In this study, we aimed to ascertain whether it is possible to create reading contexts that eliminate the impact of word recognition on reading comprehension and permit pupils with reading disabilities (RD) to attain a level of comprehension similar to that of their peers without RD. Specifically, the study compared a traditional reading situation with one of reading with aids (joint reading). In both situations, pupils' comprehension level was assessed by means of a summary and a series of inferential questions, and we controlled the effect on comprehension of word recognition, previous knowledge, rhetorical competence, and working memory. The results showed that the aids provided during reading do not eliminate the effect of word recognition, but they do permit readers with RD to attain a comprehension level similar to that of their peers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allor, J.H., Fuchs, D., & Mathes, P. (2001). Do students with and without lexical retrieval weaknesses respond differently to instruction?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 264—275.
2.
Armbruster, B.B., Anderson, T.H., & Ostertag, J. (1987). Does text structure/ summarization instruction facilitate learning expository text?Reading Research Quarterly , 22, 331—346.
3.
Armbruster, B.B., Anderson, T.H., & Ostertag, J. (1989). Teaching text structure to improve reading and writing. ReadingTeacher, 42, 130—137.
4.
Bell, L.C., & Perfetti, C.A. (1994). Reading skill: Some adult comparisons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 244—255.
5.
Blachman, B.A., Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Clonan, S.M., Shaywitz, B.A., et al. (2004). Effects of intensive reading remediation for second and third graders and 1-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 444— 461.
6.
Bovair, S., & Kieras, D.E. (1985). A guide to propositional analysis for research on technical prose. In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text (pp. 315—362). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Bowers, P., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms, and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 69—85.
8.
Brown, R., Pressley, M., van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 18—37.
9.
Bryant, P. (2002). Children's thoughts about reading and spelling . Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 199—216.
10.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 489—503.
11.
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2004). Reading comprehension difficulties. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of children's literacy (pp. 313—338). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
12.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2000). Investigating the causes of reading comprehension failure: The comprehension— age match design. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 31—40.
13.
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31—42.
14.
Calvo, A. (2000). Subtipos en lectores con dificultades en el aprendizaje de la lectura [Subtypes of children with difficulties in learning to read] . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Murcia , Spain.
15.
Catts, H. (1989). Defining dyslexia as a developmental language disorder. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 50—76.
16.
Cole, M. (1997). Cultural mechanism of cognitive development. In E. Amsel & K. A. Renninger (Eds.), Change and development (pp. 245—263). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151— 216). London: Academic Press.
18.
Cuetos, F., Domínguez, A., Miera, G., & de Vega, M. (1997). Diferencias individuales en el procesamiento léxico [Individual differences in lexical processing]. Estudios de Psicología, 57, 15—27.
19.
Cuetos, F., & Ramos, J.L. (1997). Batería de evaluación de los procesos lectores en el alumnado del tercer ciclo de educación primaria y educación secundaria obligatoria (PROLEC-SE) [Assessment battery for reading processes in older primary and secondary students]. Madrid: TEA.
20.
Dole, J.A., Duffy, G.G., Roehler, L.R., & Pearson, P.D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research , 61, 239—264.
21.
Domínguez Martínez, A., & Cuetos Vega, F. (1992). Desarrollo de las habilidades de reconocimiento de palabras en niños con distinta competencia lectora [Development of word recognition skills in children with different reading abilities]. Cognitiva, 4, 193—208.
22.
Duffy, G.C., Roehler, L.R., Sivan, E., Rackliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M., et al. (1987). Effects of explaining the reasoning associated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly , 22, 347—368.
23.
Elosúa, R., García Madruga, J.A., Gárate, M., Gutiérrez, F., & Luque, J.L. (1993). Prueba de amplitud lectora [Reading span test] . Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.
24.
Ellis, N. (1990). Reading, phonological skills and short-term memory: Interactive tributaries of development. Journal of Research in Reading, 13, 107—122.
25.
Felton, R.H. (1992). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education , 12, 212—229.
26.
Fleisher, L., Jenkins, J., & Pany, D. (1979). Effects on poor readers' comprehension of training in rapid decoding. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 30—48.
27.
Frederiksen, J.R., & Warren, B.M. (1987). A cognitive framework for developing expertise in reading. In R. Glaser (Eds.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 1—39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
Graesser, A., & Goodman, S.H. (1985). How to construct conceptual graph structures. In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (Eds.), Understanding expository text (pp. 363—383). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
Graesser, A., & Britton, B. (1996). Five metaphors for text understanding. In B. Britton & A. Graesser (Eds.), Models of understanding text (pp. 341—352) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
Goldman, S.R., & Rakestraw, J.A. (2000). Structural aspects of constructing meaning from text. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson , & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 311—335). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31.
Goodman, K. (1990). El lenguaje integral: Un camino fácil para el desarrollo del lenguaje [Whole language: An easy path to language development] . Lectura y Vida, 1(2), 1—13.
Hatcher, P., Hulme, C., & Ellis, A. (1994). Ameliorating early reading failure by integrating the teaching of reading and phonological skills: the phonological linkage hypothesis. Child Development, 65, 41—55.
34.
Hernández-Valle, I., & Jiménez, J. (2001). Conciencia fonémica y retraso lector: ¿Es determinante la edad en la eficacia de la intervención? [Phonemic awareness and delay in reading: Is age a determinant of the effectiveness of intervention?]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 24, 379—395.
35.
Jenkins, J.R., Barksdale, A., & Clinton, L.R. (1978). Improving reading comprehension and oral reading: Generalization across behaviors, settings, and time. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11(10), 5—14.
36.
Jenkins, J.R., Fuchs, L.S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S.L. (2003a). Accuracy and fluency in list and context reading of skilled and RD Groups: Absolute and relative performance levels. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 237—245.
37.
Jenkins, J.R., Fuchs, L.S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S.L. (2003b). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 719—729.
38.
Jiménez, J.E. (1997). A reading-level design study of phonemic processes underlying reading disabilities in a transparent orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 23—40.
39.
Joanisse, M.F., Manis, F.R., Keating, P., & Seidenberg, M.S. (1999). Language deficits in dyslexic children: Speech perception, phonology, and morphology. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 30—60.
40.
Joshi, R.M., & Aarón, P.G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85—97.
41.
Just, M.A. & Carpenter, P.A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
42.
Klenk, L., & Kibby, M.W. (2000). Remediating reading difficulties: Appraising the past, reconciling the present, constructing the future. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal , P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 667—690). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43.
Lovett, M.W., Borden, S.L., Deluca, T., Lacerenza, L., Benson, N.J., & Brackstone, D. (1994). Treating the core deficits of developmental dyslexia: Evidence of transfer-of-learning following phonologically and strategy-based reading training programs. Developmental Psychology, 30, 805— 822.
44.
Lovett, M.W., Steinbach, J.C., & Frijters, J. (2000). Remediating the core deficits of developmental reading disability: A double-deficit perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 334—358.
45.
Oakhill, J.V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P.E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes , 18, 443—468.
46.
Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2000). Measures of effect size for comparative studies: Applications, interpretations, and limitations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 241—286.
47.
Olson, R.K., Wise, B., Ring, J., & Johnson, M. (1997). Computer-based remedial training in phoneme awareness and phonological recoding: Effects on the posttraining development of word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 235— 253.
48.
Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, A.L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117—175.
49.
Peeck, J., van den Bosch, A.B., & Kreupeling, J.W. (1982). Effect of mobilizing prior knowledge on learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology , 74, 771—777.
50.
Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
51.
Perfetti, C.A., & Hogaboam, T. (1975). Relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skill. Journal of Educational Psychology , 67, 461—469.
52.
Pressley, M. (1976). Mental imagery helps eight-year-olds remember what they read. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 355— 359.
53.
Pressley, M. (1999). Cómo enseñar a leer [Reading instruction that works]. Barcelona: Paidós.
54.
Pressley, M. (2000) What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson , & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 545—561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55.
Rack, J.P., Snowling, M.J., & Olson, R.K. (1992). The non-word reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 29—53.
56.
Rego, L.L.B., & Bryant, P.E. (1993). The connection between phonological, syntactic and semantic skills and children's reading and spelling. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 8, 235—246.
57.
Roehler, L.R., & Duffy, G.G. (1984). Direct explanation of comprehension processes . In G. G. Duffy, L. R. Roehler, & J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions (pp. 265—280). New York: Longman.
58.
Rueda, M.I., & Sánchez, E. (1996). Relación entre conocimiento fonémico y dislexia: Un estudio instruccional [Relationship between phonemic knowledge and dyslexia: an instructional study]. Cognitiva, 8, 215—234.
59.
Samuels, S.J., Dahl, P., & Archwamety, T. (1974). Effects of hypothesis/test training on reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology , 66, 835—844.
60.
Sánchez, E. (1998). Comprensión y redacción de textos [Comprehension and writing of texts]. Barcelona: Edebé.
61.
Sánchez, E., & García, J.R. (2003). Los retos de la alfabetización: Cómo comprender lo que se lee cuando aún no se ha aprendido del todo a leer [The challenges of literacy: How to understand what one reads when one has not fully learned how to read]. Psicopedagogia: Revista da Associação Brasileira de Psicopedagogia, 20(62), 116—127.
62.
Sánchez, E., García, J.R., Gonzalez, A.J. & Herrera, P. (2006). The teaching of comprehension strategies from joint reading: Proposal and evidence. Manuscript in preparation.
63.
Sánchez, E., Gonzalez, A.J., & García, R. (2002). Competencia retórica: Una propuesta para interpretar las dificultades de comprensión [Rhetorical competence: A proposal for interpreting the difficulties of comprehension]. Psicothema, 14(1), 77— 85.
64.
Sánchez, E., Rosales, J., & Suárez, S. (1999). Interacción profesor/alumnos y comprensión de textos: Qué se hace y qué se puede hacer [Teacher/pupil interaction and text comprehension: What is done and what could be done]. Cultura y Educación, 14—15, 1—89.
65.
Sánchez, E., & Rueda, M.I. (1991). Segmental awareness and dyslexia: Is it possible to learn to segment well and yet continue to read and write poorly?Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 3, 11— 18.
66.
Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2004). Linguistic processes in reading and spelling: The case of alphabetic writing systems: English, French, German, and Spanish . In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of children's literacy (pp. 43—66). Boston: Kluwer.
67.
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360— 407.
68.
Stanovich, K. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and garden variety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590—604.
69.
Stanovich, K., & Siegel, L. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 24—53.
70.
Swanson, H.L., & Hovell, M. (2001). Working memory, short-term memory and speech rate as predictors of children's reading performance at different ages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 720— 734.
71.
Tan, A., & Nicholson, T. (1997). Flashcards revisited: Training poor readers to read words faster improves their comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 276—288.
72.
Troia, G.A. (1999). Phonological awareness intervention research: A critical review of the experimental methodology. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 28—52.
73.
Torgesen, J.K. (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. Journal of School Psychology, 40(1), 7—26.
74.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C., Alexander, A.W., & Conway, T. (1997). Preventive and remedial interventions for children with severe reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 51—61.
75.
van den Bosch, K., van Bon, W., & Schreuder, R. (1995). Poor readers' decoding skills: Effects of training with limited exposure duration. Reading Research Quarterly , 30, 110—125.
76.
van Dijk, T.A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
77.
Vidal-Abarca, E. (2002). Las dificultades de comprensión I: Diferencias en procesos de comprensión entre los lectores nor-males y con dificultades de comprensión [Comprehension difficulties I: Differences in comprehension processes between normal readers and those with comprehension difficulties] In A. Miranda, E. Vidal-Abarca, & M. Soriano, Evaluación e intervención psicoeducativa en dificultades de aprendizaje [Psychoeducational assessment and intervention in learning difficulties] (pp. 129—156). Madrid : Pirámide.
78.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Lyon, G.R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 33, 223—238.
79.
Wagner, R.K., & Torgesen, J.K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin,101, 192—212.
80.
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., & Rashotte, C. (1994). The development of reading related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bi-directional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73—87.
81.
Windfuhr, K.L., & Snowling, M.J. (2001). The relationship between paired associate learning and phonological skills in normally developing readers . Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 160— 173.
82.
Wolf, M. (1991). Naming speed and reading: The contribution of the cognitive neurosciences. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 123—141.
83.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. (1999). The double deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415—438.
