Two studies of second graders at risk for reading disability, which were guided by levels of language and functional reading system theory, focused on reading comprehension in this population. In Study 1 (n = 96), confirmatory factor analysis of five comprehension measures loaded on one factor in both fall and spring of second grade. Phonological decoding predicted accuracy of real-word reading; automatic letter naming predicted rate of real-word reading; accuracy and rate of both real-word reading (more so than decoding of pseudowords) and text reading predicted reading comprehension; and Verbal IQ also predicted reading comprehension. In Study 2 (n = 98), the treatment group (before/after school clubs receiving an integrated instructional approach that was supplementary to the general reading program) improved significantly more in phonological decoding and state standards for reading fluency than the control group (general reading program that had some code instruction but emphasized comprehension). The rate of phonological decoding explained 60.3% of real-word reading. Both treatment and control children improved significantly in reading comprehension, but controlling for pretreatment individual differences in oral vocabulary or in phonological decoding eliminated this effect. Taken together, the results of the two studies support two paths to reading comprehension: one from vocabulary and verbal reasoning, and one from written language that has multiple links between subskills: (a) alphabetic principle → phonological decoding, (b) automatic phonological decoding → accurate real-word reading, (c) automatic letter coding → automatic word reading, and (d) automatic word reading → fluent text reading. Instructional implications of both paths and the links within the written language are discussed.
Bentler, P., & Wu , E. (2000). EQS program. Los Angeles: Multivariate Software.
3.
Berninger, V. (2001). Process assessment of the learner (PAL) test of reading and writing. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
4.
Berninger, V., Abbott, R., & Alsdorf, B. (1997). Lexical- and sentence-level processes in comprehension of written sentences. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 135—162.
5.
Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Billingsley, F., & Nagy, W. (2001). Processes underlying timing and fluency: Efficiency, automaticity, coordination, and morphological awareness. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain (pp. 383—414). Baltimore: York Press.
6.
Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Vermeulen, K., Ogier, S., Brooksher, R., Zook, D., et al. (2002). Comparison of faster and slower responders: Implications for the nature and duration of early reading intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 59— 76.
7.
Berninger, V., & O'Donnell, L. (2004). Research-supported differential diagnosis of specific learning disabilities. In A. Prifitera, D. Saklofske, L. Weiss , & E. Rolfhus (Eds.), WISC-IV Clinical use and interpretation (pp. 189—233). San Diego : Academic Press.
8.
Berninger, V., & Richards, T. (2002). Brain literacy for educators and psychologists . San Diego: Academic Press/ Elsevier.
9.
Berninger, V., Vermeulen, K., Abbott, R., McCutchen, D., Cotton, S., Cude, J., et al. (2003). Comparison of three approaches to supplementary reading instruction for low achieving second grade readers. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 101—115.
10.
Biemiller, A. (1977—1978). Relationship between oral reading rates for letters, words, and simple text in the development of reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 13, 223—253.
11.
Biemiller, A., & Siegel, L. (1997). A longitudinal study of the effects of the Bridge Reading Program for children at-risk for reading failure. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 83—92.
12.
Breznitz, Z. (1997a). Enhancing the reading of dyslexics by reading acceleration and auditory masking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 103—113.
13.
Breznitz, Z. (1997b). The effect of accelerated reading rate on memory for text among dyslexic readers. Journal of Educational Psychology , 89, 287—299.
14.
Carlisle, J., & Rice, M. (2002). Improving reading comprehension. Research-based principles and practices. Timonium, MD: York Press.
15.
Cooper, J., Pikulski, J., & Au, K. (1996). Early success. An intervention program (Level 2). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
16.
Dowhower, S. (1987). Effects of repeated reading on second-grade transitional readers' fluency and comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly , 22, 389—406.
17.
Ehri, L., Nunes, S., Stahl, S., & Willows, D. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393—447.
18.
Englert, C., Tarrant, K., Mariage, T., & Over, T. (1994). Lesson talk as the work of reading groups: The effectiveness of two interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 27, 165—185.
19.
Foorman, B., Francis, D., Fletcher, J., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 1—15.
20.
Garvey, C. (1990). Play (Developing Child Series). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
Geisel, T.S. (Dr. Seuss). (1950). If I ran the zoo. New York: Random House.
22.
Gough, P., & Hillinger, M. (1980). Learning to read: An unnatural act. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 30, 179—196.
23.
Henry, M. (2003). Unlocking literacy: Effective decoding and spelling instruction. Baltimore: Brookes .
24.
Jenkins, J., Fuchs, L., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 719—729.
25.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437—447.
26.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension. A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Kuhn, M., & Stahl, S. (2000, March). Fluency. A review of developmental and remedial practices (CIERA Report # 2-008). Athens: University of Georgia, Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement .
28.
Kuhn, M., & Stahl, S. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3—21.
29.
Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (1990). Qualitative reading inventory. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman/ Little, Brown.
30.
Levy, B., Abello, B., & Lysynchuk, L. (1997). Transfer from word training to reading in context: Gains in reading fluency and comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 173—188.
31.
MacGinitie, W., & MacGinitie, R. (1989). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
32.
Mahoney, D., & Mann, V. (1992). Using children's humor to clarify the relationship between linguistic awareness and early reading ability. Cognition , 45, 163—186.
33.
Nagy, W. (in press). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary—comprehension connection. In R. K. Wagner, A. Muse, & K. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Vocabulary acquisition and its implications for reading comprehension. New York: Guilford.
34.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction . Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
35.
Oakhill, J., & Yull, N. (1996). Higher order factors in comprehension disability: Processes and remediation. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakland (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 69—92). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36.
Perfetti, C. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
Pressley, M., & Wharton-MacDonald, R. (1997). Skilled comprehension and its development through instruction. School Psychology Review, 26, 448—466.
38.
Psychological Corp. (1991). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Author.
39.
Psychological Corp. (1992). Wechsler individual achievement test . San Antonio, TX: Author.
40.
Rasinski, T., Padak, N., Linek, W., & Sturtevant, E. (1994). Effects of fluency development on urban second-grade readers. The Journal of Educational Research, 87, 158—165.
41.
Reutzel, D., & Hollingsworth, P. (1993). Effects of fluency training on second graders' reading comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 86, 325—331.
42.
Samuels, S. (1985). Automaticity and repeated reading. In J. Osborn , P. Wilson, & R. Andeson (Eds.), Reading education: Foundations for a literate America (pp. 215— 230). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
43.
Stahl, S., Heubach, K., & Crammond, B. (1997, Winter). Fluency-oriented reading instruction (Reading Research Report No. 79). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center Project of the University of Georgia and University of Maryland .
44.
Stahl, S., & Nagy, W. (2005). Teaching word meaning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45.
Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360— 407.
46.
Swanson, H.L., & Berninger, V. (1995). The role of working memory in learning disabled readers' comprehension. Intelligence, 21, 83—108.
47.
Tan, A., & Nicholson, T. (1997). Flashcards revisited: Training poor readers to read words faster improves their comprehension of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 276—288.
48.
Torgesen, J., Wagner, R., & Rashotte, C. (1997). Prevention and remediation of severe reading disabilities . Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 217—234.
49.
Torgesen, J., Wagner, R., & Rashotte, C. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
50.
Uhry, J., & Shepherd, M. (1997). Teaching phonological recoding to young children with phonological processing deficits: The effect on sight-vocabulary acquisition . Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 104—125.
51.
Vellutino, F., Scanlon, D., Sipay, E., Small, S., Pratt, A., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601—638.
52.
Wagner, R. K., Muse, A., & Tannenbaum, K. (Eds.). (in press). Vocabulary acquisition and its implications for reading comprehension. New York: Guilford .
53.
Walczyk, J. (2000). The interplay between automatic and control processes in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 554— 566.
54.
Wiederholt, J., & Bryant, B. (1992). Gray oral reading test (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
55.
Woodcock, R. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
