At the Intersection of Math and Reading Disabilities

Abstract

Individuals with comorbid disabilities in mathematics and reading face significant challenges in acquiring the componential skills related to each domain. Persons with these comorbid conditions are significantly understudied and this paucity of work limits how effective practitioners can be at addressing the needs of this population. In the United States, roughly 7% of all children suffer from math disability; of these, an estimated 17% to 66% also has a comorbid reading disability. Underspecification of current conceptualizations of math and reading disabilities, including how to best identify and classify individuals with one or more of these disabilities, hampers our efforts to intervene effectively. To conceptualize how to move forward in these areas, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development held a workshop focused on examining the etiology, classification, and remediation of comorbid math and reading disabilities. This special issue, titled At the Intersection of Math and Reading Disabilities, continues that discussion. Contributing authors articulate a path forward to address the needs of these learners and inform the foundational understanding of both conditions in isolation and as they interact.

Keywords

math reading learning disabilities comorbidity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ashkenazi

Black

Abrams

Hoeft

Menon

. (2013). Neurobiological underpinnings of math and reading learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 549–569.

Badian

(1999). Persistent arithmetic, reading, or arithmetic and reading disability. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 45–70.

Barbaresi

Katusic

Colligan

Weaver

Jacobsen

(2005). Math learning disorder: Incidence in a population-based birth cohort, 1976–1982, Rochester, Minn. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 5, 281–289.

Branum-Martin

Fletcher

Stuebing

(2013). Classification and identification of reading and math disabilities: The special case of comorbidity. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 490–499.

Butterworth

Varma

Laurillard

(2011). Dyscalculia: From brain to education. Science, 332(6033), 1049–1053. doi:10.1126/science.1201536

Dirks

Spyer

van Lieshout

de Sonneville

(2008). Prevalence of combined reading and arithmetic disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 460–473.

Fletcher

Lyon

G. R.

Fuchs

L. S.

Barnes

(2007). Learning disabilities: From identification to intervention. New York, NY: Guilford.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

(2002). Mathematical problem solving profiles of students with mathematics disabilities with and without comorbid reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 563–574.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Compton

(2012). The early prevention of mathematics difficulty: Its power and limitations. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 257–269.

10.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Compton

(2013). Intervention effects for students with comorbid forms of learning disability: Understanding the needs of nonresponders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 534–548.

11.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Prentice

(2004). Responsiveness to mathematical problem-solving instruction: Comparing students at risk of mathematics disability with and without risk of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 293–306.

12.

Fuchs

L. S.

Powell

S. R.

Seethaler

P. M.

Cirino

P. T.

Fletcher

J. M.

Fuchs

Zumeta

R. O

. (2009). Remediating number combination and word problem deficits among students with mathematics difficulties: A randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 561–576.

13.

Fuchs

L. S.

Powell

S. R.

Seethaler

P. M.

Fuchs

Hamlett

C. L.

Cirino

P. T.

Fletcher

J. M.

(2010). A framework for remediating the number combination deficits of students with mathematics difficulty. Exceptional Children, 76, 135–156.

14.

Geary

D. C.

Hamson

C. O.

Hoard

M. K.

(2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: A longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 236–263.

15.

Goldston

Walsh

Arnold

E. M.

Reboussin

Daniel

S. S.

Erkanli

Wood

F. B

. (2007). Reading problems, psychiatric disorders, and functional impairment from mid- to late adolescence. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 25–32.

16.

Hanich

L. B.

Jordan

N. C.

Kaplan

Dick

(2001). Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 615–626.

17.

Joint Economic Committee Chairman’s Staff. (2012 April). STEM education: Preparing for the jobs of the future. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?a=Files.Serve&File_id=6aaa7e1f-9586-47be-82e7-326f47658320

18.

Jordan

Kaplan

Hanich

(2002). Achievement growth in children with learning difficulties in mathematics: Findings of a two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Education Psychology, 94, 586–597.

19.

Lewis

Hitch

Walker

(1994). The prevalence of specific arithmetic difficulties and specific reading difficulties in 9- to 10-year-old boys and girls. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 283–292.

20.

Mazzocco

Grimm

(2013). Growth in rapid automatized naming from grades K to 8 in children with math or reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 517–533.

21.

Morris

Stuebing

K. K.

Fletcher

J. M.

Shaywitz

S. E.

Lyon

G. R.

Shankweiler

D. P.

Shaywitz

B. A

. (1998). Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 347–373.

22.

National Academies of Sciences. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century: An Agenda for American Science and Technology, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press.

23.

National Academies of Sciences. (2010). Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching category 5. Washington, DC: Members of the 2005 Rising Above the Gathering Storm Committee; Prepared for the Presidents of the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press.

24.

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards. Washington, DC: Author.

25.

O’Connor

Fuchs

L. S.

(2013). Responsiveness to intervention in the elementary grades: Implications for early childhood education. In Buysse

Peisner-Feinberg

Cantler

(Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention in early childhood education (pp. 41–56). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

26.

Plomin

Kovas

(2005). Generalist genes and learning disabilities. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 592–617.

27.

Powell

S. R.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Cirino

P. T.

Fletcher

J. M.

(2008). Do word problem features differentially affect problem difficulty as a function of students’ mathematics difficulty with and without reading difficulty? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 99–110.

28.

Powell

S. R.

Fuchs

L. S.

Fuchs

Cirino

P. T.

Fletcher

J. M.

(2009). Effects of fact retrieval tutoring on third-grade students with math difficulties with and without reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 1–11.

29.

Shaywitz

(2005). Dyslexia (specific reading disability). Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1301–1309.

30.

Torgesen

J. K.

(2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55–64.

31.

Wagner

Torgesen

(1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.

32.

Wanzek

Vaughn

(2009). Students demonstrating persistent low response to reading intervention: Three case studies. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 151–163.

33.

Willcutt

E. G.

Betjemann

R. S.

McGrath

L. M.

Chhabildas

N. A.

Olson

R. K.

DeFries

J. C.

Pennington

B. F.

(2010). Etiology and neuropsychology of comorbidity between RD and ADHD: The case for multiple-deficit models. Cortex, 46, 1345–1361.

34.

Willcutt

E. G.

Pennington

B. F.

(2000). Psychiatric comorbidity in children and adolescents with reading disability. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 1039–1048.

35.

Willcutt

E. G.

Pennington

B. F.

Duncan

Smith

S. D.

Keenan

J. M.

Wadsworth

Olson

R. K.

(2010). Understanding the complex etiologies of developmental disorders: Behavioral and molecular genetic approaches. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 31, 533–544.

36.

Willcutt

E. G.

Pennington

B. F.

Olson

DeFries

(2007). Understanding comorbidity: A twin study of reading disability and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B (Neuropsychiatric Genetics), 144B, 709–714.

37.

Willcutt

E. G.

Petrill

S. A.

Boada

DeFries

J. C.

Olson

R. K.

Pennington

B. F

. (2013). Comorbidity between reading disability and math disability: Concurrent psychopathology, functional impairment, and neuropsychological functioning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 500–516.