The purpose of the study was to investigate the metacognitive abilities of students with LD as they engage in math problem solving and to determine processing differences between these students and their low- and average-achieving peers (n = 73). Students thought out loud as they solved three math problems of increasing difficulty. Protocols were coded and analyzed to determine frequency of cognitive verbalizations and productive and nonproductive metacognitive verbalizations. Results indicated different patterns of metacognitive activity for ability groups when type of metacognitive verbalization and problem difficulty were considered. Implications for instruction are discussed.
BannertM.MengelkampC. (2008). Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalization method affect learning?Metacognition and Learning, 3, 39–58.
2.
BryantD. P.BryantB. R.HammillD. D. (2000). Characteristic behaviors of students with LD who have teacher-identified math weaknesses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 168–177.
CaseL. P.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (1992). Improving the mathematical problem-solving skills of students with learning disabilities: Self-regulated strategy development. Journal of Special Education, 26, 1–19.
5.
CrowleyK.ShragerJ.SieglerR. S. (1997). Strategy discovery as a competitive negotiation between metacognitive and associative mechanisms. Developmental Review, 17, 462–489.
6.
De CorteE.GreerB.VerschaffelL. (1996). Mathematics teaching and learning. In BerlinerD.CalfeeR. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 491–549). New York: Macmillan.
7.
DesoeteA.RoeyersH.BuysseA. (2001). Metacognition and mathematical problem solving in Grade 3. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 435–449.
8.
EfklidesA.KiorpelidouK.KiosseoglouG. (2006). Worked-out examples in mathematics: Effects on performance and metacognitive experiences. In DesoeteA.VeenmanM. (Eds.), Metacognition in mathematics (pp. 11–33). New York: NOVA.
FlavellJ. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
11.
FlavellJ. H.MillerP. H.MillerS. A. (1993). Cognitive development (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.
FonteynM. E.KuipersB.GrobeS. J. (1993). A description of think aloud method and protocol analysis. Qualitative Human Research, 3, 430–441.
13.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2002). Mathematical problem-solving profiles of students with mathematics disabilities with and without comorbid reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 563–573.
14.
GarrettA. J.MazzoccoM. M. M.BakerL. (2006). Development of the metacognitive skills of prediction and evaluation in children with and without math disability. Learning Disability Research and Practice, 21, 77–88.
15.
GearyD. C. (2003). Learning disabilities and arithmetic: Problem-solving differences and cognitive deficits. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 199–212). New York: Guilford.
16.
GearyD. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4–15.
17.
GonzalezJ. E. J.EspinelA. I. G. (2002). Strategy choice in solving arithmetic word problems: Are there differences between students with learning disabilities, G-V poor performance and typical achievement students?Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 113–120.
18.
JanvierC. (1987). Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
JohnsonE. S.HumphreyM.MellardD.WoodsK.SwansonH. L. (2010). Cognitive processing deficits and students with specific learning disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33, 3–18.
20.
JohnstoneC. J.Bottsford-MillerN. A.ThompsonS. J. (2006). Using the think aloud method (cognitive labs) to evaluate test design for students with disabilities and English language learners. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
21.
JordanN. C.HanichL. B. (2000). Mathematical thinking in second-grade children with different forms of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 6, 567–578.
22.
LewisA. B. (1989). Training students to represent arithmetic word problems. Educational Psychology, 81, 521–531.
23.
LucangeliD.CabreleS. (2006). The relationship of metacognitive knowledge, skills and beliefs in children with and without mathematical learning disabilities. In DesoeteA.VeenmanM. V. (Eds.), Metacognition in mathematics education (pp. 103–133). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
24.
LucangeliD.CornoldiC. (1997). Mathematics and metacognition: What is the nature of the relationship?Mathematical Cognition, 3, 121–139.
25.
MaloneL. D.MastropieriM. A. (1991). Reading comprehensive instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 53, 270–279.
26.
MasonH.MeadanH.HedinL.CorsoL. (2006). Self-regulated strategy development instruction for expository text comprehension. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 47–52.
27.
MayerR. E. (1985). Mathematical ability. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Human abilities: Information processing approach (pp. 127–150). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
28.
MontagueM. (1991). Gifted and learning-disabled gifted students’ knowledge and use of mathematical problem-solving strategies. Journal for Education of the Gifted, 14, 393–411.
29.
MontagueM. (1997). Student perception, mathematical problem solving, and learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 46–53.
30.
MontagueM. (2003). Solve it! A practical approach to teaching mathematical problem solving skills. Reston, VA: Exceptional Innovations.
31.
MontagueM. (2008). Self-regulation strategies to improve mathematical problem solving for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 37–44.
32.
MontagueM.ApplegateB. (1993a). Mathematical problem-solving characteristics of middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 27, 175–201.
33.
MontagueM.ApplegateB. (1993b). Middle school students’ mathematical problem solving: An analysis of think-aloud protocols. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 16, 19–32.
34.
MontagueM.EndersC.DietzS. (2010). The effects of Solve It! on middle school students’ math problem solving. Manuscript submitted for publication.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
37.
NussinsonR.KoriatA. (2008). Correcting experience-based judgments: The perseverance of subjective experience in the face of the correction of judgment. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 159–174.
38.
OstadA.SorensonP. M. (2007). Private speech and strategy-use patterns: Bidirectional comparisons of students with and without mathematical disabilities in a developmental perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 2–14.
39.
PintrichP. R.AndersonE. M.KlobucarC. (1994). Intraindividual differences in motivation and cognition in students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 360–370.
40.
SchoenfeldA. H. (1987). What’s all the fuss about metacognition? In SchoenfeldA. H. (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189–215). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
SilverE. A. (1987). Foundations of cognitive theory research for mathematics problem solving. In SchoenfeldA. (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 33–60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
SperlingR. A.HowardB. C.StaleyR.DuBoisN. (2004). Metacognition and self-regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10, 117–139.
43.
StoneC. A.MayA. L. (2002). The accuracy of academic self-evaluations in adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 370–383.
44.
SwansonL. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 306–314.
45.
TraininG.SwansonH. L. (2005). Cognition, metacognition, and achievement of college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 28, 261–272.
46.
Van LuitJ. E. H.KroesbergenE. H. (2006). Teaching metacognitive skills to students with learning disabilities. In DesoeteA.VeenmanM. (Eds.), Metacognition in mathematics education (pp. 177–190). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
47.
VeenmanM. V.SpaansM. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15, 159–176.
48.
VeenmanM. V. J.Van Hout-WoltersB. H. A. M.AfflerbachP. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition Learning, 1, 3–14.
49.
WongB. Y. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS.ButlerD. L. (2006). Cognitive strategy instruction research in learning disabilities. In SwansonH. L.HarrisK. R.GrahamS. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 383–402). New York: Guilford.
50.
YoungA. K. (2005). Direct from the source: The value of think-aloud data in understanding learning. Journal of Educational Inquiry, 6, 19–33.
51.
ZimmermanB. E. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64–70.
