This study was designed to determine a word problem difficulty classification in children with arithmetic learning disabilities (ALD; n = 104) in comparison with typically achieving students (n = 44). We tested variables such as (a) semantic structure (Change, Combine, Compare, and Equalize), (b) operation (subtraction and addition), and (c) position of the unknown quantity in the problem. Facet theory with multidimensional scaling techniques (MINISSA) was used to analyze the underlying dimensions in the responses of each group of participants. Our results indicate that although the word problem difficulty classifications for the 2 groups of children were different, the position of the unknown quantity had a greater influence on the level of difficulty of story problems than other variables. The noncanonical problems—specifically, those with the unknown term in the first place—although difficult for both groups of children, were the most difficult problems for children with ALD.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baroody, A.J., & Hume, J. (1991). Meaningful mathematics instruction: The case of fractions. Remedial and Special Education, 12(3), 54—68.
2.
Bermejo, V., Lago, M.O., & Rodríguez, P. (1998). Aprendizaje de la adición y sutracción. Secuenciación de los problemas verbales segùn su dificultad [Learning of addition and subtraction. Word problem difficulty classifications]. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 51, 533—552.
3.
Borg, I., & Shye, S. (1995). Facet theory: Form and content. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Briars, D.J., & Larkin, J.H. (1984). An integrated model of skill in solving elementary word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 245—296.
5.
Canter, D. (1983). The potential of facet theory for applied social psychology. Quality & Quantity, 17, 35—67.
6.
Carpenter, T.P. (1985). Learning to add and subtract: An exercise in problem solving. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 17—40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Carpenter, T.P., & Fennema, E. (1992). Representation of addition and subtraction word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 345—357.
8.
Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Peterson, P., Chiang, C.H., & Loef, M. (1989). Using knowledge of children's mathematic thinking in classroom teaching: An experimental study. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 499—531.
9.
Carpenter, T.P., Hiebert, J., & Moser, J.M. (1981). The effect of problem structure on first-graders' initial solution processes for simple addition and subtraction problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12, 27—39.
10.
Carpenter, T.P., & Moser, J.M. (1982). The development of addition and subtraction problem solving-skills. In T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Moser, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 9—24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
Carpenter, T.P., & Moser, J.M. (1983). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts . In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes (pp. 7—44). New York: Academic Press.
12.
Carpenter, T.P., & Moser, J.M. (1984). The acquisition of addition and subtraction concepts in grades one through three. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 179—202.
13.
De Corte, E., Greer, B., & Verschaffel, L. (1996). Mathematic teaching and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 491—549). New York: Macmillan.
14.
Donald, I. (1995): Facet theory: Defining research domains. In G. M. Breackwell, S. Hammond, & C. Fife-Schaw (Eds.), Research methods in psychology (pp. 116—137). London: Sage.
15.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Mathematical problem-solving profiles of students with mathematics disabilities with and without comorbid reading disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 563— 573.
16.
García, A.I., & Jiménez, J.E. (2000). Resolución de problemas verbales aritméticos en niños con dificultades de aprendizaje [Solving arithmetic word problems in children with learning difficulties]. Cognitiva, 12, 153—170.Gibb, E.G. (1956). Children's thinking in the process of subtraction. Journal of Experimental Education , 25, 71—80.
17.
Ginsburg, H.P. (1997). Mathematics learning disabilities: A view from developmental psychology. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 30, 20—33.
18.
Grouws, D.A. (1972). Differential performance of third-grade children in solving open sentences of four types. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin , 1971). Dissertation Abstracts Internacional, 32, 3860A
19.
Jiménez, J.E., & García, A.I. (1999). Is IQ—achievement discrepancy relevant in the definition of arithmetic learning disabilities?Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 291—301.
20.
Jiménez, J.E., & García, A.I. (2002). Strategy choice in solving arithmetic word problems: Are there differences between students with learning disabilities, G-V poor performance and typical achievement students?Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 113—122.
21.
Jitendra, A., & Hoff, K. (1996). The effects of schema-based instruction on the mathematical word problem solving performance of students with learning disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 422—431.
22.
Jitendra, A., Di Pipi, C., & Perron-Jones, N. (2002). An exploratory study of schema-based word problem solving for instruction for middle school students with learning disabilities: A conceptual and procedural understanding. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 23—38.
23.
Jordan, N.C., & Montani, T.O. (1997). Cognitive arithmetic and problem solving: A comparison of children with specific and general mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 624—634, 684.
24.
Judd, T.P., & Bilsky, L.H. (1989). Comprehension and memory in the solution of verbal arithmetic problems by mentally retarded and non-retarded individuals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 541— 546.
25.
Kintsch, W., & Greeno, J.G. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems . Psychological Review, 92, 109— 129.
26.
Lewis, A.B., & Mayer, R.E. (1987). Students miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology , 79, 363—371.
27.
Lindvall, C.M., & Ibarra, C.G. (1980). Incorrect procedures used by primary grade pupils in solving open addition and subtraction sentences. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11, 50—62.
28.
Marshall, S.P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Maza, C.G. (1990). Sumar y restar. El proceso de enseñanza/aprendizaje de la suma y de la resta [To add and to subtract. The instructive/learning process of addition and subtraction]. Madrid: Visor Aprendizaje.
30.
Mercer, C.D., & Miller, P.S. (1992). Teaching students with learning problems to acquire, understand, and apply basic math facts. Remedial and Special Education, 13(3), 19—35, 61.
31.
Miller, P.S., & Mercer, C.D. (1997). Educational aspects of mathematics disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 47—56. Montague, M. (1997a). Cognitive strategy instruction in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 164—177.
32.
Montague, M. (1997b). Student's perception, mathematical problem solving, and learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education , 18, 46—53.
33.
Montague, M., Warger, C., & Morgan, T. (2000). Solve it! Strategy instruction to improve mathematical problem solving. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 15, 110—116.
34.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R.E. (1999). Multimedia-supported metaphors for meaning making in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 215—248.
35.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. ( 1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics . Reston, VA: Author.
36.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. ( 1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston VA: Author.
37.
Parmar, R.S., Cawley, J.F., & Frazita, R.R. (1996). Word problem solving by students with and without mild disabilities. Exceptional Children, 62, 415—429.
38.
Patton, J.R., Cronin, M.E., Bassett, D.S., & Koppel, A.E. (1997). A life skills approach to mathematics instruction: Preparing students with learning disabilities for the real-life math demands of adulthood. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 178— 187.
39.
Riley, M.S. (1981). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh .
40.
Riley, M.S., & Greeno, J.G. (1988). Developmental analysis of understanding language about quantities and solving problems. Cognition and Instruction , 5, 49—101.
41.
Riley, M.S., & Greeno, J.G., & Heller, J.I. (1983). Development of children's problem-solving ability in arithmetic. In H. P. Ginsburg (Ed.), The development of mathematical thinking (pp. 153—196). New York: Academic Press.
42.
Russell, R., & Ginsburg, H. (1984). Cognitive analysis of children's mathematics difficulties . Cognition and Instruction, 1, 217—244.
43.
Tamburino, J.L. (1980). An analysis of the modeling processes used by kindergarten children in solving simple addition and subtraction story problems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh .
44.
Wechsler, D. (1989). Escala de inteligencia Wechsler para niños [Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children: Manual]. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
45.
Yusté, C. (1985). Batería de aptitudes diferenciales y generales (gráficos B y C) [Battery to measure differential and general aptitudes (Forms B and C)]. Madrid: Ciencias de la Educación Preescolar y Especial.
