Recently, talk of a new type of learning disability (LD)—a foreign language learning disability, or FLLD—has made its way into the LD and foreign language (FL) literature. However, no empirical evidence has been published to support the concept of a “disability” for FL learning by those professionals who use the term. In this article, the author takes the position that there is not a distinct “disability” that can be called an FLLD. He reviews several years of research evidence indicating that any proposal for such a distinct entity is problematic. To support his position, he reviews problems with the current definition and diagnostic criteria for LD. He then cites the many difficulties inherent in the development and use of (a) a logically consistent, easily operationalized, and empirically valid definition of and (b) diagnostic criteria for the FLLD concept. The author then discusses how FL learning problems occur along a continuum of very strong to very poor language learners, and he explains how the proponents of an FLLD misuse the concept of FL aptitude. Finally, the author cites implications resulting from the research evidence on FL learning problems and use of the term FLLD.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aaron, P.G. (1997). The impending demise of the discrepancy formula . Review of Educational Research, 67, 461—502.
2.
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL). (1989). American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages proficiency guidelines. Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: Author.
3.
American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
4.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author .
5.
Arries, J. (1999). Learning disabilities and foreign languages: A curriculum approach to the design of inclusive courses. Modern Language Journal, 83, 98—110.
6.
Barr, V. (1993). Foreign language requirements and students with learning disabilities. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. EDD00036)
7.
Blachman, B. (1988). The futile search for a theory of learning disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 286—288.
8.
Carroll, J. (1962). The prediction of success in intensive foreign language training. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Training and research in education (pp. 87—136). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
9.
Carroll, J. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers' College Record, 64, 723—733.
10.
Carroll, J. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83—117). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
11.
Carroll, J. (1990). Cognitive abilities in foreign language aptitude: Then and now. In T. Parry & C. Stansfield (Eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 1—29). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12.
Carroll, J., & Sapon, S. (1959, 2000). Modern language aptitude test (MLAT): Manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp. (Republished by Second Language Testing, Inc., www.2lti.com)
13.
Dinklage, J. (1971). Inability to learn a foreign language. In G. Blaine & C. Mc-Arthur (Eds.). Emotional problems of the student (pp. 185—206). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
14.
Dombrowski, S., Kamphaus, R., & Reynolds, C. (2004). After the demise of the discrepancy: Proposed learning disabilities diagnostic criteria. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 4, 364—372.
15.
Driscoll, K. (2004). The foreign language requirement and students with learning disabilities: An analysis of policies and procedures. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64 (04), 1198. (UMI No. 3087622)
16.
Dufva, M., & Voeten, M. (1999). Native language literacy and phonological memory as prerequisites for learning English as a foreign language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 329—348.
17.
Ehrman, M. (1990). The role of personality type in adult language learning: An ongoing investigation. In T. Parry & C. Stansfield (Eds.), Language aptitude reconsidered (pp. 126—176). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18.
Ehrman, M. (1998). The Modern Language Aptitude Test for predicting learning success and advising students. Applied Language Learning , 9, 31—70.
19.
Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. (1995). Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. Modern Language Journal, 79, 67—89
20.
Ellis, A. (1985). The cognitive neuropsychology of developmental (and acquired) dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 169—205.
21.
Flanagan, D., Keiser, S., Bernier, J., & Ortiz, S. (2003). Diagnosis of learning disability in adulthood . Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
22.
Flanagan, D., Ortiz, S., Alfonso, V., & Mascolo, J. (2002). The achievement test desk reference (ATDR): Comprehensive assessment and learning disabilities. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
23.
Francis, D., Fletcher, J., Steubing, K., Lyon, R., Shaywitz, B., & Shaywitz, S. (2005). Psychometric approaches to the identification of LD: IQ and achievement scores are not sufficient. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 98—108.
24.
Freed, B. (1987). Exemptions from the foreign language requirement: A review of recent literature, problems, and policy. Association of Department of Foreign Languages (ADFL)Bulletin, 18, 13—17.
25.
Gajar, A. (1987). Foreign language learning disabilities: The identification of predictive and diagnostic variables. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 327-330.
26.
Ganschow, L., Philips, L., & Schneider, E. (2001). Closing the gap: Accommodating students with language learning disabilities in college. Topics in Language Disorders , 21, 17—37.
27.
Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1986). Learning disabilities and foreign language difficulties: Deficit in listening skills?Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities International, 2, 306—319.
28.
Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1987). The foreign language requirement. Learning DisabilitiesFocus, 2, 115—123.
29.
Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1993). Foreign language learning disabilities: Issues, research and teaching implications. In S. Vogel & P. Adelman (Eds.), Success for college students with learning disabilities (pp. 283—320). New York: Springer.
30.
Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (1995). Effects of direct instruction in Spanish phonology on the native language skills and foreign language aptitude of at-risk foreign language learners. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 109—120.
31.
Ganschow, L., & Sparks, R. (2001). Learning difficulties and foreign language learning: A review of research and instruction. Language Teaching, 34, 79—98.
32.
Ganschow, L., Sparks, R., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., & Bishop-Marbury, A. (1991). Identifying native language difficulties among foreign language learners in college: A “foreign” language learning disability?Journal of Learning Disabilities , 24, 530—541.
33.
Gardner, R. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Arnold.
34.
Gardner, R., & Lambert, W. (1965). Language aptitude, intelligence, and second language achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 191—199.
35.
Gardner, R., & Lambert W. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
36.
Gordon, M., & Keiser, S. (Eds.). (1998). Accommodations in higher education under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): A no nonsense guide for clinicians, educators, administrators, and lawyers. New York: Guilford Press.
37.
Gordon, M., Lewandowski, L., & Keiser, S. (1999). The LD label for relatively well-functioning students: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 485—490.
38.
Grigorenko, E. (2002). Foreign language acquisition and language-based learning disabilities. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 95—112). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
39.
Hessler, G. (1987). Educational issues surrounding severe discrepancy . Learning Disabilities Research, 3, 43-49.
40.
Horwitz, E., Horwitz, M., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70, 125—132.
41.
Hu, C. (2003). Phonological memory, phonological awareness, and foreign language word learning. Language Learning, 53, 429—462.
42.
Hulstijn, J., & Bossers, B. (1992). Individual differences in L2 proficiency as a function of L1 proficiency. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 341—353.
43.
Humes-Bartlo, M. (1989). Variation in children's ability to learn second languages. In K. Hyltenstam & L. Obler (Eds.), Bilingualism across the life span (pp. 41—54). New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Kavale K. (1993). How many learning disabilities are there? A commentary on Stanovich's “Dysrationalia: A New Specific Learning Disability.” Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 520—523, 567.
45.
Kavale, K. (1998). The politics of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21, 245—273.
46.
Kavale, K., & Forness, S. (2000a). History, rhetoric, and reality: Analysis of the inclusion debate. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 279—296.
47.
Kavale, K., & Forness, S. (2000b). What definitions of learning disability say and don't say: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 33, 239—256.
48.
Keeney, L., & Smith, N. (1984). Foreign language modifications for disabled students—The campus response. Association of Handicapped Student Service Programs in Postsecondary Education (AHSSPPE Bulletin), 2, 4—5.
49.
Levine, M. (1987). Developmental variation and learning disorders . Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing .
50.
Linn, R., Graue, E., & Sanders, N. (1990). Comparing state and district test results to national norms: The validity of claims that “everyone is above average.” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9, 5—14.
51.
Lyon, R., Fletcher, J., Shaywitz, S., Shaywitz, B., Torgesen J., Ward, F., et al. (2001). Rethinking learning disabilities. In C. Finn, A. Rotherham, & C. Hokanson (Eds.), Rethinking special education for a new century (pp. 259—287). Washington, DC: Thomas Fordham Foundation.
52.
Mabbott, A. (1994). An exploration of reading comprehension, oral reading errors, and written errors by subjects labeled learning disabled. Foreign Language Annals, 27, 293—324.
53.
MacMillan D., Gresham, F., & Bocian, K. (1998). Discrepancy between definitions of learning disabilities and school practices: An empirical investigation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 314—326.
54.
Mercer, C., Jordan, L., Allsop, D., & Mercer, A. (1996). Learning disabilities definitions and criterion used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly , 19, 217—232.
55.
Moats, L., & Lyon, R. (1993). Learning disabilities in the United States: Advocacy, science, and the future of the field. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 282—294.
56.
Olshtain, E., Shohamy, E., Kemp, J., & Chatow, R. (1990). Factors predicting success in EFL among culturally different learners. Language Learning, 40, 23—44.
57.
Pimsleur, P. (1966a). Testing foreign language learning. In A. Valdman (Ed.), Trends in language teaching (pp. 175—214). New York: McGraw-Hill .
58.
Pimsleur, P. (1966b, 2000). The Pimsleur language aptitude battery. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. (Republished by Second Language Testing, Inc., www.2lti.com)
59.
Pimsleur, P. (1968). Language aptitude testing. In A. Davies (Ed.), Language testing symposium: A psycholinguistic approach (pp. 98—106). London: Oxford University Press.
60.
Pompian, N., & Thum, C. (1988). Dyslexic/ learning disabled students at Dartmouth . Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 278—284.
61.
Reed, D., & Stansfield, C. (2004). Using the Modern Language Aptitude Test to identify a foreign language learning disability: Is it ethical?Language Assessment Quarterly, 1, 161—176.
62.
Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J., (2004). Assessment in special and inclusive education (9th ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin.
63.
Sasaki, M. (1996). Second language proficiency, foreign language aptitude and intelligence. New York: Lang.
64.
Second Language Testing Institute. (n.d.). Question 5. Retrieved May 3, 2005, from http://www.2lti.com/htm/mlat/htm
65.
Shaw, R. (1999). The case for course substitutions as a reasonable accommodation for students with foreign language learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 320—328.
66.
Shaywitz, S. (2003). Overcoming dyslexia. New York : Knopf.
67.
Siegel, L. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 469—478, 486.
68.
Siegel, L. (2003). IQ-discrepancy definitions and the diagnosis of LD: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 2—3.
69.
Skehan, P. (1986). The role of foreign language aptitude in a model of school learning. Language Testing, 3, 188—221.
70.
Skehan, P. (1991). Individual differences in second language learning . Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 275—298.
71.
Skehan, P. (2002). Theorizing and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69—93). Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
72.
Smith, S. (2002). Considerations in the development of foreign language substitution policies at the postsecondary level for students with learning disabilities. Association of Department of Foreign Languages (ADFL)Bulletin, 33, 61—67.
73.
Sparks, R. (1995). Examining the linguistic coding differences hypothesis to explain individual differences in foreign language learning. Annals of Dyslexia, 45, 187—214.
74.
Sparks, R. (2001). Foreign language learning problems of students classified as learning disabled and non-learning disabled: Is there a difference?Topics in Language Disorders, 21, 38—54.
75.
Sparks, R. (2005). Intelligence, learning disabilities, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and foreign language learning: A research update. Association of Department of Foreign Languages (ADFL)Bulletin, 36, 43—50
76.
Sparks, R., Artzer, M., Javorsky, J., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., Miller, K., et al. (1998). Students classified as learning disabled (LD) and non-learning disabled students: Two comparison studies of native language skill, foreign language aptitude, and foreign language proficiency . Foreign Language Annals, 31, 535—551.
77.
Sparks, R., Artzer, M., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., Miller, K., Hordubay, D., et al. (1998). Benefits of multisensory language instruction in Spanish for at-risk learners: A comparison study of high school Spanish students. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 239—270.
78.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1991). Foreign language learning difficulties: Affective or native language aptitude differences?Modern Language Journal , 75, 3—16.
79.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1993b). The effects of a multisensory structured language approach on the native and foreign language aptitude skills of at-risk learners: A replication and follow-up study. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 194—216.
80.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1993a). Searching for the cognitive locus of foreign language learning problems: Linking first and second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 77, 289—302.
81.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1995a). Parent perceptions in the screening for performance in foreign language courses. Foreign Language Annals, 28, 371—391.
82.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1995b). A strong inference approach to causal factors in foreign language learning: A response to MacIntyre. Modern Language Journal, 79, 235—244.
83.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (1996). Teachers' perceptions of students' foreign language academic skills and affective characteristics. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 172—185.
84.
Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (2001). Aptitude for learning a foreign language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 90—111.
85.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Artzer, M., Siebenhar, D., & Plageman, M. (1998). Differences in native language skills, foreign language aptitude, and foreign language grades among high, average, and low proficiency learners: Two studies. Language Testing, 15, 181—216.
86.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Fluharty, K., & Little, S. (1996). An exploratory study of the effects of Latin on the native language skills and foreign language aptitude of students with and without learning disabilities. Classical Journal, 91, 165—184.
87.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., & Javorsky, J. (1993). Perceptions of high and low-risk students and students with learning disabilities about high school foreign language courses . Foreign Language Annals, 26, 491—510.
88.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., & Patton, J. (1992a). Identifying native language deficits in high-and low- risk foreign language learners in high school. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 403—418.
89.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Javorsky, J., Pohlman, J., & Patton, J. (1992b). Test comparisons among students identified as high-risk, low-risk, and learning disabled in high school foreign language courses. Modern Language Journal, 76, 142—159.
90.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Kenneweg, S., & Miller, K. (1991). Use of anOrton- Gillingham approach to teach a foreign language to dyslexic/learning disabled students: Explicit teaching of phonology in a second language. Annals of Dyslexia, 41, 96—118.
91.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., & Pohlman, J. (1989). Linguistic coding deficits in foreign language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 39, 179—195.
92.
Sparks, R., Ganschow, L., Pohlman, J., Artzer, M., & Skinner, S. (1992). The effects of a multisensory, structured language approach on the native and foreign language aptitude skills of high risk, foreign language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 42, 25—53.
93.
Sparks, R., Humbach, N., & Javorsky, J. (2005). Comparing low and high risk, LD and ADHD foreign language learners: Longitudinal evidence for connections between native language and foreign language learning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
94.
Sparks, R., & Javorsky, J. (1999a). Section 504 and the Americans with Disabilities Act: Accommodating the learning disabled student in the foreign language curriculum: An update. Association of Departments of Foreign Language (ADFL)Bulletin, 30, 36—44.
95.
Sparks, R., & Javorsky, J. (1999b). Students classified as learning disabled and the college foreign language requirement: Replication and comparison studies . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 32—349
96.
Sparks, R., Javorsky, J., & Ganschow, L. (2005). Should the Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT) be used to determine course substitutions for and waivers of the foreign language requirement?Foreign Language Annals, 38, 201—210.
97.
Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., Humbach, N., & Javorsky, J. (2006). Native language predictors of foreign language proficiency and foreign language aptitude. Annals of Dyslexia , 56, 129—160.
98.
Sparks, R., Philips, L., & Ganschow, L. (1996). Students classified as learning disabled and the college foreign language requirement. In J. Liskin-Gasparro (Ed.), Patterns and policies: The changing demo-graphics of foreign language instruction (pp. 123—159). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
99.
Sparks, R., Philips, L., Ganschow, L., & Javorsky, J. (1999a). Comparison of students classified as learning disabled who petitioned for or fulfilled the college foreign language requirement . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 553—566.
100.
Sparks, R., Philips, L., Ganschow, L., & Javorsky, J. (1999b). Students classified as learning disabled and the college foreign language requirement: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 566—580.
101.
Sparks, R., Philips, L., & Javorsky, J. (2002). Students classified as LD who received course substitutions for the college foreign language requirement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 482—499, 538.
102.
Sparks, R., Philips, L., & Javorsky, J. (2003). Students classified as LD who petitioned for or fulfilled the foreign language requirement—Are they different? A replication study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 348—362.
103.
Sparks, R., Schneider, E., & Ganschow, L. (2002). Teaching foreign (second) languages to at-risk learners. In J. Hammadou Sullivan (Ed.), Literacy and the second language learner (pp. 55—83). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
104.
Stanovich, K. (1988). The right and wrong places to look for the cognitive locus of reading disability. Annals of Dyslexia, 38, 154—177.
105.
Stanovich, K. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray?Reading Research Quarterly , 26, 7—29.
106.
Stanovich, K. (1993). Dysrationalia: A new specific learning disability . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 501—515.
107.
Stanovich, K. (1994). Annotation: Does dyslexia exist?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 579—595.
108.
Stanovich, K. (1999). The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 350—361.
109.
Vellutino, F., Fletcher, J., Snowling, M., & Scanlon, D. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2—40.
110.
Vellutino, F., Scanlon, D., & Lyon, R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-toremediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ— achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 223—238.
111.
Wesche, M. (1981). Language aptitude measures in streaming, matching students with methods, and diagnosis of learning problems. In K. Diller (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 119—139). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
112.
Wolinsky, S., & Whelan, A. (1994). Federal law and the accommodation of students with LD: The lawyer's look at the BU decision. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 286—291.
