Clinicians uniformly recommend accommodations for college students with learning disabilities; however, we know very little about which accommodations they select and the validity of their recommendations. We examined the assessment documentation of a large sample of community college students receiving academic accommodations for learning disabilities to determine (a) which accommodations their clinicians recommended and (b) whether clinicians’ recommendations were supported by objective data gathered during the assessment process. In addition to test and instructional accommodations, many clinicians recommended that students with learning disabilities should have different educational expectations, standards, and methods of evaluation (i.e., grading) than their nondisabled classmates. Many of their recommendations for accommodations were not supported by objective evidence from students’ history, diagnosis, test data, and current functioning. Furthermore, clinicians often recommended accommodations that were not specific to the student’s diagnosis or area of disability. Our findings highlight the need for individually selected accommodations matched to students’ needs and academic contexts.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
4.
Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act, Pub. L. No. 110–325 § 3406 (2008).
5.
Association on Higher Education and Disability. (2012). Supporting accommodation requests: Guidance on documentation practices. Huntersville, NC: Author.
6.
BanerjeeM.MadausJ. W.GelbarN. (2014). Applying LD documentation guidelines at the postsecondary level. Learning Disability Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0731948713518335
7.
BrueggemannA. E.KamphausR. W.DombrowskiS. C. (2008). An impairment model of learning disability diagnosis. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39, 424–430.
8.
BurgstahlerS.CoryR. (2008). Universal design in higher education: From principles to practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
9.
Cahalan-LaitusisC.KingT.ClineF.BridgemanB. (2006). Observational timing study on the SAT Reasoning Test for test-takers with learning disabilities and/or ADHD. New York, NY: Educational Testing Service.
10.
CortiellaC. (2013). Diplomas at risk: A critical look at the graduation rates of students with learning disabilities. New York, NY: National Center for Learning Disabilities.
11.
Disability Rights California. (2012). Rights of students with disabilities in higher education. Sacramento, CA: Author.
12.
Equal Opportunity Employment Commission. (2011). Regulations to implement the equal employment provisions of the Americans With Disabilities Act as amended. Federal Register, 76, 16977.
13.
FlanaganD. P.OrtizS. O.AlfonsoV. C.MascoloJ. T. (2006). The achievement test desk reference: A guide to learning disability identification. New York, NY: John Wiley.
14.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.WilliamsJ. P.BakerS. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279–320.
15.
GordonM.LewandowskiL.KeiserS. (1999). The LD label for relatively well-functioning students: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 485–490.
16.
GordonM.LewandowskiL.MurphyK.DempseyK. (2002). ADA-based accommodations in higher education: A survey of clinicians about documentation requirements and diagnostic standards. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 357–363.
17.
GreggN. (2007). Underserved and unprepared: Postsecondary learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 219–228.
18.
GreggN. (2009a). Accommodations: Evidence-based accommodation research specific to the adolescent and adult population with learning disabilities. In TaymensJ. (Ed.), Learning to achieve: A review of the research literature on serving adults with learning disabilities (pp. 119–180). Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
19.
GreggN. (2009b). Adolescents and adults with learning disabilities and ADHD: Assessment and accommodation. New York, NY: Guilford.
20.
GreggN. (2011). Increasing access to learning for the adult basic education learner with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 47–63.
21.
GreggN. (2012). Increasing access to learning for the adult basic education learner with learning disabilities: Evidence-based accommodation research. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 47–63.
22.
GreggN.ColemanC.DavisM.LindstromW.HartwigJ. (2006). Critical issues for the diagnosis of learning disabilities in the adult population. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 889–899.
23.
GreggN.LindstromJ. H. (2008). Accommodation of instructional and testing situations. In MorrisR. J.MatherN. (Eds.), Evidence-based interventions for students with learning and behavioral challenges (pp. 302–318). New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
GreggN.NelsonJ. M. (2012). Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of extra time as a test accommodation for transitioning adolescents with learning disabilities: More questions than answers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 128–138.
25.
HaleJ. B.NaglieriJ. A.KaufmanA. S.KavaleK. A. (2004). Specific learning disability classification in the new Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: The danger of good ideas. School Psychologist, 58, 6–13.
26.
HarrisonA. G. (2014). Assessment and accommodation of students with learning disabilities at the postsecondary level in Canada. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27, 3–11.
27.
HarrisonA. G.LovettB. J.GordonM. (2013). Documenting disabilities in postsecondary settings. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 28, 303–322.
28.
HeimanT.PrecelK. (2003). Students with learning disabilities in higher education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 248–258.
KaneS. T.WalkerJ. H.SchmidtG. R. (2011). Assessing college-level learning difficulties and “at riskness” for learning disabilities and ADHD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 533–542.
31.
KavaleK. A.FlanaganD. P. (2007). Ability–achievement discrepancy, response to intervention, and assessment of cognitive abilities/processes in specific learning disability identification. In JimersonS. R.BurnsM. K.Van Der HeydenA. (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention (pp. 130–147). New York, NY: Springer.
32.
LaiS. A.BerkeleyS. (2012). High-stakes accommodations: Research and practice. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 35, 158–169.
33.
LewandowskiL. J.CohenJ.LovettB. J. (2013). Effects of extended time allotments on reading comprehension performance of college students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 326–336.
34.
LewandowskiL. J.LambertT. L.LovettB. J.PanahonC. J.SytsmaM. R. (2014). College students’ preferences for test accommodations. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 29, 116–126.
35.
LewandowskiL. J.LovettB. J.GordonM. (2009). Measurement of symptom severity and impairment. In GoldsteinS.NaglieriJ. (Eds.), Assessing impairment (pp. 5–14). New York, NY: Springer.
36.
LewandowskiL. J.LovettB. J.RogersC. L. (2008). Extended time as a testing accommodation for students with reading disabilities: Does a rising tide lift all ships?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26, 315–324.
37.
LewandowskiL.WoodW.LambertT. (2014). Private room as a test accommodation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.911243
38.
LindstromJ. H. (2007). Determining appropriate accommodations for postsecondary students with reading and written expression disorders. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 229–236.
39.
LindstromJ. H. (2010). Mathematics assessment accommodations. Intervention in School and Clinic, 46, 1–12.
40.
LovettB. J. (2010). Extended time testing accommodations for students with disabilities: Answers to five fundamental questions. Review of Educational Research, 80, 611–638.
41.
LovettB. J. (2014). Testing accommodations under the Amended Americans with Disabilities Act: The voice of empirical research. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 25, 81–90.
42.
LovettB. J.GordonM.LewandowskiL. J. (2009). Measuring impairment in a legal context: Practical considerations in the evaluation of psychiatric and learning disabilities. In GoldsteinS.NaglieriJ. (Eds.), Assessing impairment (pp. 93–103). New York, NY: Springer.
43.
LovettB. J.NelsonJ. M.LindstromW. (2014). Documenting hidden disabilities in higher education: Analysis of recent guidance from the Association on Higher Education and Disability (AHEAD). Journal of Disability Policy Studies. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1044207314533383
44.
MadausJ. W.BanerjeeM.HambletE. C. (2010). Learning disability documentation decision making at the postsecondary level. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 33, 68–79.
45.
MillerL. A.LewandowskiL. J.AntshelK. M. (2013). Effects of extended time for college students with and without ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1087054713483308
46.
NewmanL.WagnerM.KnokeyA.MarderC.NagleK.ShaverD. . . . SchwartingM. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to eight years after high school: A report from the NLTS-2. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
47.
OfieshN. S. (2007). Math, science, and foreign language: Evidence-based accommodation decision making at the postsecondary level. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 237–245.
48.
OfieshN. S.BisagnoJ. M. (2008). Enduring and unresolved issues in the test accommodation decision process for individuals with learning disabilities: Test validity and documentation of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 15, 147–151.
49.
OfieshN. S.HughesC.ScottS. S. (2004). Extended test time and postsecondary students with learning disabilities: A model for decision making. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 19, 57–70.
50.
PhillipsS. E. (1994). High-stakes testing accommodations: Validity versus disabled rights. Applied Measurement in Education, 7, 93–120.
51.
RaueK.LewisL. (2011). Students with disabilities at degree-granting postsecondary institutions. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
52.
RobertsB. L. (2012). Beyond psychometric evaluation of the student-task determinants of accommodation: Why students with learning disabilitiesmaynot need to be accommodated. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 27, 72–80.
53.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, Pub. L. No. 93-112, 87 § 394 (1973).
54.
SharpeM. N.JohnsonD. R.IzzoM.MurrayA. (2005). An analysis of instructional accommodations and assistive technologies used by postsecondary graduates with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, 3–11.
55.
SparksR. L.LovettB. J. (2009a). College students with learning disability diagnoses: Who are they and how do they perform?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 494–510.
56.
SparksR. L.LovettB. J. (2009b). Objective criteria for classification of postsecondary students as learning disabled: Effects on prevalence rates and group characteristics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 230–239.
57.
SparksR. L.LovettB. J. (2013). Applying objective diagnostic criteria to students in a college support program for learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36, 231–241.
58.
SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L. (2002). Difference scores in the identification of children with learning disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 65–83.
59.
SwansonH. L. (2009). Assessment of adults with learning disabilities: A quantitative synthesis of similarities and differences. In TaymensJ. (Ed.), Learning to achieve: A review of the research literature on serving adults with learning disabilities (pp. 15–70). Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
60.
SwansonH. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of learning disabilities (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
61.
TaymansJ. M. (2012). Legal and definitional issues affecting the identification and education of adults with specific learning disabilities in adult education programs. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 5–16.
62.
TraininG.SwansonH. L. (2005). Cognition, metacognition, and achievement of college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 261–272.
63.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2010). Amendment of Americans with Disabilities Act Title II and III regulations to implement ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (28 CFR, Parts 35–36). Washington, DC: Author.
64.
VickersM. Z. (2010). Accommodating college students with learning disabilities. Raleigh, NC: Pope Center for Higher Education Policy.
65.
WeisR.SykesL.UnadkatD. (2011). Qualitative differences in learning disabilities across postsecondary institutions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 491–502.
