Is There a Common Linkage Among Reading Comprehension,Visual Attention,and Magnocellular Processing?

Abstract

The authors examined the relationships between reading comprehension, visual attention, and magnocellular processing in 42 Grade 7 students. The goal was to quantify the sensitivity of visual attention and magnocellular visual processing as concomitants of poor reading comprehension in the absence of either vision therapy or cognitive intervention. Nineteen good readers (M = grade equivalent of 11.2) and 23 poor readers (M = grade equivalent of 3.5) were identified. Participants were tested for visual attention skills (Cognitive Assessment System: CAS) and magnocellular integrity (Coherent Motion Threshold: CM). Individual and combined correlations of dependent variables with reading were significant at the 0.01 level. When combined, the two tests (CAS + CM) accounted for 61% of the variance in reading comprehension. Logistic regression analysis measured sensitivity of the two diagnostic tests. Attention tests correctly classified 95.7% of poor readers, and coherent motion correctly classified 78.3% of poor readers. When the data were combined, 91.3% of poor readers were correctly classified. The research reinforces the notion that a common linkage exists between reading comprehension, visual attention, and magnocellular processing. Diagnostic test batteries for students who have been identified as reading disabled should include magnocellular and visual attention tests. Procedures to diagnose and ameliorate these disabilities are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bassi, C.J. , & Lehmkuhle, S. (1990). Clinical implications of parallel visual pathways. Optometry: Journal of the American Optometric Association , 61, 98—110.

Bender, L. (1958). Problems in conceptualization in children with developmental dyslexia. In P. H. Hoch & J. Zubin (Eds.), Psychopathology of communication (pp. 155— 176). New York: Grune & Stratton.

Cheng, A. , Eysel, U.T. , & Vidyasagar, T.R. (2004). The role of the magnocellular pathway in serial deployment of visual attention. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 2188—2192.

Clark, J.J. (1999). Spatial attention and latencies of saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 39, 585—602.

Eden, G.F. , & Moats, L. (2002). The role of neuroscience in the remediation of students with dyslexia. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1080—1084.

Eden, G.F. , VanMeter, J.W. , Rumsey,, Maisog ,, Woods ,, & Zeffiro , (1996). Abnormal processing of visual motion in dyslexia revealed by functional brain imaging. Nature, 382, 66—69.

Faceotti, A. , Paganoni, P. , Turatto, M. , Marzola, V. , & Mascetti, G.G. (2000). Visual— spatial attention in developmental dyslexia. Cortex, 36, 109—123.

Halperin, J.M. (1996). Conceptualizing, describing, and measuring components of attention. In G. R. Lyon & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 119—135). Baltimore : Brookes.

Henderson, J.M. (1992). Visual attention and eye movement control during reading and picture viewing. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and cognition (pp. 260—283). New York: Springer Verlag.

10.

Hoffman, J.E. , & Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics , 57, 787—795.

11.

Kaernbach, C. (1991). Simple adaptive testing with weighted up and down method. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 227—229.

12.

Lovegrove, W.J. , Martin, F. , & Slaghuis, W. (1986). A theoretical and experimental case for a visual deficit in specific reading disability. Cognitive Neuropsychology , 3, 225—267.

13.

MacGinitie, W.H. , & MacGinitie, R.K. (1989) Gates-MacGinitie reading tests (3rd ed.). Chicago: Riverside.

14.

McConkie, G.E. , Reddix, M.D. , & Zola, D. (1992). Perception and cognition in reading: Where is the meeting point? In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and cognition (pp. 293—303). New York: Springer Verlag.

15.

Moores, E. , Laiti, L. , & Chelazzi, L. (2003). Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 182—189.

16.

Naglieri, J. , & Das, J.P. (1997). Cognitive Assessment System interpretive handbook . Itasca, IL: Riverside.

17.

Sergeant, J. (1996). A theory of attention: An information processing perspective. In G. R. Lyon & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 57—69). Baltimore : Brookes.

18.

Shaywitz, S.E. (1998). Dyslexia. The New England Journal of Medicine, 338, 307—312.

19.

Sherman, S.M. , & Koch, C. (1986). The control of retino—geniculate transmission in the mammalian lateral geniculate nucleus. Experimental Brain Research/ Experimentelle Hirnforschung/Experimentation Cérébrale, 63, 1—20.

20.

Skottun, B.C. (2005). Magnocellular reading and dyslexia (Letter to the Editor). Vision Research, 45, 133—134.

21.

Solan, H.A. , Hansen, P.C. , Shelley-Tremblay, J. , & Ficarra, A. (2003). Coherent motion threshold measurements for M-cell difference for above- and below-average readers. Optometry: Journal of the American Optometric Association, 74, 727— 734.

22.

Solan, H.A. , Shelley-Tremblay, J. , Ficarra, A. , Silverman, M. , & Larson, S. (2003). Effect of attention therapy on reading comprehension . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 556—563.

23.

Solan, H.A. , Shelley-Tremblay, J. , Hansen, P.C. , & Larson, S. (2004). M-cell deficit and reading disability: A preliminary study of the effects of temporal vision processing therapy. Optometry: Journal of the American Optometric Association, 75, 640— 650.

24.

Stein, J. , & Walsh, V. (1997). To see but not to read: The magnocellular theory of dyslexia. Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 147— 152.

25.

Steinman, S.B. , Steinman, B.A. , & Garzia, R.P. (1998). Vision and attention II: Is visual attention a mechanism through which a deficient magnocellular pathway might cause a reading disability? Optometry and Vision Science, 75, 674—681.

26.

Stroop, J. (1935). Studies in interference in serial, verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643—661.

27.

Talcott, J.B. , Hansen, P.C. , Asoku, E.L. , & Stein, J.F. (2000). Visual motion sensitivity in dyslexia: Evidence of temporal and energy integration deficits. Neuropsychologia , 38, 935—943.

28.

Temple, E. , Deutsch, G.K. , Poldrack, R.K. , Miller, S.L. , Tallal, P. , Merzenich, M.M. , et al. (2003). Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: Evidence from functional MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America , 100, 2680—2685.

29.

Treisman, A.M. , & Gelade, A. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97—136.

30.

Vidyasagar, T.R. (2005). Attentional gating in primary visual cortex: A physiological basis for dyslexia. Perception, 34, 903—911.

31.

Wolf, M. (1999). What time may tell: Toward a new conceptualization of developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 3—28.