Difficulties in inhibitory processes have been shown to characterize the performance of poor comprehenders. However, the inhibitory inefficiency of poor comprehenders is most often assessed by their resistance to proactive interference, that is, the ability to suppress off-goal task information from working memory (WM). In two studies tasks assessing resistance to proactive interference (intrusion errors), response to distracters (Text With Distracters task) and prepotent response inhibition (Stroop and Hayling tests), along with WM measures, were administered to children aged 10 to 11, both good and poor comprehenders. The aim of the study was to specifically determine whether general or specific inhibitory factors affect poor comprehenders’ reading difficulties. Results showed that poor comprehenders, compared to good ones, are impaired in WM tasks and in inhibitory tasks that assess resistance to proactive interference. This suggests that reading comprehension difficulties of poor comprehenders are related to specific inhibitory problems.
Barca, L., Burani, C., & Arduino, L.S. ( 2002). Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers34, 424-434.
2.
Belacchi, C., Carretti, B., & Cornoldi, C. (in press). The role of working memory and updating in Coloured Raven Matrices performance in typically developing children. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.
3.
Borella, E., Carretti, B., & De Beni, R. (2008). Working memory, and inhibition across the adult life span. Acta Psychologica, 128, 33-44.
4.
Brown, A.L., & Day, J.D. ( 1983). Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour , 22, 1-14.
5.
Burgess, P.W., & Shallice, T. ( 1996). Response suppression, initiation and strategy use following frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia, 34, 263-273.
6.
Cain, K. ( 2006). Children’s reading comprehension: The role of working memory in normal and impaired development. In S. J. Pickering (Ed.), Working memory and education (pp. 61-91). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
7.
Carretti, B., Borella, E., Cornoldi, C., & De Beni, R. (2009). Role of working memory in explaining the performance of individuals with specific reading comprehension difficulties: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences , 19, 246-251.
8.
Carretti, B., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Palladino, P. ( 2004). What happens to information to be suppressed in working memory tasks? Short and long term effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 1059-1084.
9.
Carretti, B., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Romanó, M. (2005). Updating in working memory: A comparison of poor and good comprehenders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 45-66.
10.
Carretti, B., Cornoldi, C., & Pelegrina, S. ( 2007). Which factors influence number updating in working memory? The effect of size distance and suppression. British Journal of Psychology, 16, 45-60.
11.
Censabella, S., & Noël, M.P. (2005). The inhibition of exogenous distracting information in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 400-410.
12.
Connelly, S.L., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R.T. ( 1991). Age and reading: The impact of distraction. Psychology and Aging, 6, 533-541.
13.
Cornoldi, C., & Colpo, G. ( 1998). Prove di lettura MT per la scuola elementare [Tests of reading MT for primary school]. Florence, Italy: Organizzazioni Speciali.
14.
Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. ( 1996). Reading comprehension profiles. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 113-136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Cornoldi, C., Miato, L., Molin, A., & Poli, S. ( 1992). PRCR-2. Prove di prerequisito per le diagnosi delle difficoltà di lettura e scrittura [Tests for the diagnosis of reading and writing difficulties] . Florence, Italy: Organizzazioni Speciali.
16.
Cornoldi, C., & Oakhill, J. V. (Eds.). (1996). Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
De Beni, R., Borella, E., Carretti, B., Marigo C., & Nava, L.A. ( 2008). BAC. Portfolio per la valutazione del benessere e delle abilità cognitive nell’età adulta e avanzata [The assessment of well-being and cognitive abilities in adulthood and aging]. Florence, Italy: Giunti OS.
18.
De Beni, R., & Palladino, P. ( 2000). Intrusion errors in working memory tasks. Are they related to reading comprehension ability? Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 131-143.
19.
De Beni, R., Palladino, P., Pazzaglia, F., & Cornoldi, C. ( 1998). Increases in intrusion errors and working memory deficit of poor comprehenders. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 51A, 305-320.
20.
Defior, S., Fonseca, L., & Gottheil, B. ( 2006). LEE. Test de lectura y escritura en español [LEE. A reading and writing test in Spanish]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidos.
21.
Dempster, F.N. ( 1991). Inhibitory processes: A neglected dimension of intelligence . Intelligence, 15, 157-173.
22.
Friedman, N.P., & Miyake, A. ( 2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 133, 101-135.
23.
Gernsbacher, M.A. ( 1997). Two decades of structure building. Discourse Processes, 23, 265-304.
24.
Gernsbacher, M.A., & Faust, M.E. ( 1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 245-262.
25.
Gernsbacher, M.A., Varner, K.R., & Faust, M.E. ( 1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition , 16, 430-445.
26.
Golden, C.J. ( 1994). Stroop: Test de colores y palabras [Stroop Color and Word Test]. Madrid, Spain: TEA.
27.
Harnishfeger, K.K., & Bjorklund, D.F. (1993). The ontogeny of inhibition mechanisms: A renewed approach to cognitive development. In M. L. Howe & R. Pasnak (Eds.), Emerging themes in cognitive development: Vol. 1. Foundations (pp. 28-49). New York, NY, US: Springer-Verlag.
28.
Hasher, L., Chung, C., May, C.P., & Foong, N. ( 2002). Time of testing and proactive interference. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 200-207.
29.
Li, K.Z.H., Hasher, L., Jonas, D., Rahhal, T., & May, C.P. ( 1998). Distractability, circadian arousal, and aging: A boundary condition?Psychology and Aging, 13, 574-583.
30.
Nation, K., Adams, J.W., Bowyer-Crane, C.A., & Snowling, M.J. (1999). Working memory deficits in poor comprehenders reflect underlying language impairments. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 139-158.
31.
Nation, K., & Snowling, M.J. (1999). Developmental differences in sensitivity to semantic relations among good and poor comprehenders: Evidence from semantic priming. Cognition, 70, B1-B13.
32.
Nichelli, F., Scala, G.G., Vago, C., Riva, D., & Bulgheroni, S. (2004). Age related trends in Stroop and conflicting motor response task findings. Child Neuropsychology , 11, 431-443.
33.
Nigg, J.T. ( 2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy . Psychological Bulletin, 126, 220-246.
34.
Nyberg, L., Brocki, K., Tillman, C., & Bohlin, G. ( 2009). The proposed interaction between working memory and inhibition . European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 84-111.
35.
Palladino, P., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. ( 2001). Working memory and updating processes in reading comprehension . Memory and Cognition, 29, 344-354.
36.
Roberts, R.J., & Pennington, B.F. (1996). An interactive framework for examining prefrontal cognitive processes. Developmental Neuropsychology, 12, 105-126.
37.
Stothard, S.E., & Hulme, C. ( 1992). Reading comprehension difficulties in children: The role of language comprehension and working memory skills. Reading and Writing, 4, 245-256.
38.
Swanson, H.L., Howard, C.B., & Saez, L. ( 2006). Do different components of working memory underlie different subgroups of reading disabilities? Journal of Learning Disabilities , 39, 252-269.
39.
Swanson, H.L., & Siegel, L. ( 2001). Learning disabilities as a working memory deficit. Issues in Education: Contributions of Educational Psychology, 7, 1-48.
Turner, W.E. ( 1989). The role of language-related factors in reading disability . In D. Shankweiler & I. Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disability (pp. 93-131). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
42.
van der Sluis, S., de Jong, P.F., & van der Leij, A. (2004). Inhibition and shifting in children with learning deficits in arithmetic and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 239-266.
43.
Wright, I., Waterman, M., Prescott, H., & Murdoch-Eaton, D. (2003). A new Stroop-like measure of inhibitory function development: Typical developmental trends. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 561-575.
44.
Yuste, C. ( 1998). Batería de aptitudes diferenciales y generales. Renovado [Differential and general aptitude test battery. Updated]. Madrid, Spain: CEPE.
