The three current models of identifying learning disabilities: discrepancy model, RtI, and Componential Model of reading are discussed in terms of their utility.
AaronP. G. (1997). The impending demise of the discrepancy formula. Review of Educational Research, 67, 461–502.
2.
AaronP. G.JoshiR.M.Boulware-GoodenR.BentumK. (2008). Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the component model of reading: An alternative to the discrepancy model of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 67–84.
3.
AaronP. G.JoshiR. M.QuatrocheD. (2008). Becoming a professional reading teacher. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
4.
AaronP. G.JoshiM.WilliamsK. A. (1999). Not all reading disabilities are alike. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 120–137.
5.
BerkeleyS.BenderW. N.PeasterL. G.SaundersL. (2009). Implementation of response to intervention: A snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 85–95.
6.
CattsH. W.AdlofS. M.WeismerS. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 278–293.
7.
CharityA. H.ScarboroughH. S.GriffinD. M. (2004). Familiarity with school English in African-American children in its relation to early reading achievement. Child Development, 75, 1340–1356.
8.
ChiuM. M.McBride-ChangC. (2006). Gender, context, and reading: A comparison of students in 43 countries. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 331–362.
9.
FletcherJ. M.DentonC.FrancisD. J. (2005). Validity of alternative approaches for the identification of learning disabilities: Operationalizing unexpected underachievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 545–552.
10.
FrancisD. J.FletcherJ. M.StuebingG.LyonG. R.ShaywitzB. A.ShaywitzS. E. (2005). Psychometric approaches to the identification of LD: IQ and achievement scores are not sufficient. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 98–108.
11.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2006). A framework for building capacity for responsiveness to intervention. School Psychology Review, 35, 621–626.
12.
GoughP.TunmerW. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
13.
HinshelwoodJ. (1895). Word-blindness and visual memory. Lancet, 21, 1564–1570.
14.
HooverW.GoughP. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160.
15.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004).
16.
JohnstonT. C.KirbyJ. R. (2006). The contribution of naming speed to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 19, 339–361.
17.
JoshiR. M.AaronP. G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85–97.
18.
JoshiR. M.AaronP. G. (2008). Assessment of literacy problems based on the component model of reading. In ReidG.FawcettA.ManisF.SiegelL. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of dyslexia (pp. 268–289). London, UK: SAGE.
19.
JoshiR. M.AaronP. G. (2011). Assessment of reading problems among ELLs based on the component model. In DurgunogluA.GoldenbergC. (Eds.), Language and literacy development in bilingual settings (pp. 304–331). New York, NY: Guilford.
20.
KirkS. A. (1962). Educating exceptional children. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
21.
MorganW. P. (1896). A case of congenital word blindness. British Medical Journal, 2, 1368.
22.
PiastaS. B.ConnorC. M.FishmanB. J.MorrisonF. J. (2009). Teachers’ knowledge of literacy concepts, classroom practices, and student reading growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 224–248.
23.
SavageR. (2006). Reading comprehension is not always the product of nonsense-word decoding and listening comprehension: Evidence from teenagers who are extremely poor readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 143–164.
24.
TranL.SanchezT.ArellanoB.SwansonH. L. (2011). A meta-analysis of the RTI literature for children at risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44, 283–295.
25.
WagnerR. (2008). Rediscovering dyslexia: New approaches for identification and classification. In ReidG.FawcettA. J.ManisF.SiegelL. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of dyslexia (pp. 174–191). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
