The longitudinal prediction of reading problems from fourth grade to sixth grade was investigated with a sample of 173 students. Reading problems at the end of sixth grade were defined by significantly below average performance (≤ 15th percentile) on reading factors defining word reading, fluency, and reading comprehension. Sixth grade poor reader status was predicted by fall of fourth grade passage reading fluency, spelling fluency, and the number of reading problems identified by teachers. Reading fluency and spelling fluency were significant predictors in logistic regression equation that combined to yield a screening battery with an area under the curve of .91. These results suggest that brief assessments of reading and spelling fluency in fourth grade may be able to identify students in middle childhood who have a reading problem or who are at risk for experiencing reading problems in sixth grade.
AdolfS. M.CattsH. W.LessJ. (2010). Kindergarten predictors of second versus eighth grade reading comprehension impairments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 332–345. doi:10.1177/0022219410369067
2.
BerkeleyS.BenderW. N.PeasterL. G.SaundersL. (2009). Implementation of response to intervention: A snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 85–95. doi:10.1177/0022219408326214
3.
BerningerV.NielsenK.AbbottR.WijsmanE.RaskindW. (2008). Writing problems in developmental dyslexia: Underrecognized and under-treated. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 1–21.
4.
CantwellD. P.BakerL. (1991). Association between attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disorders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 88–95.
5.
CattsH. W.ComptonD. L.TomblinJ. B.BridgesM. S. (2012). Prevalence and nature of late-emerging poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 166–181. doi:10.1037/a0025323
6.
ComptonD. L.FuchsD.FuchsL. S.EllemanA. M.GilbertJ. K. (2008). Tracking children who fly below the radar: Latent transition modeling of students with late-emerging reading disability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 329–337.
7.
ComreyA. L.LeeH. B. (1992). A first course factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
DallyK. (2006). The influence of phonological processing and inattentive behavior on reading acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 420–437.
9.
DuPaulG. J.PowerT.AnastopoulosA.ReidR. (1998). ADHD Rating Scale–IV. New York, NY: Guilford.
10.
DuPaulG. J.VolpeR. J.JitendraA. K.LutzJ. G.LorahK. S.GruberR. (2004). Elementary school students with AD/HD: Predictors of academic achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 285–301.
11.
EhriL. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In PerfettiC.RiebenL.FayolM. (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory and practice across languages (pp. 237–269). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
FabrigarL. R.WegenerD. T.MacCallumR. C.StrahanE. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45–58.
15.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.AllinderR. M. (1991). Effects of expert system advice within curriculum-based measurement on teacher planning and student achievement in spelling. School Psychology Review, 20, 49–66.
16.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.HospM. K.JenkinsJ. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.
GreshamF. M.ReschlyD. J.CareyM. P. (1987). Teachers as “tests”: Classification accuracy and concurrent validation in the identification of learning disabled children. School Psychology Review, 16, 543–553.
19.
HogeR. D.ColadarciT. (1989). Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 59, 297–313.
20.
HosmerD. W.LemeshowS. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
21.
JenkinsJ. R.HudsonR. F.JohnsonE. S. (2007). Screening for at-risk readers in a response to intervention framework. School Psychology Review, 36, 582–600.
22.
JenkinsJ. R.JewelM. (1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 57, 421–432.
23.
JuelC.GriffithP. L.GoughP. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243–255.
MacGinitieW. H.MacGinitieR. K.MariaK.DreyerL. G. (2000). Gates–MacGinitie Reading Tests, Fourth Edition, Grades 4 and 6, Forms S and T. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
26.
MantzicopoulosP.MorrisonD. (1994). Early prediction of reading achievement: Exploring the relationship of cognitive and noncognitive measures to inaccurate classification of at-risk students. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 244–245.
27.
MarstonD. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In ShinnM. R. (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement (pp. 18–78). New York, NY: Guilford.
28.
MatherN.HammillD. D.AllenE. A.RobertsR. (2004). Test of Silent Word Reading Fluency: Examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
29.
McGlincheyM. T.HixsonM. D. (2004). Using curriculum based measurement to predict performance on state assessments of reading. School Psychology Review, 33, 193–203.
30.
McKinneyJ. D.MasonJ.PerkersonK.CliffordM. (1975). The relationship between classroom behavior and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 198–203.
31.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Authors.
32.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: Institute on Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard
33.
OlsonR.ForsbergH.WiseB.RackJ. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In LyonG. R. (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities (pp. 243–277). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
34.
ScarboroughH. S.CuttingL. E.SpeeceD. L.SabatiniJ. P.OlsonR. K.DencklaM. B. (2008, April). Can taking a cheap and easy route get the job done? Using quick group tasks to screen for reading disability. Paper presented at the IES/ETS Conference on Assessing Reading in the 21st Century, Philadelphia, PA.
35.
SemelE.WiigE.SecordW. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp.
36.
SpeeceD. L.RitcheyK. D.SilvermanR.SchatschneiderC.WalkerC.AndrusikK. (2010). Identifying children in middle childhood who are at risk for reading problems. School Psychology Review, 39, 258–276.
37.
SpeeceD. L.SchatschneiderC.SilvermanR.CaseL. P.CooperD. H.JacobsD. (2011). Identification of reading problems in first grade within a response-to-intervention framework. Elementary School Journal, 111, 585–606.
38.
StageS. A.AbbottR. D.JenkinsJ. R.BerningerV. W. (2003). Predicting response to early reading intervention from verbal IQ, reading-related language abilities, attention ratings, and verbal IQ-word reading discrepancy: Failure to validate discrepancy method. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 24–33. doi:10.1177/00222194030360010401
39.
StageS. A.JacobsenD. M. (2001). Predicting student success on a state-mandated performance-based assessment suing oral reading fluency. School Psychology Review, 30, 407–419.
40.
SwetsJ. A. (1986). Indices of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy: Their ROCs and implied models. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 100–117.
41.
TaylorH.AnselmoM.ForemanA. L.SchatschneiderC.AngelopoulosJ. (2000). Utility of kindergarten teacher judgments in identifying early learning problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 200–210.
42.
TeiselJ. T.MazzoccoM. M.MyersG. F. (2001). The utility of kindergarten teacher ratings for predicting low academic achievement in first grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 286–293.
43.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency: Examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
44.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A.RoseE.LindamoodP.ConwayT.GarvinC. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1–15.
45.
VaughnS.Linan-ThompsonS.HickmanP. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391–409.
46.
VellutinoF. R.ScanlonD. M.SipayE. R.SmallS. G.PrattA.ChenR.DencklaM. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–637.
47.
VolpeR. J.DuPaulG. J.DiPernaJ. C.JitendraA. K.LutzJ. G.TrescoK.JunodR. V. (2006). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and scholastic achievement: A model of mediation via academic enablers. School Psychology Review, 35, 47–61.
48.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing: Examiner manual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
49.
WolfM.DencklaM. B. (2005). Rapid Automatized Naming and Rapid Alternating Stimulus Tests: Examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
50.
WoodcockR.McGrewK.MatherN.SchrankF. (2001). Woodcock–Johnson Tests of Achievement, Third Edition. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
51.
ZirkelP.DavisL. B. (2010). State laws for RTI: An updated snapshot. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(3), 56–63.
