In this longitudinal study, we investigated the role of word reading and mathematical difficulties measured in 9th grade as factors for receiving educational support for learning in upper secondary education in Grades 10 to 12 (from ages 16 to 19) and furthermore as predictors of dropout from upper secondary education within 5 years after compulsory education. In addition, we studied the role of school achievement in Grades 9 and 11 in this prediction. The participants of this study were members of one age group of 16-year-old ninth graders (N = 595, females 302, males 293) in a midsized Finnish city, who were followed for 5 years after completing compulsory education. The path model results, where the effects of gender, educational track, and SES were controlled, showed, first, that students with academic learning difficulties received educational support for learning particularly in the 11th grade. Second, academic learning difficulties directly affected school achievement in the 9th grade, but no longer in the 11th grade. Third, mathematical difficulties directly predicted dropout from upper secondary education, and difficulties in both word reading and mathematics had an indirect effect through school achievement in Grades 9 and 11 on dropout.
BadianN. A. (1999). Reading disability defined as a discrepancy between listening and reading comprehension: A longitudinal study of stability, gender differences, and prevalence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(2), 138–148.
2.
BarbaresiW. J.KatusicS. K.ColliganR. C.WeaverA. L.JacobsenS. J. (2005). Math learning disorder: Incidence in a population-based birth cohort, 1976–82, Rochester, Minn. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 5(5), 281–289. doi:10.1367/A04-209R.1
3.
BearG. G.KorteringL. J.BrazielP. (2006). School completers and noncompleters with learning disabilities: Similarities in academic achievement and perceptions of self and teachers. Remedial and Special Education, 27(5), 293–300.
4.
CalhoonM. B.EmersonR. W.FloresM.HouchinsD. E. (2007). Computational fluency performance profile of high school students with mathematics disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 28(5), 292–303.
5.
ChenW.GregoryA. (2009). Parental involvement as a protective factor during the transition to high school. Journal of Educational Research, 103(1), 53–62.
DelazerM.GirelliL.GranàA.DomahsF. (2003). Number processing and calculation—Normative data from healthy adults. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17(3), 331–350.
8.
DeshlerD. D.HockM. F. (2007). Adolescent literacy: Where we are, where we need to go. In PressleyM.BillmanA. K.PerryK. H. (Eds.), Shaping literacy achievement: Research we have, research we need (pp. 98–128). New York, NY: Guilford.
9.
DubowE. F.BoxerP.RowellL. (2009). Long-term effects of parents’ education on children’s educational and occupational success. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 55(3), 224–249.
10.
DunnC.ChambersD.RabrenK. (2004). Variables affecting students’ decisions to drop out of school. Remedial and Special Education, 25(5), 314–323.
Finnish National Board of Education. (2003). Lukion opetussuunnitelman perusteet 2003 [The grounds of curriculum of general upper secondary academic education 2003]. Vammala, Finland: Vammalan Kirjapaino Oy.
FloydR. G.KeithT. Z.TaubG. E.McGrewK. S. (2007). Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive abilities and their effects on reading decoding skills: G has indirect effects, more specific abilities have direct effects. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(2), 200–233.
16.
GearyD. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1539–1552.
17.
GerstenR.JordanN. C.FlojoJ. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293–304.
18.
HautamäkiJ.KuuselaJ. (2004). Diagnostisen päättelemisen pulmista ja keinoista—matemaattiset oppimisvaikeudet [About the problems and expedients of diagnostic deduction—mathematical learning difficulties]. In RäsänenP.KupariP.AhonenT.MalinenP. (Eds.), Matematiikka—näkökulmia opettamiseen ja oppimiseen [Mathematics—views for teaching and learning] (pp. 255–273). Jyväskylä, Finland: Niilo Mäki Instituutti.
19.
HawkeJ. L.OlsonR. K.WillcutE. G.WadsworthS. J.DeFriesJ. C. (2009). Gender ratios for reading difficulties. Dyslexia, 15(3), 239–242.
20.
HolopainenL.KairaluomaL.NevalaJ.AhonenT.AroM. (2004). Lukivaikeuksien seulontatesti nuorille ja aikuisille [Dyslexia screening test for youth and adults]. Jyväskylä, Finland: Jyväskylän yliopistopaino.
21.
HolopainenL.SavolainenH. (2006). The role of dyslexia as a predictor of educational and occupational career. In RuohoK. (Ed.), Tehtävänä erityispedagoginen näkökulma: tutkimusta Erityiskasvatuksen laitoksella [Pedagogic point of view of special education as an assignment: Research in the department of special education] (Bulletins of the Faculty of Education No. 97, pp. 17–44). Joensuu, Finland: University of Joensuu.
22.
IkäheimoH.PutkonenH.VoutilainenE. (2002). MAKEKO: Matematiikan keskeisen oppiaineksen kokeet luokille 1–9 [Mathematical skill tests for Grades 1–9]. Helsinki, Finland: Opperi.
23.
JahnukainenM.JärvinenT. (2005). Risk factors and survival routes: Social exclusion as a life-historical phenomenon. Disability & Society, 20(6), 669–682. doi:10.1080/09687590500249090
24.
KorteringL. J.ChristensonS. (2009). Engaging students in school and learning: The real deal for school completion. Exceptionality, 17(1), 5–15.
25.
KovasY.HaworthC. M. A.PetrillS. A.PlominR. (2007). Mathematical ability of 10-year-old boys and girls: Genetic and environmental etiology of typical and low performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(6), 554–567.
26.
KupariP. (2005). Kotitausta näkyy matematiikan oppimistuloksissa [Family background has an impact on mathematical performance]. In KupariP.VälijärviJ. (Eds.), Osaaminen kestävällä pohjalla. PISA 2003 Suomessa [Know-how on a solid ground. PISA 2003 in Finland] (pp. 115–126). Jyväskylä, Finland: Gummerus.
27.
LanderlK.WimmerH. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 150–161.
28.
LimbrickL.WheldallK.MadetaineA. (2010). Estimating gender ratios of poor reading using large-scale assessments. Australian Journal of Education, 54(2), 190–222.
29.
LundetræK. (2011). Does parental educational level predict drop-out from upper secondary school for 16- to 24-year-olds when basic skills are accounted for? A cross country comparison. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 55(6), 625–637. doi:10.1080/00313831.2011.555925
30.
LuytenH.ten BruggencateG. (2011). The presence of Matthew effects in Dutch primary education, development of language skills over a six-year period. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(5), 444–458. doi:10.1177/0022219411410289
31.
LyonG. R.ShaywitzS. E.ShaywitzB. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14.
32.
MabbottD. J.BisanzJ. (2008). Computational skills, working memory, and conceptual knowledge in older children with mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(1), 15–28.
33.
MaughanB.MesserJ.CollishawS.PicklesA.SnowlingM.YuleW.RutterM. (2009). Persistence of literacy problems: Spelling in adolescence and at mid-life. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 50(8), 893–901. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02079.x
34.
MazzoccoM. M. M. (2007). Defining and differentiating mathematical learning disabilities and difficulties. In BerchD. B.MazzoccoM. M. M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 29–47). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
35.
McCloskeyM. (2009). Quantitative literacy and developmental dyscalculias. In BerchD. B.MazzoccoM. M. M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 415–429). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
36.
McNultyM. A. (2003). Dyslexia and the life course. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(4), 363–381.
37.
MeelissenM.LuytenH. (2008). The Dutch gender gap in mathematics: Small for achievement, substantial for beliefs and attitudes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34(2), 82–93. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2008.04.004
38.
Ministry of Education. (1998). Laki ammatillisesta koulutuksesta (630/1998) [Law of vocational education (630/1998)]. Retrieved from http://finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/1998/19980630
39.
Ministry of Education. (2002). Ehdotus erityisopetuksen strategiaksi toisen asteen ammatilliseen koulutukseen [Proposal for a strategy for special needs education in vocational education] (Memorandum of Work Groups of Ministry of Education No. 6:2002). Helsinki, Finland: Yliopistopaino.
40.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
41.
NCVER. (2011). Research messages 2011. Australia, Adelaide. Retrieved from http://www.ncver.edu.au
42.
ReschlyA. L.ChristensonS. L. (2006). Prediction of dropout among students with mild disabilities: A case for the inclusion of student engagement variables. Remedial and Special Education, 27(5), 276–292.
43.
RobinsonJ. P.LubienskiS. T. (2011). The development of gender achievement gaps in mathematics and reading during elementary and middle school: Examining direct cognitive assessments and teacher ratings. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 268–302. doi:10.3102/0002831210372249
44.
RoyerJ. M.WallesR. (2009). Influences of gender, ethnicity, and motivation on mathematical performance. In BerchD. B.MazzoccoM. M. M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 349–367). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
45.
SavolainenH.AhonenT.AroM.TolvanenA.HolopainenL. (2008). Reading comprehension, word reading and spelling as predictors of school achievement and choice of secondary education. Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 201–210.
46.
ScanlonD.MellardD. F. (2002). Academic and participation profiles of school-age dropouts with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 68(2), 239–258.
47.
ShaywitzS. E.FletcherJ. M. (1999). Persistence of dyslexia: The Connecticut longitudinal study at adolescence. Pediatrics, 104(6), 1351–1359.
48.
SiegelL. S.SmytheI. S. (2005). Reflections on research on reading disability with special attention to gender issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(5), 473–477.
49.
SieglerR. S. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23(7), 691–697.
50.
SirinS. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. doi:10.3102/00346543075003417
51.
Statistics Finland. (2005). Vuoden 2004 peruskoulun päättäneistä jatkoi opiskelua samana vuonna 95 prosenttia, ylioppilaista 40 prosenttia [Ninety-five percent of completers of the 9th grade of comprehensive school in 2004 continued studies in the same year, the corresponding figure for passers of the matriculation examination was 40 percent]. Retrieved from http://www.tilastokeskus.fi/til/khak/2004/khak_2004_2005-12-16_tie_001.html
52.
Statistics Finland. (2006). Ulkomaalaiset (ulkomaan kansalaiset) opiskelijat koulutussektoreittain maanosan mukaan 2004 [Foreign (foreign national) students by education sector according to continent]. Retrieved from http://www.stat.fi/til/opiskt/tau.html
TaipaleA. (2009). Matematiikan, lukemisen ja kirjoittamisen vaikeuksien päällekkäistyminen nuoruusiässä [Comorbidity of difficulties in mathematics, reading and spelling in adolescence] (Publications in Education No. 135). Joensuu, Finland: University of Joensuu.
57.
TaubG. E. (2008). Effects of general and broad cognitive abilities on mathematics achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(2), 187–198.
58.
TestD. W.FowlerC. H.WhiteJ.RichterS.WalkerA. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition practices for enhancing school completion. Exceptionality, 17(1), 16–29.
59.
TunmerW.GreaneyK. (2010). Defining dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(3), 229–243.
60.
UndheimA. M. (2009). A thirteen-year follow-up study of young Norwegian adults with dyslexia in childhood: Reading development and educational levels. Dyslexia, 15(4), 291–303. doi:10.1002/dys.384
61.
VälijärviJ.KupariP.LinnakyläP.ReinikainenP.SulkunenS.TörnroosJ.ArffmanI. (2007). The Finnish success in PISA—and some reasons behind it. PISA 2003. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä, Institute for Educational Research.
62.
VaughnS.FletcherJ. M.FrancisD. J.DentonC. A.WanzekJ.WexlerJ.RomainM. A. (2008). Response to intervention with older students with reading difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(3), 338–345.
