Much has been written about gifted students with learning disabilities, but there have been few large-scale empirical investigations, and the concept has proven controversial. The authors reviewed the available empirical literature on these students, focusing on (a) the criteria by which the students were identified and (b) the students’ performance on standardized tests of ability and achievement. In addition, the test scores of these students were aggregated to determine typical performance levels. A total of 46 empirical articles were reviewed, and major findings included wide variability in identification criteria across studies, frequent reliance on dubious methods of learning disability identification, and a lack of academic impairment among the identified students. Implications for the “gifted/LD” category are discussed.
*Al-HroubA.WhitebreadD. (2008). Teacher nomination of “mathematically gifted children with specific learning difficulties” at three state schools in Jordan. British Journal of Special Education, 35, 152–164.
*AssoulineS.NicponM.WhitemanC. (2010). Cognitive and psychosocial characteristics of gifted students with written language disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54, 102–115.
4.
*BartonJ.StarnesW. (1988). Identifying distinguishing characteristics of gifted and talented/learning disabled students. Roeper Review, 12, 23–28.
5.
*BaumS.OwenS. (1988). High ability/learning disabled students: How are they different?Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 321–326.
6.
BaumS. M.OwenS. V. (2004). To be gifted and learning disabled: Strategies for helping bright students with learning and attention problems. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
7.
BrueggemannA. E.KamphausR. W.DombrowskiS. C. (2008). An impairment model of learning disability diagnosis. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39, 424–430.
8.
*ChermakG.BurgerudD. (1983). Receptive language of gifted and learning disabled children. Exceptional Child, 30, 226–229.
9.
CohenS. S.VaughnS. (1994). Gifted students with learning disabilities: What does the research say?Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 5, 87–94.
10.
ColemanL. J.CrossT. L. (2005). Being gifted in school: An introduction to development, guidance, and teaching (2nd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
11.
*ColemanM. (1992). A comparison of how gifted/LD and average/LD boys cope with school frustration. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 239–265.
12.
*ColemanM. (2001). Surviving or thriving?Gifted Child Today, 24, 56–63.
13.
*CooperJ. (1998). An exploratory study of the metacognition of verbally gifted/learning disabled learners with and without reading disabilities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
14.
*CrawfordS.SnartF. (1994). Process-based remediation of decoding in gifted LD students: Three case studies. Roeper Review, 16, 247–252.
15.
*DoleS. (2001). Reconciling contradictions: Identity formation in individuals with giftedness and learning disabilities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25, 103–137.
16.
DombrowskiS. C.KamphausR. W.ReynoldsC. R. (2004). After the demise of the discrepancy: Proposed learning disabilities diagnostic criteria. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 364–372.
17.
*FaouriF. (1998). The impact of learning disabilities and giftedness on the self-esteem of students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin, Madison.
18.
*FerriB.GreggN.HeggoyS. (1997). Profiles of college students demonstrating learning disabilities with and without giftedness. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 552–559.
19.
FoxL. H.BrodyL.TobinD. (Eds.). (1983). Learning-disabled/gifted children: Identification and programming. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
20.
*GanschowL. (1985). Diagnosing and remediating writing problems of gifted students with language learning disabilities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 9, 25–43.
21.
*GinsburghP. (2008). An exploratory study of the academic journey of successful twice exceptional students at a selective institution of higher learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.
22.
GreshamF. M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: From research to practice (pp. 467–519). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
*HannahC.ShoreB. (2008). Twice-exceptional students’ use of metacognitive skills on a comprehension monitoring task. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 3–18.
24.
*HayesP.NorrisJ.FlaitzJ. (1998). Evidence of language problems in underachieving gifted adolescents: Implications for assessment. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9, 179–194.
25.
*HollidayG.KollerJ.ThomasC. (1999). Post–high school outcomes of high IQ adults with learning disabilities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 266–281.
26.
*HryekewiczB. (1992). Identifying gifted learning-disabled children with the Learning Disability Index (LDI) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas Woman’s University, Denton.
27.
*HuaC. (2002). Career self-efficacy of the student who is gifted/learning disabled: A case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25, 375–404.
28.
*KaminskyH. (2007). The effects of an enrichment program on the academic self-perceptions of male and female culturally diverse minority gifted learning disabled students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Fairleigh Dickinson University, Madison, NJ.
29.
*KauderJ. (2010). The impact of twice-exceptionality on self-perceptions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Iowa, Iowa City.
30.
KavaleK. A. (2002). Discrepancy models in the identification of learning disability. In BradleyR.DanielsonL.HallahanD. P. (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 369–426). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
KavaleK. A.HoldnackJ. A.MostertM. P. (2005). Responsiveness to intervention and the identification of specific learning disability: A critique and alternative proposal. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 2–16.
32.
KavaleK. A.SpauldingL. S. (2008). Is response to intervention good policy for specific learning disability?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 169–179.
33.
KrochakL. A.RyanT. G. (2007). The challenge of identifying gifted/learning disabled students. International Journal of Special Education, 22(3), 44–54.
34.
LovettB. J.LewandowskiL. J. (2006). Gifted students with learning disabilities: Who are they?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 515–527.
35.
LovettB.SparksR. (2010). Exploring the diagnosis of “gifted/LD”: Characterizing post-secondary students with learning disability diagnoses at different IQ levels. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 91–101.
36.
*MannJ. (1992). Locus-of-control in gifted children with learning disabilities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, College Station.
37.
McCoachD. B.KehleT.BrayM. A.SiegleD. (2001). Best practices in the identification of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 403–411.
38.
*McGuireK.YewchukC. (1996). Use of metacognitive reading strategies by gifted learning disabled students: An exploratory study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 293–314.
39.
*McIntoshD.DunhamM.DeanR.KundertD. (1995). Neuropsychological characteristics of learning disabled/gifted children. International Journal of Neuroscience, 83, 123–130.
40.
MeisgeierC.MeisgeierC.WerboloD. (1978). Factors compounding the handicapping of some gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22, 325–331.
41.
MintonB. A.PrattS. (2006). Gifted and highly gifted students: How do they score on the SB5?Roeper Review, 28, 232–236.
42.
*MontagueM. (1991). Gifted and learning-disabled gifted students’ knowledge and use of mathematical problem-solving strategies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 393–411.
43.
*MontgomeryJ. (2007). Characteristics and development of male adolescent students who are gifted, gifted twice-exceptional, or attention deficit: A mixed-methods study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Idaho, Moscow.
44.
*NielsenM. E. (2002). Gifted students with learning disabilities: Recommendations for identification and programming. Exceptionality, 10, 93–111.
45.
*NielsenM.Mortorff-AlbertS. (1989). The effects of special education service on the self-concept and school attitude of learning disabled/gifted students. Roeper Review, 12, 29–36.
46.
*OlenchakF. (1995). Effects of enrichment on gifted/learning-disabled students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 385–399.
47.
*PalmquistE. (1993). Scatter analysis of WISC-R profiles for gifted/learning disabled children (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). U.S. International University, Nairobi, Kenya.
48.
*PoppeR. (1994). A study of the WISC-R scores of Hispanic and non-Hispanic gifted/learning disabled students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
49.
ProctorB.PrevattF. (2003). Agreement among four models used for diagnosing learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 459–466.
50.
*RademacherJ. (1992). WISC-R profile comparisons and analyses of learning-disabled, gifted, learning-disabled gifted, and average ability students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Northern Colorado, Greeley.
51.
*RaneyJ. (1993). Outcomes of direct instruction and cluster setting on achievement and self-concept of elementary students identified as gifted/learning disabled (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
52.
*RattnerB. (1983). A comparison of WISC-R subtest patterns among gifted children with learning disabilities, gifted children, and average IQ children with learning disabilities (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
53.
*ReisS.ColbertR. (2004). Counseling needs of academically talented students with learning disabilities. Professional School Counseling, 8, 156–167.
54.
*ReisS.McGuireJ.NeuT. (2000). Compensation strategies used by high-ability students with learning disabilities who succeed in college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 123–134.
55.
ReschlyD. J.HospJ. L. (2004). State SLD identification policies and practices. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 197–213.
56.
ReynoldsC. R.ShaywitzS. E. (2009). Response to intervention: Ready or not? Or, from wait-to-fail to watch-them-fail. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 130–145.
57.
RichertE. S. (2003). Excellence with justice in identification and programming. In ColangeloN. A.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 146–158). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
58.
RourkeB. P. (2005). Neuropsychology of learning disabilities: Past and future. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 111–114.
59.
RufD. L. (2003). Use of the SB5 in the assessment of high abilities (Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, 5th ed., Assessment Service Bulletin No. 3). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
60.
*SahA.BorlandJ. (1989). The effects of a structured home placement plan on the home and school behaviors of gifted learning-disabled students with deficits in organizational skills. Roeper Review, 12, 54–57.
61.
*SchiffM.KaufmanA.KaufmanN. (1981). Scatter analysis of WISC-R profiles for learning disabled children with superior intelligence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 400–404.
62.
*SimmonsV. (1984). A comparison of self-concept and creativity scores for gifted and gifted-learning disabled students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kent State University, Kent, OH.
63.
SparksR. S.LovettB. J. (2009). Objective criteria for classification of postsecondary students as learning disabled: Effects on prevalence rates and group characteristics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 230–239.
64.
StanovichK. E. (1994). Annotation: Does dyslexia exist?Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 35, 579–595.
65.
StanovichK. E. (1999). The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 350–361.
66.
SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
67.
SternbergR. J.GrigorenkoE. L. (2002). Difference scores in the identification of children with learning disabilities: It’s time to use a different method. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 65–83.
68.
*SuterD.WolfJ. (1987). Issues in the identification and programming of the gifted/learning disabled child. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 227–237.
69.
ThompsonL. (1971). Language disabilities in men of eminence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 4, 34–45.
70.
*Toomey-LynchM. (2006). The effects of an enrichment program on gifted learning-disabled students’ academic self-perceptions: An empirical study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Fairleigh Dickinson University, Madison, NJ.
71.
VaughnS. (1989). Gifted learning disabilities: Is it such a bright idea?Learning Disabilities Focus, 4, 123–128.
72.
*VespiL.YewchukC. (1992). A phenomenological study of the social/emotional characteristics of gifted learning disabled children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 55–72.
73.
WaldronK.SaphireD. (1990). An analysis of WISC-R factors for gifted students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 491–498.
74.
WeinfeldR.Barnes-RobinsonL.JewelerS.ShevitzB. R. (2006). Smart kids with learning difficulties: Overcoming obstacles and realizing potential. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
75.
WhitmoreJ. R.MakerC. J. (1985). Intellectual giftedness in disabled persons. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.
76.
*WilkinsonS. (1999). Influences on the academic performance of twice-exceptional high school students: An exploratory study of risk, resilience, and achievement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
77.
*YsselH. (1993). A comparative study of the anxiety levels of gifted, learning-disabled gifted and learning-disabled college students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
