This study examined reading performance of 102 Chinese Mandarin-speaking 4th graders in their second language (L2, English) as a function of performance in their first language (L1, Chinese). The results revealed that for Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and Rapid Alternating Stimulus (RAS) measures, the mean naming time decreased monotonically in high-achieving, average, and low-achieving readers. RAN and RAS differentiated poor readers from good and average readers but failed to differentiate between good and average readers. RAN deficits occurred in poor readers in both languages. Comparison of memory profiles revealed that patterns varied depending on the mode of stimulus presentation or response. Low-achieving readers performed poorly on a subtest involving visual components only and did relatively better on a subtest involving verbal components only. Poor readers in Chinese also encountered difficulties in learning English as a L2. RAN-character accounted for unique variance in two Chinese reading measures. RAN-letter explained unique variance in English mid-term reading grade. The unique variance captured by the Color Span Subtest 1 (visual-visual) was found in Chinese reading comprehension but not in English reading comprehension. Reading performance in L1 was predictive of reading performance in L2 and vice versa.
AmtmannD.AbbottR. D.BerningerV. W. (2007). Mixture growth models of RAN and RAS row by row: Insight into the reading system at work over time. Reading and Writing, 20, 785–813.
2.
BialystokE.McBride-ChangC.LukG. (2005). Bilingualism, language proficiency, and learning to read in two writing systems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 580–590.
3.
BlachmanB. A. (1984). Relationship of rapid naming ability and language analysis skills to kindergarten and first-grade reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 610–622.
4.
BowersP. G. (1989). Naming speed and phonological awareness: Independent contributors to reading disabilities. In McCormickS.ZutellJ. (Eds.), Cognitive and social perspectives for literacy research and instruction: 38th yearbook of the national reading conference (pp. 165-172). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference, Inc.
5.
BowersP. G. (1995). Tracing symbol naming speed’s unique contributions to reading disability over time. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 189–216.
6.
BowersP. G.GoldenJ.KennedyA.YoungA. (1994). Limits upon orthographic knowledge due to processes indexed by naming speed. In BerningerV. W. (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 173–218). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
7.
BowersP. G.Newby-ClarkeE. (2002). The role of naming speed within a model of reading acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 109–126.
8.
BowersP. G.SteffiR. A.TateE. (1988). Comparison of the effects of IQ control methods on memory and naming speed predictors of reading disability. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 304–319.
9.
BowersP. G.WolfM. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 69–85.
10.
BoweyJ. A.McGuiganM.RuschenaA. (2005). On the association between serial naming speed for letters and digits and word-reading skill: Towards a developmental account. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 400–422.
11.
ChenM. J. (2003). Component skills for reading Chinese in primary school children. In McBride-ChangC.ChenH.-C. (Eds.), Reading development in Chinese children (pp. 19–33). Westport, CT: Praeger.
12.
ChowB., W.-Y.McBride-ChangC.BurgessS. (2005). Phonological processing skills and early reading abilities in Hong Kong Chinese kindergarteners learning to read English as a second language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(1), 81–87.
13.
ClarkeP.HulmeC.SnowlingM. J. (2005). Individual differences in RAN and reading: A response timing analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 73–86.
14.
ComptonD. L. (2003). Modeling the relationship between growth in rapid naming speed and growth in decoding skill in first-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 225–239.
15.
CoulmasF. (1989). The writing systems of the world. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
16.
de JongP. F.van der LeijA. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450–476.
17.
DencklaM. B. (1972). Color-naming in dyslexic boys. Cortex, 8, 164–176.
18.
DencklaM. B. (1999). History and significance of rapid automatized naming. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 29–42.
19.
DencklaM. B.RudelR. G. (1976). Rapid “automatized” naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479.
20.
DingY.RichmanL. C.YangL.-Y.GuoJ.-P. (2010). Rapid automatized naming skills and immediate memory functions in Chinese Mandarin speaking elementary readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(1), 48–61.
21.
EhriL. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In GoughP. G.EhriL. C.TreimanR. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
FletcherJ. M.SatzP. (1979). Has Vellutino led us astray? A rejoinder to a reply. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 168–171.
23.
GevaE.SiegelL. S. (2000). Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in two languages. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 1–30.
24.
GholamainM.GevaE. (1999). Orthographic and cognitive factors in the concurrent development of basic reading skills in English and Persian. Language Learning, 49, 183–217.
25.
GottardoA.YanB.SiegelL. S.Wade-WoolleyL. (2001). Factors related to English reading performance in children with Chinese as a first language: More evidence of cross-language transfer of phonological processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 530–542.
26.
GunterT.WagnerS.FriedericiA. (2003). Working memory and lexical ambiguity resolution as revealed by ERPS: A difficult case for activation theories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 643–657.
27.
HoC. S.BryantP. (1997). Development of phonological awareness of Chinese children in Hong Kong. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(1), 109–126.
28.
HoosainR. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
HuR. (2009). English reading instruction in elementary schools in China. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 9(2), 150–165.
30.
HuangH. S.HanleyJ. R. (1997). A longitudinal study of phonological awareness, visual skills, and Chinese reading acquisition among first-graders in Taiwan. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20(2), 249–268.
31.
JohnsonD. J.MyklebustH. R. (1967). Learning disabilities. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
32.
JohnstonT. C.KirbyJ. R. (2006). The contribution of naming speed to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 19, 339–361.
33.
JuD.JacksonN. E. (1995). Graphic and phonological processing in Chinese character identification. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 299–313.
34.
KatzirT.KimY.WolfM.O’BrienB. K.LovettM.MorrisR. (2006). Reading fluency: The whole is more than the parts. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 51–82.
35.
KobayashiM. S.HaynesC. W.MacarusoP.HookP. E.KatoJ. (2005). Effects of mora deletion, nonword repetition, rapid naming, and visual search performance on beginning reading in Japanese. Annals of Dyslexia, 55(1), 105–128.
36.
LiaoC.-H.GeorgiouG. K.ParrilaR. (2008). Rapid naming speed and Chinese character recognition. Reading and Writing, 21, 231–253.
37.
LindgrenS. D.RichmanL. C. (1984). Immediate memory functions of verbally deficient reading disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 222–225.
38.
LindgrenS. D.RichmanL. C.EliasonM. J. (1986). Memory processes in reading disability subtypes. Developmental Neuropsychology, 2(3), 173–181.
39.
ManisF. R.DoiL. M.BhadhaB. (2000). Naming speed, phonological awareness, and orthographic knowledge in second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 325–333.
40.
ManisF. R.SeidenbergM. S.DoiL. M. (1999). See Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the longitudinal prediction of reading subskills in first and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 129–157.
41.
MannV.WimmerH. (2002). Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 653–682.
42.
MattisS. (1978). Dyslexia symptoms: A working hypothesis that works. In BentonA. L.PearlD. (Eds.), Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge (pp. 43–58). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43.
McBride-ChangC.ManisF. R. (1996). Structural invariance in the associations of naming speed, phonological awareness, and verbal reasoning in good and poor readers: A test of the double deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 323–339.
44.
MeyerM. S.WoodF. B.HartL.FeltonR. H. (1998). Selective predictive value of rapid automatized naming within poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 106–117.
45.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN.EmersonM.WitzkiA.HowerterA.WagerT. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.
46.
PatelT.SnowlingM. J.de JongP. F. (2004). A cross-linguistic comparison of children learning to read in English and Dutch. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 785–797.
47.
PerfettiC. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In GoughP. B.EhriL. C.TreimanR. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
RichmanL. C.LindgrenS. D. (1978). The Color Span Test. Iowa City, IA: Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa.
50.
RourkeB. P.YoungG. C.FlewellingR. W. (1971). The relationships between WISC verbal-performance discrepancies and selected verbal, auditory-perceptual, visual-perceptual, and problem-solving abilities in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 475–479.
51.
SatzP.MorrisR. (1981). Learning disabilities subtypes: A review. In PirozzoloF. J.WittrockM. C. (Eds.), Neuropsychological and cognitive processes in reading (pp. 109–141). New York, NY: Academic Press.
52.
SavageR. (2004). Motor skills, automaticity and developmental dyslexia: A review of the research literature. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 301–324.
53.
SavageR.FredericksonN. (2005). Evidence of a highly specific relationship between rapid automatic naming of digits and text-reading speed. Brain and Language, 93, 152–159.
54.
ScarboroughH. S. (1998). Predicting the future achievement of second graders with reading disabilities: Contributions of phonemic awareness, verbal memory, rapid naming, and IQ. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 115–136.
55.
SenfG. M.FreundlR. C. (1972). Sequential auditory and visual memory in learning disabled children. Proceedings of the 80th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 7, 511–512.
56.
ShenH. H.BearD. R. (2000). Development of orthographic skills in Chinese children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13, 197–236.
57.
ShuH.AndersonR. C. (1997). Role of radical awareness in the character and word acquisition of Chinese children. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 78–89.
58.
StanovichK. E. (1981). Relationships between word decoding speed, general name-retrieval ability, and reading progress in first-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 809–815.
59.
TorgesenJ. K. (1977). Memorization processes in reading-disabled children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 571–578.
60.
TorgesenJ. K. (1982). The study of short-term memory in learning disabled children: Goals, methods, and conclusions. In GadowK.BialerI. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (pp. 117–149). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
61.
Van der MeereJ.Van BaalM.SergeantJ. (1989). The additive factor method: A differential diagnostic tool in hyperactivity and learning disability. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17, 409–422.
62.
VellutinoF. R. (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63.
VellutinoF. R.ScanlonD. M.SipayE. R.SmallS. G.PrattA.ChenR.DencklaM. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638.
64.
VukovicR. K.SiegelL. S. (2006). The double-deficit hypothesis: A comprehensive analysis of the evidence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(1), 25–47.
65.
Wade-WoolleyL.GevaE. (2000). Processing novel phonemic contrasts in the acquisition of L2 word reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 295–311.
66.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.LaughonP.SimmonsK.RashotteC. A. (1993). Development of young readers’ phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(5), 83–103.
67.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87.
68.
WagnerR.TorgesenJ.RashotteC. A.HechtS.BarkerT.BurgessT.. . .GaronT. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468–479.
69.
WiederholtJ. L.BryantB. R. (2001). Gray Oral Reading Test-fourth edition (GORT-4). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education Inc.
70.
WiggE. H.ZureichP.ChanH.-N. (2000). A clinical rationale for assessing rapid automatized naming in children with language disorders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 359–374.
71.
WolfM. (1986). Rapid alternating stimulus naming in the developmental dyslexias. Brain and Language, 27(2), 360–379.
72.
WolfM.BallyH.MorrisR. (1986). Automaticity, retrieval processes, and reading: A longitudinal study in average and impaired readers. Child Development, 57, 988–1000.
73.
WolfM.BowersP. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415–438.
74.
WolfM.BowersP. G.BiddleK. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407.
75.
WolfM.DencklaM. B. (2005). RAN/RAS: Rapid automatized naming and rapid alternating stimulus tests. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed Inc.
76.
WoodK. M.RichmanL. C.EliasonM. J. (1989). Immediate memory functions in reading disability subtypes. Brain and Language, 36, 181–192.
77.
YoungA.BowersP. G. (1995). Individual differences and text difficulty determinants of reading fluency and expressiveness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 428–454.
