The present study investigated whether the members of adolescents’ peer groups are similar in reading and spelling disabilities and whether this similarity contributes to subsequent school achievement and educational attainment. The sample consisted of 375 Finnish adolescents whose reading and spelling disabilities were assessed at age 16 with the Finnish dyslexia screening test. The students also completed a sociometric nomination measure that was used to identify their peer groups. Register information on participants’ school grades also was available, and educational attainment in secondary education was recorded 5 years after completion of the 9 years of basic education. The results revealed that the members of adolescent peer groups resembled each other in reading disabilities but not in those of spelling. Reading disabilities and academic achievement shared within the peer group also contributed to educational attainment in secondary education. Finally, reading disabilities played a larger role in educational attainment among males than among females.
BlackorbyJ.WagnerM. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the national longitudinal transition study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–314.
2.
BrownB. B. (1990). Peer groups and peer cultures. In FeldmanS. S.ElliottG. R. (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 171–196). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
ChenX.ChangL.HeY. (2003). The peer group as a context: Mediating and moderating effects on relations between academic achievement and social functioning in Chinese children. Child Development, 74, 710–727.
5.
CillessenA. H. N. (2009). Sociometric methods. In RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.LaursenB. (Eds.), handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 82–99). New York: Guilford.
6.
CookD.DengY.MorganoE. (2007). Friendship influences during early adolescence: The special role of friends’ grade point average. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 325–356.
7.
CsikszentmihalyiM.LarsonR. (1984). Being adolescent: Conflict and growth in the teenage years. New York, NY: Basic Books.
8.
EstellD. B.JonesM. H.PearlR.Van AckerR. (2009). Best friendships of students with and without learning disabilities across late elementary school. Exceptional Children, 76, 110–124.
9.
FairweatherJ. S.ShaverD. M. (1991). Making the transition to postsecondary education and training. Exceptional Children, 57, 264–270.
10.
FivesC. J. (2008). Vocational assessment of secondary students with disabilities and the school psychologist. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 508–522.
11.
FlemingJ. E.CookT. D.StoneC. A. (2002). Interactive influences of perceived social contexts on the reading achievement of urban middle schoolers with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 47–64.
12.
FrankA. R.SitlingtonP. L.CarsonR. R. (1995). Young adults with behavioral disorders: A comparison with peers with mild disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 3, 156–164.
13.
FuligniA. J.EcclesJ. S. (1993). Perceived parent–child relationships and early adolescents’ orientation toward peers. Developmental Psychology, 29, 622–632.
14.
GardnerM.SteinbergL. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41, 625–635.
15.
GoldbergR. J.HigginsE. L.RaskindM. H.HermanK. L. (2003). Predictors of success in individuals with learning disabilities: A qualitative analysis of a 20-year longitudinal study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 222–236.
16.
HallinanM. T.WilliamsR. A. (1990). Students’ characteristics and the peer-influence process. Sociology of Education, 63, 122–132.
17.
HawkeJ. L.OlsonR. K.WillcutE. G.WadsworthS. J.DeFriesJ. C. (2009). Gender ratios for reading difficulties. Dyslexia, 15, 239–242.
18.
HeckR. H.ThomasS. L. (2009). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
HolopainenL.KairaluomaL.NevalaJ.AhonenT.AroM. (Eds.). (2004). Lukivakeuksien seulontamenetelmä nuorille ja aikuisille [Dyslexia screening test for youth and adults]. Jyväskylä, Finland: Niilo Mäki Instituutti.
20.
KandelD. B. (1978a). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427–436.
21.
KandelD. B. (1978b). Similarity in real-life adolescent friendship pairs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 306–312.
22.
KavaleA.FornessS. R. (2000). What definitions of learning disability say and don’t say: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 239–256.
23.
KiesnerJ.PoulinF.NicotraE. (2003). Peer relations across contexts: Individual-network homophily and network inclusion in and after school. Child Development, 74, 1328–1343.
24.
KindermannT. A. (2007). Effects of naturally existing peer groups on changes in academic engagement in a cohort of sixth graders. Child Development, 78, 1186–1203.
25.
KiuruN.AunolaK.VuoriJ.NurmiJ.-E. (2007). The role of peer groups in adolescents’ educational expectations and adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 995–1009.
26.
KiuruN.NurmiJ.-E.AunolaK.Salmela-AroK. (2009). The role of peer groups in adolescents’ educational trajectories. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 521–547.
27.
KiuruN.Salmela-AroK.NurmiJ.-E.ZettergrenP.AndersonH.BergmanL. (2010). Best friends in adolescence show similar educational and occupational careers in early and middle adulthood. Manuscript submitted for publication.
28.
LaursenB.BukowskiW. M.NurmiJ.-E.MarionD.Salmela-AroK.KiuruN. (2010). We try to avoid them: Predicting antipathy between middle school students and groups. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106, 240–256.
29.
LevineP.NourseS. W. (1998). What follow-up studies say about postschool life for young men and women with learning disabilities: A critical look at the literature. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 212–233.
30.
LyytinenH.AroM.HolopainenL. (2004). Dyslexia in Finland. In SmytheI.EverattJ.SalterR. (Eds.), The international book of dyslexia: A guide to practice and resources (pp. 92–96). New York, NY: John Wiley.
31.
MaughanB. (1995). Long-term outcomes of developmental reading problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 36, 357–371.
32.
MaughanB.HagellA. (1996). Poor reading in adulthood: Psychosocial functioning. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 457–476.
33.
MerckenL.SnijdersT. A. B.SteglichC.De VriesH. (2009). Dynamics of adolescent friendship networks and smoking behavior: Social network analyses in six European countries. Social Science and Medicine, 69, 1506–1514.
34.
MurrayC.GoldsteinD. E.NourseS.EdgarP. (2000). The postsecondary school attendance and completion rates of high school graduates with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 119–127.
35.
MuthénB. (1997). Latent variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel data. In RafteryA. (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 453–480). Boston: Blackwell.
OECD (1998). Getting started, settling in: The transition from education to the labour market. Employment Outlook, 60, 81–122.
38.
RaskindM. H.GoldbergR. J.HigginsE. L.HermanK. L. (1999). Patterns of change and predictors of success in individuals with learning disabilities: Results from a twenty-year longitudinal study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 35–49.
39.
RenickM. J.HarterS. (1989). Impact of social comparisons on the developing self-perceptions of learning disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 631–638.
40.
RubinK. H.BukowskiW.ParkerJ. G. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In EisenbergN. (Ed.) & DamonW. (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 619–700). New York, NY: John Wiley.
41.
RutterM.AvshalomC.FergussonD.HorwoorL. J.GoodmanR.MaughanB.. . . CarrollJ. (2004). Sex differences in developmental reading disability: Findings from 4 epidemiological studies. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 2007–2012.
42.
RyanA. M. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72, 1135–1150.
43.
SavolainenH.AhonenT.AroM.TolvanenA.HolopainenL. (2008). Reading comprehension, word reading and spelling as predictors of school achievement and choice of secondary education. Learning and Instruction, 16, 201–210.
44.
SavolainenH.HolopainenL. (2008). Staying on Track of Learning study (ongoing).University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu.
45.
ShaywitzS.EscobarM.ShaywitzB.FletcherJ.MakuchR. (1992). Evidence that dyslexia may represent the lower tail of a normal distribution of reading ability. New England Journal of Medicine, 326, 143–150.
SitlingtonP. L.FrankA. R. (1990). Are adolescents with learning disabilities successfully crossing the bridge into adult life?Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 97–111.
48.
SpreenO. (1987). Learning disabled children growing up: A follow-up into adulthood. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
49.
StanovichK. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
50.
SteglichC.SnijdersT. A. B.PearsonM. (in press). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology.
51.
UrbergK. A.DeğirmencioğluS. M.TolsonJ. M. (1998). Adolescent friendship selection and termination: The role of similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 703–710.
52.
UrbergK. A.LuoQ.PilgrimC.DeğirmencioğluS. M. (2003). A two-stage model of peer influence in adolescent substance use: Individual and relationship-specific differences in susceptibility to influence. Addictive Behavior, 28, 1243–1256.
53.
ValåsH. (1999). Students with learning disabilities and low-achieving students: Peer acceptance, loneliness, self-esteem, and depression. Social Psychology of Education, 3, 173–192.
54.
Van HoutteM. (2004). Why boys achieve less at school than girls: the differences between boys’ and girls’ academic culture. Educational Studies, 30, 159–173.
55.
WienerJ.SchneiderB. H. (2002). A multisource exploration of the friendship patterns of children with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 127–141.
56.
ZelekeS. (2004). Self-concepts of students with learning disabilities and their normally achieving peers: A review. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 19, 145–170.
