BrykA. S.RaudenbushS. W. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. London, UK: Sage.
2.
CarlsonK. D.SchmidtF. L. (1999). Impact of experimental design on effect size: Findings from the research literature on training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 851–862.
3.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
4.
HadfA. R.WillamsM. A. (2009). Meta-analysis of correlations revisited: Attempted replication and extension of Field’s (2001) simulation studies. Psychological Methods, 14, 24–42.
5.
HewittD. J.HoT.GalerB.BackonjaM.MarkovitzP.GammaitoniA.. . . WangH. (2011). Impact of responder definition on the enriched enrollment randomized withdrawal trial design for establishing proof of concept in neuropathic pain. Pain, 152, 514–521.
6.
KimE. S.WillsonV. L. (2010). Evaluating pretest effects in pre-post studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 744–759.
7.
LightR. J.SingerJ. D.WilletJ. B. (1990). By design: Planning research on higher education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1209.
9.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
10.
RamseyJ. D.SpiritesP.GlymourC. (2011). On meta-analysis of imaging data and the mixture of records. Neuroimage, 57, 323–330.
11.
Sánchez-MecaJ.Marín-MartínezF.Chacó-MoscosoS. (2003). Effect-size indices for dichotomized outcomes in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 8, 448–467.
12.
ShadishW. R.RagsdaleK. (1996). Random versus nonrandom assignment in control experiments: Do you get the same answer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1290–1305.
13.
StuebingK.FletcherJ.HughesL. (2012). Meta-analysis and inadequate responders to intervention: A response. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 565–569.
14.
SwansonH. L. (1999). Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis in intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 504–532.
15.
SwansonH. L.LussierC. (2001). A selective synthesis of the experimental literature on dynamic assessment. Review of Educational Research, 71, 321–361.
16.
TranL.SanchezT.ArrelanoB.SwansonH. L. (2011). A meta-analysis of the RTI literature for children at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Leaning Disabilities, 44, 283–295.