The primary purpose of this study was to identify student characteristics that reliably predict responsiveness and nonresponsiveness to generally effective early literacy interventions. Participants were 104 children, including 7 with special needs and Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), who were tested in kindergarten and first grade. Responsiveness/nonresponsiveness status was determined after 2 years during which children participated in best practice instruction (a) in kindergarten and first grade, (b) in kindergarten only, (c) in first grade only, or (d) in neither year. This facilitated the study of three groups. Always responsive students met responsiveness criteria in both years. Sometimes responsive students met the criteria in only one year. Nonresponsive students did not meet the criteria in either year. Multivariate analysis of variance and discriminant function analysis indicated that the three groups were reliably different from one another on measures of problem behavior, verbal memory, sentence imitation, syntactic awareness, vocabulary, naming speed, and segmentation. A combination of naming speed, vocabulary, sentence imitation, problem behavior, and amount of intervention correctly predicted 82.1% of nonresponsive students, 30.0% of sometimes responsive students, and 84.1% of always responsive students. Fifty students from kindergarten and first grade were tested again at the end of what should have been their third-grade year. All but 1 of the nonresponsive students who received intervention had been identified as requiring special education and had an IEP with reading goals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achenbach, T.M. (1994). Child behavior checklist. Burlington, VT: University Medical Education Associates .
2.
Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cam-bridge, MA: MIT Press .
3.
Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 300—316.
4.
Berninger, V.W., Abbott, R.D., Zook, D., Ogier, S., Lemos-Britton, Z., & Brooksher, R. (1999). Early intervention for reading disabilities: Teaching the alphabetic principle in a connectionist framework. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 491—503.
5.
Blachman, B.A. (1994). What we have learned from longitudinal studies of phonological processing and reading, and some unanswered questions: A response to Torgesen, Wagner, and Rashotte. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 27, 287— 291.
6.
Blachman, B. (1997). Early intervention and phonological awareness: A cautionary tale. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia (pp. 408— 430). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Brown, I.S., & Felton, R.H. (1990). Effects of instruction on beginning reading skills in children at risk for reading disability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 223—241.
8.
Case, L.P., Speece, D.L., & Molloy, D.E. (2003). The validity of a response-to-instruction paradigm to identify reading disabilities: A longitudinal analysis of individual differences and contextual factors. School Psychology Review32(4), 447— 582.
9.
Catts, H.W., Fey, M.E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J.B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 331—361.
10.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37—46.
11.
Dickman, E.G., Hennessy, N.L., Moats, L.C., Rooney, K.J., & Tomey, H.A. (2002). The International Dyslexia Association response to OSEP Summit on Learning Disabilities. Unpublished paper.
12.
Donovan, M.S., & Cross, C.T. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
13.
Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test—Revised . Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
14.
Farr, R.C., & Strickland, D.S. (1995). Treasury of literature: First street. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
15.
Fletcher, J.M., & Foorman, B.R. (1994). Issues in definition and measurement of learning disabilities: The need for early intervention. In G. R. Lyon (Ed.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues (pp. 185—200). Baltimore: Brookes.
16.
Fletcher, J.M., Lyon, G.R., Barnes, M., Stuebing, K., Francis, D.J., Olson, R.K., et al. (2002). Classification of learning disabilities: An evidence-based evaluation. In R. Bradley , L. Danielson, & D. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities (pp. 185—250). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
Fletcher, J.M., Morris, R.D., & Lyon, G.R. (2003). Classification and definition of learning disabilities: An integrative perspective. In H. L. Swanson , K. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 30—56). New York: Guilford Press.
18.
Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Winikates, D., Mehta, P., Schatschneider, C., & Fletcher, J.M. (1997). Early interventions for children with disabilities. Scientific Studies of Reading , 1, 255—276.
19.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (1986). Test procedure bias: A meta-analysis of examiner familiarity effects. Review of Educational Research, 56, 243—262.
20.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Mathes, P.G., & Lipsey, M.L. (2002). Is “learning disabilities” just a fancy term for low achievement? A meta-analysis of reading differences between low achievers with and without the label. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson, & D. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities (pp. 737—762). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Power, M.H., & Dailey, A.M. (1985). Bias in the assessment of handicapped children . American Educational Research Journal, 22, 185—198.
22.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Svenson, E., Yen, L., Thompson, A., McMaster, K., et al. (2001). Peer Assisted Learning Strategies: First grade reading. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
23.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., McMaster, K., et al. (2001). Peer Assisted Learning Strategies: Kindergarten reading. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
24.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., Yang, N., et al. (2001). Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 251—267.
25.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., Yang, N., et al. (2002). Exploring the importance of reading programs for kindergartners with disabilities in mainstream classrooms. Exceptional Children, 68, 295—311.
26.
Fuchs, D., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., Svenson, E., Braun, M., & Yang, N. (2000, February). Exploring effective and efficient reading readiness programs in Title I and non-Title I schools. Paper presented at the annual Pacific Coast Research Conference, La Jolla, CA.
27.
Fuchs, D., & Young, C. (2006). On the irrelevance of intelligence in predicting responsiveness to reading instruction. Exceptional Children , 73, 8—30.
28.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 204—219.
29.
Fuchs, L.S., Deno, S.L., & Marston, D. (1983). Improving the reliability of curriculum-based measures of academic skills for psychoeducational decision making. Diagnostique, 6, 135—149.
30.
Good, R.H., Simmons, D.C., & Kame'enui, E.J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257— 288.
31.
Good, R.H., Simmons, D.C., & Smith, A. (1999). Effective academic interventions in the United States: Evaluating and enhancing the acquisition of early reading skills. Educational and Child Psychology, 15, 56—70.
32.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (2005). Improving the writing performance of young struggling writers: Theoretical and programmatic research from the Center on Accelerating Student Learning. Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 19—33.
33.
Grimes, J. (2002, August). Responsiveness to interventions: The next step in special education identification, service, and exiting decision making . Paper presented at OSEP's Learning Disabilities Summit conference, Washington, DC.
34.
Hammill, D.D. (1991). Detroit tests of learning aptitude (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
35.
Hammill, D.D., & Newcomer, P.L. (1988). Test of language development: 2—Primary. Austin, TX: PRO-ED .
36.
Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego: Academic Press.
37.
Huberty, C.J. (1994). Applied discriminant analysis. New York: Wiley.
38.
Hurford, D.P. (1990). Training phonemic segmentation ability with a phonemic discrimination intervention in second-and third-grade children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 564—569.
39.
Jenkins, J.R., Fuchs, L.S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S.L. (2003). Accuracy and fluency in list and context reading of skilled and RD groups: Absolute and relative performance levels. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 237—245.
40.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437—447.
41.
Juel, C. (1994). At-risk university students tutoring at-risk elementary school children: What factors make it effective? In E. H. Hiebert & B. M. Taylor (Eds.), Getting reading right from the start: Effective early interventions (pp. 39—62). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
42.
Kame'enui, E. (2002). Final report: An analysis of reading assessment instruments for K—3 . Retrieved December 5, 2003, from the Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement, University of Oregon, at http://idea.uoregon.edu/assessment/index.html
43.
Kaminski, R.R., & Good, R.H. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215—227.
44.
Kauffman, J.E., Cullinan, D., & Epstein, M.H. (1987). Characteristics of students placed in special programs for the seriously emotionally disturbed. Behavioral Disorders, 12, 175—184.
45.
Kennedy, M.M., Birman, M., & Demaline, B. (1986). The effectiveness of Chapter 1 services. Second interim report from the National Assessment of Chapter 1. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
46.
Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159—174.
47.
Lonigan, C.J., Burgess, S.R., & Anthony, J.L. (2000). Development of emergent literacy and early reading skills in preschool children: Evidence from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 36, 596—613.
48.
Levy, B.A., & Lysynchuk, L. (1997). Beginning word recognition: Benefits of training by segmentation and whole word methods. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 359—387.
49.
Lyon, G.R. (1985). Identification and remediation of learning disability subtypes: Preliminary findings. Learning DisabilityFocus , 1, 21—35.
Mathes, P.G., & Fuchs, L. (1994). The efficacy of peer tutoring in reading for students with mild disabilities: A best-evidence synthesis. School Psychology Review, 23, 59—80.
52.
Mathes, P.G., Howard, J.K., Allen, S.H., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Peer-assisted learning strategies for first grade readers: Responding to the needs of diverse learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 62—94.
53.
McMaster, K.L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S. & Compton, D.L. (2005). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71, 445—463.
54.
National Association of School Psychologists. ( 2002). Draft: NASP recommendations on LD eligibility and identification for IDEA reauthorization. Unpublished paper.
55.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction . Washington, DC: National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development.
56.
Nelson, R.J., Benner, G.J., & Gonzalez, J. (2003). Learner characteristics that influence the treatment effectiveness of early literacy interventions: A meta-analytic review. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 255—267.
57.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, H.R. 1.
58.
O'Connor, R.E. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 15, 43—54.
59.
O'Connor, R.E., Jenkins, J., Leicester, N., & Slocum, T. (1993). Teaching phonological awareness to young children with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 59, 532—546.
60.
O'Connor, R.E., Jenkins, J., & Slocum, T. (1995). Transfer among phonological tasks in kindergarten: Essential instructional content. Journal of Educational Psychology , 87, 202—217.
61.
O'Connor, R.E., Notari-Syverson, A., & Vadasy, P.F. (1996). Ladders to literacy: The effects of teacher-led phonological activities for kindergarten children with and without disabilities . Exceptional Children, 63, 117—130.
62.
O'Connor, R.E., Notari-Syverson, A., & Vadasy, P.F. (1998). Ladders to Literacy: A kindergarten activity book . Baltimore: Brookes.
63.
O'Shaugnessy, T.E., & Swanson, H.L. (2000). A comparison of two reading interventions for children with reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 33, 257—277.
64.
Pedhazur, E.J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanations and prediction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
65.
Pennington, B. (2004, April 8). Comorbidities of dyslexia, ADHD, and speech—language disorders. Paper presented at the John F. Kennedy Center for Research on Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
66.
President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education. (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: Author.
67.
Scarborough, H.S. (2002). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97—110). New York: Guilford Press.
68.
Schneider, W., Ennemoser, M., Roth, E., & Kuspert, P. (1999). Kindergarten prevention of dyslexia: Does training in phonological awareness work for everybody?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 429—436.
69.
Shanahan, T., & Barr, R. (1995). Reading Recovery: An independent evaluation of the effects of an early intervention for at-risk learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 958—996.
70.
Smith-Burke, M.T., & Jaggar, A.M. (1994). Implementing Reading Recovery in New York: Insights from the first two years. In E. H. Hiebert & B. M. Taylor (Eds.), Getting reading right from the start: Effective early interventions (pp. 63—84). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
71.
Snider, V.E. (1997). Transfer of decoding skills to a literature basal . Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 1, 54—62.
72.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
73.
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360— 407.
74.
Stein, M., Johnson, B., & Gutlohn, L. (1999). Analyzing beginning reading programs: The relationship between decoding instruction and text. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 275—287.
75.
Stevens, J. (1986). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
76.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins.
77.
Tabors, P.O., Snow, C.E., & Dickinson, D.K. (2001). Homes and schools together supporting language and literacy development. In D. K. Dickinson & P. O. Tabors (Eds.), Beginning literacy with language (pp. 289—339). Baltimore: Brookes.
78.
Torgesen, J. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55—64.
79.
Torgesen, J.K., & Davis, C. (1996). Individual difference variables that predict response to training in phonological awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 1—21.
80.
Torgesen, J.K., Morgan, S., & Davis, C. (1992). The effects of two types of phonological awareness training on word learning in kindergarten children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 364—370.
81.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Lindamood, P., Rose, E., Conway, T., et al. (1999). Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 579—593.
82.
Uhry, J.K., & Shepherd, M. (1997). Teaching phonological recoding to young children with phonological processing deficits: The effect on sight word acquisition . Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 104—125.
83.
Vadasy, P.F., Jenkins, J.R., Antil, L.R., Wayne, S.K., & O'Connor, R.E. (1997). Community-based early reading intervention for at-risk first graders. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 12, 29—39.
84.
Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L.S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137—146.
85.
Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hick-man, P. (2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children , 69, 391—409.
86.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Lyon, G.R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 33, 223—238.
87.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., Small, S., Chen, R., Pratt, A., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-toremediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601—638.
88.
Wolf, M., & Bowers, P.G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415—438.
89.
Yopp, H.K. (1995). A test for assessing phonemic awareness in young children. ReadingTeacher, 49(1), 20—29.
