Children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI) have demonstrated general spelling and writing difficulties. We investigated the sensitivity of children with SLI to the consistent spelling of root morphemes, a feature to which young typically developing children demonstrate sensitivity. We asked children with SLI and two groups of typically developing children (n = 17 in each group) to spell the same letter-sound sequence (e.g., win) as a root, and as a component of inflected, derived, and control words (e.g., win, wins, winner, wink). Children with SLI and spelling-age-matched children (mean age of 9 and 7 years, respectively) were more accurate and more consistent in spelling the initial sections of the inflected and derived words than of the control words, a pattern that suggests sensitivity to the representation of roots in spelling. The absence of a group-level interaction suggests comparable sensitivity in the two groups. Our results suggest that elementary-school-aged children with SLI are sensitive to the consistent spelling of roots, at least to the extent predicted by their general spelling abilities.
BishopD.AdamsC. (1990). A prospective study of the relationship between Specific Language Impairment, phonological disorders and reading retardation. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 1027–1050.
2.
BourassaD.TreimanR.KesslerB. (2006). Use of morphology in spelling by children with dyslexia and typically developing children. Memory & Cognition, 34, 703–714.
3.
BowersP. N.KirbyJ. R.DeaconS. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144–179.
4.
BrownL.SherbenouR. J.JohnsonS. K. (1990). Test of Nonverbal Intelligence manual (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: ProEd.
5.
CarlisleF. (1988). Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth and eighth graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 247–266.
6.
ChomskyN.HalleM. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
7.
ClarkE. V. (1993). The lexicon in acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
DeaconS. H.BryantP. (2006). Getting to the root: Young writers’ sensitivity to the role of root morphemes in the spelling of inflected and derived words. Journal of Child Language, 33, 401–417.
9.
DeaconS. H.DhoogeS. (2010). Developmental stability and changes in the impact of root consistency on children’s spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 1055–1069.
10.
DockrellJ.LindsayG.ConnellyV. (2009). The impact of specific language impairment on adolescents’ written text. Exceptional Children, 75, 427–446.
11.
DockrellJ.LindsayG.ConnellyV.MackieC. (2007). Constraints in the production of written text in children with Specific Language Impairments. Exceptional Children, 73, 147–164.
12.
GoodwinA.AhnS. (2010). A meta-analysis of morphological interventions: Effects on literacy achievement of children with literacy difficulties. Annals of Dyslexia, 60, 183–208.
13.
KempN. (2006). Children’s spelling of base, inflected, and derived words: Links with morphological awareness. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 737–765.
14.
LeonardL. (1998). Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15.
LeonardL.EyerJ.BedoreL.GrelaB. (1997). Three accounts of the grammatical morpheme difficulties of English-speaking children with Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 741–753.
16.
MackieC.DockrellJ. (2004). The nature of written language deficits in children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1469–1483.
17.
MarshallC. R.van der LelyH. K. J. (2007a). Derivational morphology in children with grammatical-specific language impairment. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 21(2), 71–91.
18.
MarshallC. R.van der LelyH. K. J. (2007b). The impact of phonological complexity on past tense inflection in children with Grammatical-SLI. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 191–203.
19.
McGrathL. M.Hutaff-LeeC.ScottA.BoadaR.ShribergL. D.PenningtonB. F. (2008). Children with comorbid Speech Sound Disorder and Specific Language Impairment are at increased risk for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 151–163.
OettingJ. B.HadleyP. A. (2009). Morphosyntax in child language disorders. In SchwartzR. G. (Ed.), Handbook of child language disorders (pp. 341–364). New York: Psychological Press.
22.
PactonS.DeaconS. H. (2008). The timing and mechanisms of children’s use of morphological information in spelling: A review of evidence from French and English. Cognitive Development, 23, 339–359.
23.
ReedD. K. (2008). A synthesis of morphology interventions and effects on reading outcomes for students in Grades K-12. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 36–49.
24.
RobertsM. J.RussoR. (1999). A student’s guide to analysis of variance. London: Routledge.
25.
RubinH. (1988). Morphological knowledge and early writing ability. Language and Speech, 31(4), 337–355.
26.
RubinH.PattersonP.KantorM. (1991). Morphological development and writing ability in children and adults. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 22, 228–235.
27.
SangsterL.DeaconS. H. (2011). Development in children’s sensitivity to the role of derivations in spelling. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(2), 133–139.
28.
SchwartzR. G. (2009). Specific language impairment. In SchwartzR. G. (Ed.), Handbook of child language disorders (pp. 3–43). New York: Psychological Press.
29.
ScottC.WindsorJ. (2000). General language performance measures in spoken and written discourse produced by school-age children with and without language and learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 324–339.
30.
SemelE.WiigE.SecordW. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals–4 (CELF-4). San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp.
31.
SnowlingM.BishopD.StothardS. (2000). Is preschool language impairment a risk factor for dyslexia in adolescence?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 587–600.
32.
TreimanR.CassarM.ZukowskiA. (1994). What types of linguistic information do children use in spelling? The case of flaps. Child Development, 65, 1318–1337.
33.
TylerA. A.LewisK. E.HaskillA.TolbertL. C. (2002). Efficacy and cross-domain effects of a morphosyntax and a phonology intervention. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 33, 52–66.
34.
TylerA. A.LewisK. E.HaskillA.TolbertL. C. (2003). Outcomes of different speech and language goal attack strategies. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1077–1094.
35.
TylerA.NagyW. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 649–667.
36.
UttlB. (2005). Measurements of individual differences: Lessons from memory assessment in research and clinical practice. Psychological Science, 16(6), 460–467.
WindsorJ.ScottC.StreetC. (2000). Verb and noun morphology in the spoken and written language of children with language learning disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 1322–1336.
39.
ZenoM.IvensH.MillardT.DuvvuriR. (1995). The educator’s word frequency guide. New York: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.
