This study investigated the rate of school-aged Chinese–English language learners at risk for reading difficulties in either Chinese or English only, or both, among second and fifth graders in Hong Kong. In addition, we examined the metalinguistic skills that distinguished those who were poor in reading Chinese from those who were poor in reading English. The prevalence of poor English readers among children identified to be poor in Chinese word recognition across the five participating schools was approximately 42% at Grade 2 and 57% at Grade 5. Across grades, children who were poor readers of both languages tended to have difficulties in phonological and morphological awareness. Poor readers of English only were found to manifest significantly poorer phonological awareness, compared to those who were poor readers of Chinese only; their average tone awareness score was also lower relative to normally developing controls. Apart from indicating possible dissociations between Chinese first language (L1) word reading and English second language (L2) word reading, these findings suggested that the degree to which different metalinguistic skills are important for reading in different writing systems may depend on the linguistic features of the particular writing system.
BauerR. S.BenedictP. K. (1997). Modern Cantonese Phonology. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
2.
BentT.BradlowA. R.WrightB. (2006). The influence of linguistic experience on the cognitive processing of pitch in speech and non-speech sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 97–103.
3.
BialystokE.HakutaK. (1994). In other words: The psychology and science of second language acquisition. New York, NY: Basic Books.
4.
BialystokE.HakutaK. (1998). Confounded age: Linguistic and cognitive factors in age differences for second language acquisition. In BirdsongD. P. (Ed.), New perspectives on the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition (pp. 119). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
BialystokE.LukG. (2007). The universality of symbolic representation of reading in Asian and Alphabetic languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 121–129.
6.
BolgerD. J.PerfettiC. A.SchneiderW. (2005). A cross-cultural effect on the brain revisited: Universal structures plus writing system variation. Journal of Human Brain Mapping, 25(1), 83–91.
7.
BurnhamD.KimJ.DavisC.CioccaV.SchoknechtC.KasisopaB. (2011). Are tones phones?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 693–712. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.008
8.
ChanM.-K. K. (2008). The perception and production of lexical stress by Cantonese speakers of English (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
9.
ChaoY. R. (1930). A system of tone letters. Le Maitre Phonetique, 45, 24–27.
10.
CheungH.ChungK. K. H.WongS. W. L.McBride-ChangC.PenneyT. B.HoC. S. H. (2009). Perception of tone and aspiration contrasts in Chinese children with dyslexia. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(6), 726–733.
11.
ChungK.McBride-ChangC.WongS.CheungH.PenneyT.HoC. (2008). The role of visual and auditory temporal processing for Chinese children with developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 58(1), 15–35. doi:10.1007/s11881-008-0015-4
12.
CioccaV.LuiJ. Y. K. (2003). The development of the perception of Cantonese lexical tones. Journal of Multicultural Communication Disorders, 1, 141–147.
13.
CookV. J.BassettiB. (2005). Introduction to researching second language writing systems. In CookV. J.BassettiB. (Eds.), Second language writing systems (pp. 1–67). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
14.
CrystalD. (1997). English as a global language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
CrystalD. (2003). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
16.
CumminsJ. (1981). The role of primary of language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In Schooling and language minority students (pp. 3–49). Sacramento: California Department of Education.
17.
CumminsJ. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
18.
CutlerA.ChenH.-C. (1997). Lexical tone in Cantonese spoken-word processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(2), 165–179.
19.
DeaconS. H.Wade-WoolleyL.KirbyJ. (2007). Crossover: The role of morphological awareness in French immersion children’s reading. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 732–746.
20.
DeFrancisJ. (1989). Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing system. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
21.
DoddB. J.SoL. K. H. (1994). The phonological abilities of Cantonese-speaking children with hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 671–679.
22.
DulayH.BurtM.KrashenT. (1982). Language two. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
DurgunogluA. Y. (2002a). Cross-linguistic transfer in literacy development and implications for language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 189–206.
24.
DurgunogluA. Y. (2002b). Recognizing morphologically complex words in Turkish. In AssinkE.SandraD. (Eds.), Reading complex words (pp. 81–92). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
25.
DurgunogluA. Y.HancinB. J. (1992). An overview of cross language transfer in bilingual reading. In HarrisR. J. (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 391–412). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North Holland.
26.
FrancisD. J.FletcherJ. M.StuebingK. K.LyonG. R.ShaywitzB. A.ShaywitzS. E. (2005). Psychometric approaches to the identification of LD: IQ and achievement scores are not sufficient. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(2), 98–108.
27.
FrostR. (2011). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioural Brain Science, 35(5), 263–279.
28.
GevaE. (2000). Issues in the assessment of reading disabilities in L2 children: Beliefs and research evidence. Dyslexia, 6, 13–28.
GottardoA.YanB.SiegelL. S.Wade-WoolleyL. (2001). Factors related to English reading performance in Chinese with Chinese as a first language: More evidence of cross-language transfer of phonological processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 530–542.
31.
HamadaM.KodaK. (2008). Influence of first language orthographic experience on second language decoding and word learning. Language Learning, 58, 1–31.
32.
HoC. S.-H.ChanD. W.-O.LeeS.-H.TsangS.-M.LuanV. H. (2004). Cognitive profiling and preliminary subtyping in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 91(1), 43–75. doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00163-x
33.
HoC. S.-H.ChanD. W.-O.TsangS.-M.LeeS.-H. (2000). The Hong Kong Test of Specific Learning Difficulties in Reading and Writing. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Specific Learning Difficulties Research Team.
34.
HollimanA. J.WoodC.SheehyK. (2010). Does speech rhythm sensitivity predict children’s reading ability 1 year later. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 356–366.
35.
Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department. (2006). 2006 population by-census. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government.
36.
KeungY.-C.HoC. S.-H. (2009). Transfer of reading-related cognitive skills in learning to read Chinese (L1) and English (L2) among Chinese elementary school children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 103–112.
37.
KodaK. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
38.
LeeK. Y.-S.ChiuS. N.HasseltC. A. (2002). Tone perception ability of Cantonese-speaking children. Language and Speech, 45(4), 387–406.
39.
LeeL.NusbaumH. C. (1993). Processing interactions between segmental and suprasegmental information in native speakers of English and Mandarin Chinese. Perception & Psychophysics, 53(2), 157–165.
40.
LeongC. K.ChengP. W.TanL. H. (2005). The role of sensitivity to rhymes, phonemes and tones in reading English and Chinese pseudowords. Reading and Writing, 18, 1–26.
41.
LeongC. K.HauK. T.ChengP. W.TanL. H. (2005). Exploring two-wave reciprocal structural relations among orthographic knowledge, phonological sensitivity, reading and spelling English words by Chinese students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(4), 591–600.
42.
LeongC. K.JoshiR. M. (1997). Relating phonologic and orthographic processing to learning to read and spell. In LeongC. K.JoshiR. M. (Eds.), Cross-language studies of learning to read and spell: Phonologic and orthographic processing (pp. 1–29). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
43.
Linguistic Society of Hong Kong. (2002). Hong Kong jyutping character table (2nd ed.). Hong Kong: Author.
44.
McBride-ChangC.ChenH.-C.KasisopaB.BurnhamD.ReillyR.LeppanenP. (2012). What and where is the word?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 33–34.
45.
McBride-ChangC.ChoJ.-R.LiuH.WagnerR. K.ShuH.ZhouA.MuseA. (2005). Changing models across cultures: Associations of phonological and morphological awareness to reading in Beijing, Hong Kong, Korea, and America. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 140–160.
46.
McBride-ChangC.HoC. S.-H. (2000). Naming speed and phonological awareness in Chinese children: Relations to reading skills. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 1, 93–108.
47.
McBride-ChangC.KailR. (2002). Cross-cultural similarities in the predictors of reading acquisition. Child Development, 73, 1392–1407.
48.
McBride-ChangC.LinD.LiuP. D.AramD.LevinI.ChoJ.-R.ZhangY. P. (2012). The ABC’s of Chinese: Maternal mediation of Pinyin for Chinese children’s early literacy skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 283–300.
49.
McBride-ChangC.LiuP. D.WongT.WongA.ShuH. (2011). Specific reading difficulties in Chinese, English, or both: Longitudinal markers of phonological awareness, morphological awareness, and RAN in Hong Kong Chinese children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(6), 503–514.
50.
McBride-ChangC.ShuH.ChanW.WongT.WongM.-Y.ZhangY.. . . ChanP. (2013). Poor readers of Chinese and English: Overlap, stability, and longitudinal correlates. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(1), 57–70.
51.
McBride-ChangC.TongX.ShuH.WongA. M.-Y.LeungK.TardifT. (2008). Syllable, phoneme, and tone: Psycholinguistic units in early Chinese and English word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 171–194.
52.
PasquarellaA.ChenX.LamK.LuoY. C.RamirezG. (2011). Cross-language transfer of morphological awareness in Chinese–English bilinguals. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(1), 23–42. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01484.x
53.
PerfettiC. A. (2003). The universal grammar of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 3–24.
54.
PerfettiC. A.CaoF.BoothJ. R. (2013). Specialization and universals in the development of reading skill: How Chinese research informs a universal science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(1), 5–21.
55.
ShareD. L. (2008). On the anglocentricities of current reading research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 584–615.
56.
SoC. K.BestC. T. (2010). Cross-language perception of non-native tonal contrasts: Effects of native phonological and phonetic influences. Language and Speech, 53(2), 273–293.
57.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
58.
TongX.McBride-ChangC. (2010). Developmental models of learning to read Chinese words. Developmental Psychology, 46(6), 1662–1676.
59.
WangM.PerfettiC. A.LiuY. (2005). Chinese–English biliteracy acquisition: Cross-language and writing system transfer. Cognition, 97(1), 67–88. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.001
60.
WolfM. (2007). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
61.
WongP. C. M.PerrachioneT.GunasekeraG.ChandrasekaranB. (2009). Communication disorders in speakers of tone languages: Etiological bases and clinical considerations. Seminars in Speech and Language, 30, 162–173.
62.
WongP. C. M.SkoeE.RussoN. M.DeesT.KrausN. (2007). Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 420–442.
63.
WoodC.TerrellC. (1998). Poor readers’ ability to detect rhythm and perceive rapid speech. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 397–413.
64.
YeY.ConnineC. M. (1999). Processing spoken Chinese: The role of tone information. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 609–630.
65.
ZieglerJ. C.GoswamiU. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29.
