The Impact of the Flynn Effect on LD Diagnoses in Special Education

Abstract

Because of the Flynn effect, IQ scores rise as a test norm ages but drop on the introduction of a newly revised test norm. The purpose of the current study was to determine the impact of the Flynn effect on learning disability (LD) diagnoses, the most prevalent special education diagnosis in the United States. Using a longitudinal sample of 875 school children who were initially diagnosed with LD on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Revised (WISC-R), children experienced a significant decline in IQ when retested on the third edition of the WISC (WISC-III) compared to peers who were tested on the WISC-R twice. Furthermore, results from logistic regression analyses revealed that the probability of a rediagnosis of LD on reevaluation significantly decreased, in part, because of this decline on the WISC-III. These results are discussed in terms of their implications for both basic research and educational policy.

Keywords

diagnosis Flynn effect IQ special education longitudinal study WISC

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association of Mental Retardation. (2002). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (10th ed.). Annapolis, MD: Author.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistic manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Bradley

Danielson

Hallahan

D. P.

(Eds.). (2002). Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Chambers

J. G.

Perez

Socias

Shkolnik

Esra

Brown

S. C.

(2004). Education students with disabilities: Comparing methods for explaining expenditure variation. Palo Alto, CA: American Institutes for Research.

Code of Federal Regulations, Title 34, (§) 300.8 (c).

Danforth

(2009). Third defendant ruled incompetent for cabbie murder trial. Alexandria Times. Retrieved from http://www.alextimes.com/news/2009/sep/10/third-defendant-ruled-incompetent-for-ca/

Data Accountability Center. (2007). Data tables for OSEP state reported data. Retrieved from https://www.ideadata.org/arc_toc9.asp#partbCC

Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, Pub. L. No. 94-142 (1975).

Fitzgerald

Gray

Snowden

(2007). A comparison of WAIS-R and WAIS-III in lower IQ range: Implications for learning disability diagnosis. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 20, 323–330. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2006.00349.x10.1111/j.1468-3148.2006.00349.x

10.

Fletcher

J. M.

Denton

Francis

D. J.

(2005). Validity of alternative approaches for the identification of learning disabilities: Operationalizing unexpected underachievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 545–552. doi:10.1177/0022219405038006110110.1177/00222194050380061101

11.

Fletcher

J. M.

Vaughn

(2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 30–37. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x

12.

Flynn

J. R.

(1984). IQ gains and the Binet decrements. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 283–290. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb01035.x10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb01035.x

13.

Flynn

J. R.

(1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 171–191. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.17110.1037/0033-2909.101.2.171

14.

Flynn

J. R.

(2007). What is intelligence? New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Fuchs

Mock

Morgan

P. L.

Young

C. L.

(2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157–171. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.0007210.1111/1540-5826.00072

16.

Gajria

Jitendra

A. K.

Sood

Sacks

(2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 210–225. doi:10.1177/0022219407040003030110.1177/00222194070400030301

17.

Gaskill

F. W.

III Brantley

J. C.

(1996). Changes in ability and achievement scores over time: Implications for children classified as learning disabled. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 14, 220–228.

18.

Kanaya

Ceci

S. J.

(2007). Are all IQ scores created equal? The differential costs of IQ cut-off scores for at-risk children. Child Development Perspectives, 1, 52–56. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00010.x10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00010.x

19.

Kanaya

Ceci

S. J.

(in press). The Flynn effect on the WISC subtests in school children tested for special education services. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. doi:10.1177/073428290937013910.1177/0734282909370139

20.

Kanaya

Ceci

S. J.

Scullin

M. H.

(2003). The rise and fall of IQ in special ed: Historical trends and their implications. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 453–465. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2003.08.00310.1016/j.jsp.2003.08.003

21.

Kanaya

Ceci

S. J.

Scullin

M. H.

(2005). Age differences in secular IQ trends: An individual growth modeling approach. Intelligence, 33, 613–621. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2005.08.00110.1016/j.intell.2005.08.001

22.

Kanaya

MacFarlane

J. R.

Avera

L. M.

(2009). What’s in a name? The inconsistencies of special education diagnoses and labels. In Demir

Celik

(Eds.), Multimedia in education and special education (pp. 185–201). New York, NY: Nova Science.

23.

Kanaya

Scullin

M. H.

Ceci

S. J.

(2003). The Flynn effect and U.S. policies: The impact of rising IQ scores on American society via mental retardation diagnoses. American Psychologist, 58, 1–13. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.58.10.77810.1037/0003-066X.58.10.778

24.

Kaufman

A. S.

(in press). “In what way are apples and oranges alike?” A critique of Flynn’s interpretation of the Flynn Effect. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. doi:10.1177/073428291037334610.1177/0734282910373346

25.

McKinney

J. D.

Feagans

(1984). Academic and behavioral characteristics of learning disabled children and average achievers: Longitudinal studies. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 251–265. doi:10.2307/151048310.2307/1510483

26.

Molfese

V. J.

Modglin

Molfese

D. L.

(2003). The role of environment in the development of readings skills: A longitudinal study of preschool and school-age measures. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 59–67. doi:10.1177/0022219403036001070110.1177/00222194030360010701

27.

Neisser

(1998). The rising curve: Long-term gains in IQ and related measures. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10270-00010.1037/10270-000

28.

Reschly

D. J.

Hosp

J. L.

(2004). State SLD identification policies and practices. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 197–213. doi:10.2307/159367310.2307/1593673

29.

Sanborn

K. J.

Truscott

S. D.

Phelps

McDougal

J. L.

(2003). Does the Flynn effect differ by IQ level in samples of students classified as learning disabled? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 21, 145–159. doi:10.1177/07342829030210020310.1177/073428290302100203

30.

D. L.

Silva

P. A.

(2003). Gender bias in IQ-discrepancy and post-discrepancy definitions of readings disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 4–14. doi:10.1177/0022219403036001020110.1177/00222194030360010201

31.

Siegel

L. S.

(1999). Issues in the definition and diagnosis of learning disabilities: A perspective on Guckenberger v. Boston University. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 304–319. doi:10.1177/00222194990320040510.1177/002221949903200405

32.

Truscott

S. D.

Frank

A. J.

(2001). Does the Flynn effect affect IQ scores of students classified as LD? Journal of School Psychology, 39, 319–334. doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00071-110.1016/S0022-4405(01)00071-1