictive value of rapid automized naming in poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(2), 106–117.
28.
MollK.JonesM. (2013). Naming fluency in dyslexic and nondyslexic readers: Differential effects of visual crowding in foveal, parafoveal, and peripheral vision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Hove), 66(11), 2085–2091. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.840852
29.
NaplesA. J.ChangJ. T.KatzL.GrigorenkoE. L. (2009). Same or different? Insights into the etiology of phonological awareness and rapid naming. Biological Psychology, 80, 226–239. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.10.002
30.
NortonE. S.WolfM. (2012). Rapid automatized naming (RAN)and reading fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 427–452. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100431
31.
PammerK.LavisR.HansenP.CornelissenP. L. (2004). Symbol-string sensitivity and children’s reading. Brain and Language, 89, 601–610. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.01.009
32.
PeughJ. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48(1), 85–112. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002
33.
PlazaM.CohenH. (2007). The contribution of phonological awareness and visual attention in early reading and spelling. Dyslexia, 13, 67–76. doi:10.1002/dys.330
34.
RaymondJ. E.SorensenR. E. (1998). Visual motion perception in children with dyslexia: Normal detection but abnormal integration. Visual Cognition, 5, 389–404.
35.
SavageR.PillayV.MelidonaS. (2007). Deconstructing rapid automatized naming: Component processes and the prediction of reading difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(2), 129–146. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.04.001
36.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195152968.001.0001
37.
SolanH. A.LarsonS.Shelley-TremblayJ.FicarraA.SilvermanM. (2001). Role of visual attention in cognitive control of oculomotor readiness in students with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 107.
38.
SolanH. A.Shelley-TremblayJ. F.HansenP. C.LarsonS. (2007). Is there a common linkage among reading comprehension, visual attention, and magnocellular processing?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 270–279. doi:10.1177/00222194070400030701
39.
SolmanR. T.ChoH. S. (1991). Colour-mediated grouping effects in good and disabled readers. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 11(4), 320–327.
40.
StainthorpR. L.StuartM.PowellD.QuinlanP.GarwoodH. (2010). Visual processing deficits in children with slow RAN performance. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14(3), 266–292. doi:10.1080/10888431003724070
41.
ValdoisS.BosseM. L.TainturierM. J. (2004). The cognitive deficits responsible for developmental dyslexia: Review of evidence for a selective visual attentional disorder. Dyslexia, 10, 339–363. doi:10.1002/dys.284
42.
VellutinoF. R.FletcherJ. M.SnowlingM. J.ScanlonD. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 2–40.
43.
VidyasagarT. R.PammerK. (2010) Dyslexia: A deficit in visuo-spatial attention, not in phonological processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(2), 57–63. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.003
44.
VPixx Technologies Inc. (2009). VPixx program. Saint-Bruno, Canada: Author.
45.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192–212.
46.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing: Examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed, Inc.
47.
WechslerD. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scales of Intelligence. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
48.
WilkinsonG. (1993). Wide Range Achievement Test: Manual (3rd ed.). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.
49.
WolfM.BowersP. G.BiddleK. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(4), 387–407. doi:10.1177/002221940003300409
50.
WoodcockR. W. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-R/NU. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
