Children with specific learning disabilities (SLD) have deficits in the basic psychological processes that interfere with learning and academic achievement, and for some SLD subtypes, these deficits can also lead to emotional and/or behavior problems. This study examined psychosocial functioning in 123 students, aged 6 to 11, who underwent comprehensive evaluations for learning and/or behavior problems in two Pacific Northwest school districts. Using concordance-discordance model (C-DM) processing strengths and weaknesses SLD identification criteria, results revealed working memory SLD (n = 20), processing speed SLD (n = 30), executive SLD (n = 32), and no disability groups (n = 41). Of the SLD subtypes, repeated measures MANOVA results revealed the processing speed SLD subtype exhibited the greatest psychosocial and adaptive impairment according to teacher behavior ratings. Findings suggest processing speed deficits may be behind the cognitive and psychosocial disturbances found in what has been termed “nonverbal” SLD. Limitations, implications, and future research needs are addressed.
AnastasiA.UrbinaS. (1997). Psychological testing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
AndersonV.CatroppaC.GodfreyC.RosenfeldJ. V. (2012). Intellectual ability 10 years after traumatic brain injury in infancy and childhood: What predicts outcomes?Journal of Neurotrauma, 29(1), 143–153.
3.
BarthA. E.StuebingK. K.AnthonyJ. L.DentonC. A.MathesP. G.FletcherJ. M.FrancisD. J. (2008). Agreement among response to intervention criteria for identifying responder status. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 296–307.
4.
BennerG. J.AllorJ. H.MooneyP. (2008). An investigation of the academic processing speed of students with emotional and behavioral disorders served in public school settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 31(3), 307–332.
5.
BerningerV. W. (2006). Research-supported ideas for implementing reauthorized IDEA with intelligent professional psychological services. Psychology in the Schools, 43(7), 781–796.
6.
BoyleC. A.BouletS.SchieveL. A.CohenR. A.BlumbergS. J.Yeargin-AllsoppM.VisserS.KoganM. D. (2011). Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997–2008. Pediatrics, 127, 1034–1042.
7.
Brown-ChidseyR.SteegeM. W. (2005). Response to intervention: Principles and methods for effective practice. New York, NY: Guilford.
8.
BryanK. L.HaleJ. B. (2001). Differential effects of left and right cerebral vascular accidents on language competency. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 655–664.
9.
BullisM.YovanoffP. (2005). More alike than different? Comparison of formerly incarcerated youth with and without disabilities. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14(1), 127–139.
10.
ChapmanS. B.SparksG.LevinH. S.DennisM.RoncadinC.ZhangL.SongJ. (2004). Discourse macrolevel processing after severe pediatric traumatic brain injury. Developmental Neuropsychology, 25(1–2), 37–60.
11.
DeckerS. L.HaleJ. B.FlanaganD. P. (2013). Professional practice issues in the assessment of cognitive functioning for educational applications. Psychology in the Schools, 50(3), 300–313.
12.
DehnM. J. (2011). Working memory and academic learning: Assessment and intervention. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
13.
DennisM. (1991). Frontal lobe function in children and adolescents: A heuristic for assessing attention regulation, executive control, and the intentional states important for social discourse.Developmental Neuropsychology, 7, 327–358.
14.
DennisM.BarnesM. A. (2001). Comparison of literal, inferential, and intentional text comprehension in children with mild or severe closed-head injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16(5), 456–468.
15.
DiScalaC.OsbergJ. S.GansB. M.ChinL. J.GrandC. C. (1991). Children with traumatic head injury: Morbidity and post-acute treatment. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72(9), 662–666.
16.
DixonS. G.EusebioE. C.TurtonW. J.WrightP. W. D.HaleJ. B. (2011). Forest Grove School District v. T.A. Supreme Court case: Implications for school psychology practice. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(2), 103–113.
17.
DombrowskiS. C.KamphausR. W.ReynoldsC. R. (2004). After the demise of the discrepancy: Proposed learning disabilities diagnostic criteria. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 35, 364–372.
18.
ElliottC. D.HaleJ. B.FiorelloC. A.DorvilC.MoldovanJ. (2010). Differential Ability Scales–II prediction of reading performance: Global scores are not enough. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 698–720.
19.
Ewing-CobbsL.BarnesM.FletcherJ. M.LevinH. S.SwankP. R.SongJ. (2004). Modeling of longitudinal academic achievement scores after pediatric traumatic brain injury. Developmental Neuropsychology, 24, 669–704.
20.
FilleyC. M. (2005). White matter and behavioral neurology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1064, 162–183.
21.
FiorelloC. A.HaleJ. B.DeckerS. L.ColemanS. (2009). Neuropsychology in school psychology. In Garcia-VazquezE.CrespiT. D.RiccioC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of education, training, and supervision of school psychologists in school and community (Vol. 1, pp. 213–232). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
22.
FiorelloC. A.HaleJ. B.HoldnackJ. A.KavanaghJ. A.TerrellJ.LongL. (2007). Interpreting intelligence test results for children with disabilities: Is global intelligence relevant?Applied Neuropsychology, 14(1), 2–12.
23.
FiorelloC. A.HaleJ. B.SnyderL. E. (2006). Cognitive hypothesis testing and response to intervention for children with reading problems. Psychology in the Schools, 43(8), 835–853.
24.
FiorelloC. A.HaleJ. B.WycoffK. L. (2012). Cognitive hypothesis testing: Linking test results in the real world. In FlanaganD. P.HarrisonP. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed., pp. 484–496). New York, NY: Guilford.
25.
FischerK. W. (2009). Mind, brain, and education: Building a scientific groundwork for learning and teaching. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(1), 3–16.
26.
FlanaganD.FiorelloC.OrtizS. (2010). Enhancing practice through application of Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory and research: A “third method” approach to specific learning disability identification. Psychology in Schools, 47(7), 739–760.
27.
FlanaganD. P.OrtizS. O.AlfonsoV. C. (2013). Essentials of cross-battery assessment (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
28.
FlanaganD. P.OrtizS. O.AlfonsoV. C.DyndaA. M. (2006). Integration of response to intervention and norm-referenced tests in learning disability identification: Learning from the Tower of Babel. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 807–825.
29.
FletcherJ. M.ShaywitzS. E.ShankweilerD. P.KatzL.LibermanI. Y.StuebingK. K.. . . ShaywitzB. A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 1–18.
30.
ForrestB. J. (2004). The utility of math difficulties, internalized psychopathology, and visual-spatial deficits to identify children with the nonverbal learning disability syndrome: Evidence for a visuospatial disability. Child Neuropsychology, 10, 129–146.
31.
FuchsD.DeshlerD. D.ReschlyD. J. (2004). National Research Center on Learning Disabilities: Multimethod studies of identification and classification issues. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 189–196.
32.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L. (2004). Identifying reading disabilities by responsiveness-to-instruction: Specifying measures and criteria. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 216–227.
33.
FuerstD. R.FiskJ. L.RourkeB. P. (1989). Psychosocial functioning of learning disabled children: Replicability of statistically derived subtypes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 275–280.
34.
FuerstD. R.FiskJ. L.RourkeB. P. (1990). Psychosocial functioning of learning disabled children: Relations between WISC Verbal IQ-Performance IQ discrepancies and personality subtypes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 657–660.
35.
GalwayT. M.MetsalaJ. M. (2011). Social cognition and its relation to psychosocial adjustment in children with nonverbal learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(1), 33–49.
36.
GearyD. C. (2010). Mathematical disabilities: Reflections on cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 130–133.
37.
GoldbergE. (2001). The executive brain: Frontal lobes and the civilized mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
HainL. A.HaleJ. B. (2010). “Nonverbal” learning disabilities or Asperger syndrome? Clarification through cognitive hypothesis testing. In MatherN.JaffeL. E. (Eds.), Comprehensive evaluations: Case reports for psychologists, diagnosticians, and special educators (pp. 372–387). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
39.
HainL. A.HaleJ. B.Glass-KendorskiJ. (2009). Comorbidity of psychopathology in cognitive and academic SLD subtypes. In PfeiferS. G.RattanG. (Eds.), Emotional disorders: A neuropsychological, psychopharmacological, and educational perspective (pp. 199–226). Middletown, MD: School Neuropsychology Press.
40.
HaleJ. B.FiorelloC. A. (2004). School neuropsychology: A practitioner’s handbook. New York, NY: Guilford.
41.
HaleJ. B.FiorelloC. A.KavanaghJ. A.HoldnackJ. A.AloeA. M. (2007). Is the demise of IQ interpretation justified? A response to special issue authors. Applied Neuropsychology, 14, 37–51.
42.
HaleJ. B.FiorelloC. A.MillerJ. A.WenrichK.TeodoriA. M.HenzelJ. (2008). WISC-IV assessment and intervention strategies for children with specific learning disabilities. WISC-IV Clinical Assessment and Intervention, 2, 109–171.
43.
HaleJ. B.FlanaganD. P.NaglieriJ. A. (2008). Alternative research-based methods for IDEA 2004 identification of children with specific learning disabilities. Communiqué, 36(8), 1–17.
44.
HaleJ. B.HainL. A.MurphyR.CancelliereG. (2012). The enigma of learning disabilities: Examination via a neuropsychological framework. In NoggleC. A.DeanR. S. (Eds.), The neuropsychology of psychopathology (pp. 75–96). New York, NY: Springer.
45.
HaleJ. B.KaufmanA.NaglieriJ. A.KavaleK. (2006). Implementation of IDEA: Integrating response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 753–770.
46.
HaleJ. B.NaglieriJ. A.KaufmanA. S.KavaleK. A. (2004). Specific learning disability classification in the new Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: The danger of good ideas. School Psychologist, 58(1), 6–13.
47.
HaleJ. B.ReddyL. A.Semrud-ClikemanM.JonesN. (2011). Executive impairment determines ADHD medication response: Implications for academic achievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(2), 196–212.
48.
HaleJ. B.WycoffK. L.FiorelloC. A. (2010). RTI and cognitive hypothesis testing for specific learning disabilities identification and intervention: The best of both worlds. In FlanaganD.AlfonsoV. (Eds.), Essentials of specific learning disability identification (pp. 173–202). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
49.
HendriksenJ. G. M.KeulersE. H. H.FeronF. J. M.WassenbergR. W.JollesJ.VlesJ. S. H. (2007). Subtypes of learning disabilities: Neuropsychological and behavioural functioning of 495 children referred for multidisciplinary assessment. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 16, 517–524.
50.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004).
51.
KanaiC.TaniM.HashimotoR.YamadaT.OtaH.WatanabeH.. . . KatoN. (2012). Cognitive profiles of adults with Asperger’s disorder, high-functioning autism, and pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified based on the WAIS-III. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(1), 58–64.
52.
KarandeS.KulkarniM. (2005). Specific learning disability: The invisible handicap. Indian Pediatrician, 42, 315–319.
53.
KavaleK. A.KaufmanA. S.NaglieriJ. A.HaleJ. (2005). Changing procedures for identifying learning disabilities: The danger of poorly supported ideas. School Psychologist, 59, 16–25.
54.
KinnunenK. M.GreenwoodR.PowellJ. H.LeechR.HawkinsP. C.BonnelleV.. . . SharpD. J. (2011). White matter damage and cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury. Brain, 134(2), 449–463.
55.
KlinA.VolkmarF. R.SparrowS. S.CicchettiD. V.RourkeB. P. (1995). Validity and neuropsychological characterization of Asperger syndrome: Convergence with nonverbal learning disabilities syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36(7), 1127–1140.
56.
KoziolL. F.BuddingD. E. (2009). Subcortical structures and cognition: Implications for neuropsychological assessment. New York, NY: Springer.
57.
KoziolL. F.BuddingD. E.HaleJ. B. (2013). Understanding neuropsychopathology in the 21st century: Current status, clinical application, and future directions. In ReddyL. A.WeissmanA. S.HaleJ. B. (Eds.), Neuropsychological assessment and intervention for emotional and behavior disordered youth: A step-by-step evidence-based approach (pp. 324–346). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
58.
KrausM. F.SusmarasT.CaughlinB. P.WalkerC. J.SweeneyJ. A.LittleD. M. (2007). White matter integrity and cognition in chronic traumatic brain injury: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Brain, 130(10), 2508–2519.
59.
LovelandK. A.FletcherJ. M.BaileyV. (1990). Verbal and nonverbal communication of events in learning disability subtypes. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 12, 433–447.
60.
MammarellaI. C.CornoldiC. (2013). An analysis of the criteria used to diagnose children with Nonverbal Learning Disability (NLD). Child Neuropsychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/09297049.2013.796920.
61.
MascoloJ. T.KaufmanN. L.HaleJ. B. (2009). Illustrative case reports using the WISC-IV. In FlanaganD. P.KaufmanA. S. (Eds.), Essentials of WISC-IV assessment (2nd ed., pp. 468–515). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
62.
MathiasJ. L.BiglerE. D.JonesN. R.BowdenS. C.WoodbridgeM. B.BrownG. C.TaylorD. J. (2004). Neuropsychological and information processing performance and its relationship to white matter changes following moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: A preliminary study. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 11(3), 134–152.
63.
MattisonR. E.HooperS. R.CarlsonG. A. (2006). Neuropsychological characteristics of special education students with serious emotional/behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 31(2), 176–188.
64.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L. (2006). Frequency of reading, math, and writing disabilities in children with clinical disorders. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 145–157.
65.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L. (2008). WISC-IV and WIAT-II profiles in children with high functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(3), 428–439.
66.
McAlonanG. M.CheungC.CheungV.WongN.SucklingJ.ChuaS. E. (2009). Differential effects on white-matter systems in high-functioning autism and Asperger’s syndrome. Psychological Medicine, 39(11), 1885–1893.
67.
McGrewK. S.WendlingB. J. (2010). Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive-achievement relations: What we have learned from the past 20 years of research. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 651–675.
68.
NortonE.WolfM. (2012). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 427–452.
69.
NoterdaemeM.WriedtE.HöhneC. (2010). Asperger’s syndrome and high-functioning autism: Language, motor and cognitive profiles. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 19(6), 475–481.
70.
QuinnM. M.RutherfordR. B.LeoneP. E.OsherD. M.PoirierJ. M. (2005). Students with disabilities in detention and correctional settings. Exceptional Children, 71(3), 339–345.
71.
ReddyL. A.HaleJ. (2007). Inattentiveness. In EisenA. R. (Ed.), Treating childhood behavioral and emotional disorders: A step-by-step evidence-based approach (pp. 156–211). New York, NY: Guilford.
72.
ReschlyD. J. (2005). Learning disabilities identification: Primary intervention, secondary intervention, and then what?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 510–515.
73.
ReynoldsC. R.KamphausR. W. (2004). Behavior Assessment System for Children (2nd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
74.
RiccioC. A.SullivanJ. R.CohenM. J. (2010). Neuropsychological assessment and intervention for childhood and adolescent disorders. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
75.
RiccioC. A.WolfeM. E. (2003). Neuropsychological perspectives on the assessment of children. In ReynoldsC. E.KamphausR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Intelligence, aptitude, and achievement (pp. 305–324). New York, NY: Guilford.
76.
RourkeB. P. (1987). The syndrome of nonverbal learning disabilities: The final common pathway of white matter disease/dysfunction. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1, 209–234.
77.
RourkeB. P. (1988). The syndrome of nonverbal learning disabilities: Developmental manifestations in neurological disease, disorder, and dysfunction. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2, 293–330.
78.
RourkeB. P. (1989). Nonverbal learning disabilities: The syndrome and the model.New York: Guilford Press.
79.
RourkeB. P. (2000). Neuropsychological and psychosocial subtyping: A review of investigations within the University of Windsor Laboratory. Canadian Psychology, 41, 34–51.
80.
RourkeB. P. (2005). Neuropsychology of learning disabilities: Past and future. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(2), 111–114.
81.
RourkeB. P. (2008). Neuropsychology as a (psycho)social science: Implications for research and clinical practice. Canadian Psychology, 49, 35–41.
82.
RourkeB. P.FuerstD. R. (1991). Learning disabilities and psychosocial functioning: A neuropsychological perspective. New York, NY: Guildford.
83.
SchrankF. A.MillerJ. A.CateringL.DesrochersJ. (2006). American Academy of School Psychology survey on the independent educational evaluation for a specific learning disability: Results and discussion. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 771–780.
84.
Semrud-ClikemanM. (2001). Traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents: Assessment and intervention. New York, NY: Guilford.
85.
Semrud-ClikemanM. (2005). Neuropsychological aspects for evaluating learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 563–568.
86.
Semrud-ClikemanM.BledsoeJ. C. (2011). Traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents. In DavisA. S. (Ed.), Handbook of pediatric neuropsychology (pp. 963–977). New York, NY: Springer.
87.
Semrud-ClikemanM.KutzA.StrassnerE. (2005). Providing neuropsychological services to learners with traumatic brain injuries. In D’ AmatoR. C.Fletcher-JanzenE.ReynoldsC. R. (Eds.), Handbook of school neuropsychology (pp. 425–443). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
88.
Semrud-ClikemanM.WalkowiakJ.WilkinsonA.ChristopherG. (2010). Neuropsychological differences among children with Asperger syndrome, nonverbal learning disabilities, attention deficit disorder, and controls. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(5), 582–600.
89.
SiegelL. S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469–478.
90.
SpeeceD. (2005). Hitting the moving target known as reading development: Some thoughts on screening children for secondary interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(6), 487–493.
91.
SpekA. A.ScholteE. M.van Berckelaer-OnnesI. A. (2008). Brief report: The use of WAIS-III in adults with HFA and Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(4), 782–787.
StancinT.DrotarD.TaylorH. G.YeatesK. O.WadeS. L.MinichN. M. (2002). Health-related quality of life of children and adolescents after traumatic brain injury. Pediatrics, 109(E34), 1–8.
94.
StothersM. E.Oram-CardyJ. (2012). Oral language impairments in developmental disorders characterized by language strengths: A comparison of Asperger syndrome and nonverbal learning disabilities. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(1), 519–534.
95.
StrangJ. D.RourkeB. P. (1985). Adaptive behavior of children with specific arithmetic disabilities and associated neuropsychological abilities and deficits. In RourkeB. P. (Ed.), Neuropsychology of learning disabilities: Essentials of subtype analysis (pp. 302–378). New York, NY: Guilford.
96.
StraussE.ShermanE. M. S.SpreenO. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms and commentary (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
97.
TomlinsonC. A. (2012). What is differentiated instruction? In CallahanC. M.Hertberg-DavisH. L. (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education: Considering multiple perspectives (pp. 287–299). New York, NY: Routledge.
98.
TurkenA. U.Whitfield-GabrieliS.BammerR.BaldoJ. V.DronkersN. F.GabrieliJ. D. (2008). Cognitive processing speed and the structure of white matter pathways: Convergent evidence from normal variation and lesion studies. Neuroimage, 42(2), 1032–1044.
99.
VaughnS.DentonC. A.FletcherJ. M. (2010). Why intensive interventions are necessary for students with severe reading difficulties. Psychology in the Schools, 47(5), 432–444.
100.
VaughnS.FuchsL. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137–146.
101.
WaescheJ. S. B.SchatschneiderC.ManerJ. K.AhmedY.WagnerR. K. (2011). Examining agreement and longitudinal stability among traditional and RTI-based definitions of reading disability using the affected-status agreement statistic. Journal of learning disabilities, 44(3), 296–307.
102.
WatkinsM. W.GluttingJ. J.YoungstromE. A. (2005). Issue in subtest profile analysis. In FlanaganD.HarrisonP. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 251–268). New York: Guilford.
103.
WechslerD. (1991). Wechsler Intelligence Test for Children–Third Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
104.
WechslerD. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Test for Children–Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
105.
WilliamsD. L.GoldsteinG.KojkowskiN.MinshewN. J. (2008). Do individuals with high functioning autism have the IQ profile associated with nonverbal learning disability?Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2(2), 353–361.
106.
WillisJ. O.DumontR. (2006). And never the twain shall meet: Can response to intervention and cognitive assessment be reconciled?Psychology in the Schools, 43, 901–908.
107.
WodrichD. L.SpencerM. L.DaleyK. B. (2006). Combining RTI and psychoeducational assessment: What we must assume to do otherwise. Psychology in the Schools, 43(7), 797–806.
108.
Woodbury-SmithM. R.VolkmarF. R. (2009). Asperger syndrome. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 18(1), 2–11.
109.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
110.
WrightP. W.HaleJ. B.BackensonE. M.EusebioE. C.DixonS. G. (2013). Forest Grove v. T.A. Rejoiner to Zirkel: An attempt to profit from malfeasance?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(3), 317–324.
