Altogether 1,285 Finnish children were followed up from the end of kindergarten through Grade 1. All were nonreaders at school entrance. The aim was to delineate predictors of resistance to treatment that are evidenced as little or no reading progress during Grade 1. On the basis of reading achievement in Grade 1 spring, four subgroups were formed. These were fast, average, and slow reading acquisition and slow progress in both reading and math. Kindergarten spring scores in phonological awareness, letter knowledge, rapid naming, and number skills differentiated well among the groups, the latter two being more robust predictors. Task avoidance added to the prediction over and above cognitive skills. Its effect disappeared when parental history of reading and math difficulties was included in the equation. The present results depict poor response to instruction as a general learning problem rather than a specific reading difficulty. Poor response to instruction differs from dyslexia also in that treatment resisters start school with cognitive prerequisites that do not indicate severe reading and math problems.
BishopD. (1997). Uncommon understanding: Development and disorders of language comprehension in children. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
7.
BlachmanB. (1997). Early intervention and phonological awareness: A cautionary tale. In BlachmanB. (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 409–430). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
BullR.EspyK.WiebeS. (2008). Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement at age 7 years. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 205–228.
9.
BusA.van IJzendoornM. (1999). Phonological awareness and early reading: A meta-analysis of experimental training studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 403–414.
10.
de JongP.van der LeijA. (2003). Developmental changes in the manifestation of phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 22–40.
11.
de JongP.VrielinkL. (2004). Rapid automatic naming: Easy to measure, hard to improve (quickly). Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 65–88.
12.
DencklaM.RudelR. (1976). Rapid “automatized” naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities. Neuropsychologia, 14, 471–479.
13.
EhriL.NunesD.WillowsD.SchusterB.Yaghoub-ZadehZ.ShanahanT. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 250–287.
14.
ElleyW. (1994). The IEA study of reading literacy: Achievement and instruction in thirty-two school systems. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
15.
FuchsD.FuchsL. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it?Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 92–99.
16.
GeorgiouG.ManolitsisG.NurmiJ.-E.ParrilaR. (2010). Does task-focus versus task-avoidance behavior matter for literacy development in an orthographically consistent language?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 1–10.
17.
GrimmK. (2008). Longitudinal associations between reading and mathematics achievement. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 410–426.
18.
HatcherP.HulmeC.EllisA. (1994). Ameliorating early reading failure by integrating the teaching and phonological skills—The phonological linkage hypothesis. Child Development, 65, 41–57.
19.
JuelC. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447.
20.
KatzirT.Young-SukK.WolfM.MorrisR.LovettM. (2008). The varieties of pathways to dysfluent reading. Comparing subtypes of children with dyslexia at letter, word, and connected text levels of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 47–66.
21.
KirbyJ.ParrilaR.PfeifferS. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453–464.
22.
KirschI.de JongJ.LafontaineD.McQueenJ.MendelovitsJ.MonseurC. (2002). Reading for change: Performance and engagement across countries. Results from PISA 2000. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
23.
KjeldsenA.-C.NiemiP.OlofssonÅ. (2003). Training phonological awareness in kindergarten level children: Consistency is more important than quantity. Learning and Instruction, 13, 349–365.
24.
KoponenT.AunolaK.AhonenT.NurmiJ.-E. (2007). Cognitive predictors of single-digit and procedural calculation skills and their covariation with reading skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 220–241.
25.
LanderlK.WimmerH. (2008). Development of word reading fluency in a consistent orthography: A 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150–161.
26.
LepolaJ.NiemiP.KuikkaM.HannulaM. (2005). Cognitive-linguistic skills and motivation as longitudinal predictors of reading and arithmetic skills: A follow-up study from kindergarten to Grade 2. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 250–271.
27.
LepolaJ.PoskipartaE.LaakkonenE.NiemiP. (2005). Development of and relationship between phonological and motivational processes and naming speed in predicting word recognition in Grade 1. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 367–399.
28.
LepolaJ.SalonenP.VaurasM. (2000). The development of motivational orientations as a function of divergent reading careers from pre-school to the second grade. Learning and Instruction, 10, 153–177.
29.
LeppänenU.NiemiP.AunolaK.NurmiJ.-E. (2004). Development of reading skills among preschool and primary school pupils. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 72–93.
30.
LerkkanenM.-K.PoikkeusA.-M.KetonenR. (2006). ARMI * Luku- ja kirjoitustaidon arviointimateriaali 1. luokalle [ARMI * A tool for assessing reading and writing skills in Grade 1]. Helsinki, Finland: WSOY.
31.
LindemanJ. (2000). Ala-asteen lukutesti (ALLU) [Standardized reading test for comprehensive school]. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Turku, Centre for Learning Research.
32.
LundbergI. (1994). Reading difficulties can be predicted and prevented: A Scandinavian perspective on phonological awareness and reading. In HulmeC.SnowlingM. (Eds.), Reading development and dyslexia (pp. 180–199). London, UK: Whurr.
33.
LundbergI.FrostJ.PetersenO.-P. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263–284.
34.
LyytinenH.AroM.EklundK.ErskineJ.GuttormT.LaaksoM.-L.TorppaM. (2004). The development of children at familial risk for dyslexia: Birth to early school age. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 184–220.
35.
LyytinenH.ErskineJ.AhonenT.AroM.EklundK.GuttormT.ViholainenH. (2008). Early identification and prevention of dyslexia: Results from a prospective follow-up study of children at familial risk for dyslexia. In ManisF.ReidG.SiegelL. (Eds.), Handbook of dyslexia (pp. 121–146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
MorganP.FuchsD. (2007). Is there a bi-directional relationship between children’s reading skills and reading motivation?Exceptional Children, 73, 165–183.
37.
MorganP.FarkasG.HibelJ. (2008). Matthew effects for whom?Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 31, 187–198.
38.
MorganP.FuchsD.ComptonD.CordrayD.FuchsL. (2008). Does early reading failure decrease children’s reading motivation?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 387–404.
Onatsu-ArvilommiT.NurmiJ.-E. (2000). The role of task-avoidant and task-focused behaviours in the development of reading and mathematical skills during the first school year: A cross-lagged longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 472–491.
41.
PhillipsL.NorrisS.OsmondW.MaynardA. (2002). Relative reading achievement: A longitudinal study of 187 children from first through sixth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 3–13.
42.
PiastaS.WagnerR. K. (2010). Developing early literacy skills: A meta-analysis of alphabet learning and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 8–38.
43.
PoskipartaE.NiemiP.LepolaJ.AhtolaA.LaineP. (2003). Motivational-emotional vulnerability and difficulties in learning to read and spell. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 187–206.
44.
PoskipartaE.NiemiP.VaurasM. (1999). Who benefits from training in linguistic awareness in the first grade, and what components show training effects?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 437–446.
45.
PuolakanahoA.PoikkeusA.-M.AhonenT.TolvanenA.LyytinenH. (2004). Emerging phonological awareness as a precursor of risk in children with and without familial risk for dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 221–243.
46.
QuirkM.SchwanenflugelP.WebbM.-Y. (2009). A short-term longitudinal study of the relationship between motivation to read and reading fluency skill in second grade. Journal of Literacy Research, 41, 196–227.
47.
RothE.SchneiderW. (2002). Long-term effects of training phonological awareness and letter-knowledge on literacy acquisition. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 16, 99–107.
48.
SamuelssonS.ByrneB.OlsonR.HulslanderJ.WadsworthS.CorleyR.DeFriesJ. (2008). Response to early literacy instruction in the United States, Australia, and Scandinavia: A behavioral-genetic analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 289–295.
49.
ScarboroughH. (1990). Very early language deficits in dyslexic children. Child Development, 61, 1728–1734.
50.
ScarboroughH. (2002). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In NeumanS.DickinsonD. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). New York, NY: Guilford.
51.
SchatschneiderC.CarlsonC.FrancisD.FoormanB.FletcherJ. (2002). Relationship of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development: Implications for the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 245–256.
52.
SchneiderW.RothE.EnnemoserM. (2000). Training phonological skills and letter knowledge in children at risk for dyslexia: A comparison of three kindergarten intervention programs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 284–295.
53.
SideridisG.AntoniouF.PadeliaduS. (2008). Teacher bias in the identification of learning disabilities: An application of the logistic multilevel model. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 199–209.
54.
SideridisG.MorganP.BotsasG.PadeliaduS.FuchsD. (2006). Predicting LD on the basis of motivation, metacognition, and psychopathology: An ROC analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 215–229.
55.
SimmonsF.SingletonC. (2007). Do weak phonological representations impact on arithmetic development? A review of research into arithmetic and dyslexia. Dyslexia, 14, 77–94.
56.
SnowC.BurnsM.GriffinP. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
57.
SnowlingM.MuterV.CarrollJ. (2007). Children at family risk of dyslexia: A follow-up in early adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 609–618.
58.
StanovichK. (1988). Explaining the difference between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–612.
59.
StephensonK.ParrilaR.GeorgiouG.KirbyJ. (2008). Effects of home literacy, parents’ beliefs, and children’s task-focused behavior on emergent literacy and word reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 24–50.
60.
TorgesenJ. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55–64.
61.
TorppaM.PoikkeusA.-M.LaaksoM.-L.TolvanenA.LeskinenE.LeppänenP.LyytinenH. (2007). Modeling the early paths of phonological awareness and factors supporting its development in children with and without familial risk of dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 73–102.
62.
VellutinoF.ScanlonD.SipayE.SmallS.PrattA.ChenR.DencklaM. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638.
63.
VellutinoF.ScanlonD.ZhangH.SchatschneiderC. (2008). Using response to kindergarten and first grade intervention to identify children at-risk for long-term reading difficulties. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 437–480.
64.
VukovicR.SiegelL. (2006). The double-deficit hypothesis: A comprehensive analysis of the evidence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 25–47.
65.
WolfM.BowersP. (1999). The “double-deficit” hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1–24.
66.
WolfM.BowersP.BiddleK. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407.
