Through multiple logistic regression modeling, this article explores the relative importance of risk and protective factors associated with learning disabilities (LD). A representative national sample of 6- to 17-year-old students (N = 1,268) was drawn by random stratification and classified by the presence versus absence of LD in reading, spelling, and mathematics according to ability—achievement discrepancies or low achievement levels. The dichotomous classifications were regressed on sets of explanatory variables indicating potential biological, social—environmental, and cognitive factors, problem behavior, and classroom learning behavior. Modeling revealed patterns of high risk for male students and students evincing verbal and nonverbal ability problems and processing speed problems. It was shown that, absent controls for cognitive abilities (such as provided by the ability—achievement discrepancy definition), definitions keyed to low achievement will substantially overidentify ethnic minority and disadvantaged students and will be confounded by significantly higher proportions of students who display oppositional and aggressive behavior problems. Alternatively, good learning behaviors uniformly provide substantial reduction in the risk for LD.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackerman, P.L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 227—257.
2.
Aaron, P.G., Joshi, M., & Williams, K.A. (1999). Not all reading disabilities are alike. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 120—137.
3.
Allison, P.D. (1999). Logistic regression using the SAS system: Theory and application. Cary, NC: SAS Institute .
4.
Barnett, D.W., Bauer, A.M., Ehrhardt, K.E., Lentz, F.E., & Stollar, S.A. (1996). Key-stone targets for changes: Planning for widespread positive consequences. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 95—117.
5.
Blair, C., & Scott, K.G. (2002). Proportion of LD placements associated with low socioeconomic status: Evidence for a gradient?The Journal of Special Education, 36, 14—22.
6.
Boekaerts, M. (1993). Being concerned with well-being and with learning . Educational Psychologist, 28, 149—167.
7.
Brackney, B.E., & Karabenick, S.A. (1995). Psychopathology and academic performance: The role of motivation and learning strategies. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 456—465.
8.
Brewer, V.R., Moore, B.D., & Hiscock, M. (1997). Learning disability subtypes in children with neurofibromatosis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 521—533.
9.
Brown, A.L., & Campione, J.C. (1982). Modifying intelligence or modifying cognitive skills: More than a semantic quibble? In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), How and how much can intelligence be increased? (pp. 215—230). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
10.
Bryan, T. (1989). IQ and learning disabilities: A perspective from research on social factors. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 22, 480—481.
11.
Buchanan, H.H., McDermott, P.A., & Schaefer, B.A. (1998). Agreement among classroom observers of children's stylistic learning behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 355—361.
12.
Canivez, G.L. (2004). Replication of the Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents core syndrome factor structure. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 191—199.
13.
Canivez, G.L., & Bordenkircher, S.E. (2002). Convergent and divergent validity of the Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents and the Preschool and Kindergarten Behavior Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 30—45.
14.
Ceci, S.J. (1990). On intelligence. . . more or less: A bio-ecological treatise on intellectual development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15.
Ceci, S.J. (1991). How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components? A reassessment of the evidence. Developmental Psychology, 27, 703—722.
16.
Colarusso, R.P., Keel, M.C., & Dangel, H.L. (2001). A comparison of eligibility criteria and their impact on minority representation in LD programs. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 16, 1—7.
17.
Costello, E.J., & Angold, A. (1993). Toward a developmental epidemiology of the disruptive behavior disorders. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 91—101.
18.
Culbertson, J.L. (1998). Learning disabilities. In T. H. Ollendick & M. Hersen (Eds.), Handbook of child psychopathology (pp. 117—156). New York: Plenum Press.
19.
Culbertson, J.L., & Edmonds, J.E. (1996). Learning disabilities. In R. L. Adams, O. A. Parsons, J. L. Culbertson, & S. J. Nixon (Eds.), Neuropsychology for clinical practice: Etiology, assessment, and treatment of common neurological disorders (pp. 331— 408). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20.
Daley, C.E., & Nagle, R.J. (1996). Relevance of WISC-III indicators for assessment of learning disabilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment , 14, 320—333.
21.
Davis, J.T., Parr, G., & Lan, W. (1997). Differences between learning disability subtypes classified using the Revised Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 346—352.
22.
Deshler, D.D., Ellis, E.S., & Lenz, B.K. (1996). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods (2nd ed.). Denver: Love.
23.
Dombrowski, S.C., Kamphaus, R.W., & Reynolds, C.R. (2004). After the demise of the discrepancy: Proposed learning disabilities diagnostic criteria. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 35, 364—372.
24.
Doris, J.L. (1993). Defining learning disabilities: A history of the search for consensus. In G. R. Lyon & D. B. Gray (Eds.), Better understanding learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policies (pp. 97—115). Baltimore : Brookes.
25.
Drummond, R.J. (2004). Appraisal procedures for counselors and helping professionals (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
26.
Elliot, C.D. (1990). Differential Ability Scales: Introductory and technical handbook. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
27.
Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C., & Strahan, E.J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272—299.
28.
Fantuzzo, J.W., Gadsden, V., McDermott, P.A., Frye, D.A., & Culhane, D. (2003). Evidence-based program for the integration of curricula (EPIC): A comprehensive initiative for low-income preschool children (School Readiness Grant No. R01HD46168-01). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development .
29.
Farrington, D.P. (1986). The sociocultural context of childhood disorders . In H. C. Quay & J. S. Werry (Eds.), Psychopathological disorders of childhood (3rd ed., pp. 391— 422). New York: Wiley.
30.
Fletcher, J.M., Francis, D.J., Shaywitz, S.E., Lyon, G.R., Foorman, B.R., Stuebing, K.K., et al. (1998). Intelligent testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 186—203.
31.
Fletcher, J.M., Morris, R.D., & Lyon, G.R. (2003). Classification and definition of learning disabilities: An integrative perspective. In H. L. Swanson , K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 30—56). New York: Guilford .
32.
Furlong, M.J., & Morrison, G.M. (1994). Introduction to miniseries: School violence and safety in perspective. School Psychology Review, 23, 139—150.
33.
Gallico, R., & Lewis, M.E.B. (1992). Learning disabilities. In M. L. Batshaw & Y. M. Perret (Eds.), Children with disabilities: A medical primer (3rd ed., pp. 365—386). Baltimore: Brookes.
34.
Gettinger, M., & Koscik, R. (2001). Psychological services for children with disabilities . In J. N. Hughes & A. M. LaGreca (Eds.), Handbook of psychological services for children and adolescents (pp. 421—435). New York : Oxford Press.
35.
Glutting, J.J., & McDermott, P.A. (1990). Principles and problems in learning potential. In C. R. Reynolds & R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Intelligence and achievement (pp. 296—347). New York: Guilford.
36.
Glutting, J.J., Snelbaker, A., & McDermott, P.A. (1999). More ups and downs of subtest analysis: Criterion validity of the DAS with an unselected cohort. School Psychology Review, 27, 597—610.
37.
Glutting, J.J., Youngstrom, E.A., Ward, T., Ward, S., & Hale, R. (1997). Incremental efficacy of WISC-III factor scores in predicting achievement: What do they tell us?Psychological Assessment, 9, 295—301.
38.
Gregg, N., & Scott, S.S. (2000). Definition and documentation: Theory, measurement, and the courts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 5—13.
39.
Greenway, P., & Milne, L. (1999). Relationship between psychopathology, learning disabilities, or both and WISC-III subtest scatter in adolescents. Psychology in the Schools, 36, 103—108.
40.
Gresham, F.M., & Witt, J.C. (1997). Utility of intelligence tests for treatment planning, classification, and placement decisions: Recent empirical findings and future directions. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 249—267.
41.
Grim, S.M., Tighe, E.A., & McDermott, P.A. (2001, April). Risk and protective factors for school psychopathology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
42.
Heath, C.P., & Kush, J.C. (1991). Use of discrepancy formulas in the assessment of learning disabilities. In J. E. Obrzut & G. W. Hynd (Eds.), Neuropsychological foundations of learning disabilities (pp. 287— 307). San Diego: Academic Press.
43.
Hinshaw, S.P. (1992). Externalizing behavior problems and academic underachievement in childhood and adolescence: Causal relationships and underlying mechanisms . Psychological Bulletin,111, 127—155.
44.
Holland, A.M., & McDermott, P.A. (1996). Discovering core profile types in the school-age standardization sample of the Differential Ability Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 14, 131—146.
45.
Horn, W.F., Wagner, A.E., & Ialongo, N. (1989). Sex differences in school-aged children with pervasive attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17, 109—125.
46.
Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
47.
Kagan, S. L., Moore, E., & Bredekamp, S. (Eds.). (1995). Reconsidering children's early development and learning: Toward common views and vocabulary. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel.
48.
Kail, R. (2000). Speed of information processing: Developmental change and links to intelligence. Journal of School Psychology , 38, 51—61.
49.
Kaufman, A.S. (1994). Intelligent testing with the WISC-III. New York: Wiley.
50.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1987). The far side of heterogeneity: A critical analysis of empirical subtyping research in learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 374—382.
51.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (2000). What definitions of learning disability say and don't say: A critical analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 33, 239—256.
52.
Keith, T.Z. (1990). Confirmatory and hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis of the Differential Ability Scales. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 391—405.
53.
Kovaleski, J., & Prasse, D.P. (2004, February). Response to instruction in the identification of learning disabilities: A guide for school teams. Communique , 32(5).
54.
Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C.P. (2000). States of excellence. The American Psychologist, 55, 137—150.
55.
Lyon, G.R. (1996). Learning disabilities. In E. J. Marsh & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Child psychopathology (pp. 390—435). New York : Guilford Press.
56.
MacMillan, D.L., & Siperstein, G.N. (2001, August). Learning disabilities as operationally defined by schools. Paper presented at the Learning DisabilitiesSummit: Building a Foundation for the Future, Washington, DC .
57.
Magnuson, D., Stattin, H., & Dunner, A. (1983). Aggression and criminality in a longitudinal perspective . In K. T. Van Dusen & S. A. Mednick (Eds.), Prospective studies of crime and delinquency (pp. 277— 301). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
58.
Mannuzza, S., Gittelman-Klein, R., Bessler, A., Malloy, P., & LaPadula, M. (1993). Adult outcomes of hyperactive boys: Educational achievement, occupational rank, and psychiatric status. Archives of General Psychiatry,50, 565—576.
59.
Masten, A.S., & Coatsworth, J.D. (1998). The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments: Lessons from research on successful children. The American Psychologist, 53, 205— 220.
60.
McDermott, P.A. (1993). National standardization of uniform multisituational measures of child and adolescent behavior pathology. Psychological Assessment, 5, 413—424.
61.
McDermott, P.A. (1996). A nationwide study of developmental and gender prevalence for psychopathology in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24, 53—66.
62.
McDermott, P.A. (1998). MEG: Megacluster analytic strategy for multistage hierarchical grouping with relocations and replications. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 677—686.
63.
McDermott, P.A. (1999). National scales of differential learning behavior among American children and adolescents. School Psychology Review, 28, 280—291.
McDermott, P.A., Marston, N.C., & Stott, D.H. (1993). Adjustment scales for children and adolescents . Philadelphia: Edumetric and Clinical Science.
66.
McDermott, P.A., Mordell, M., & Stoltzfus, J.C. (2001). The organization of student performance in American schools: Discipline, motivation, verbal and nonverbal learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 65—76.
67.
McDermott, P.A., & Schaefer, B.A. (1996). A demographic survey of rare and common problems among American students. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25, 352—362.
68.
McDermott, P.A., & Spencer, M.B. (1997). Racial and social class prevalence of psychopathology among school-age youth in the United States. Youth & Society , 28, 387—406.
69.
McDermott, P.A., & Watkins, M.W. (1985). Microcomputer systems manual for McDermott Multidimensional Assessment of Children (IBM version). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
70.
McDermott, P.A., Watkins, M.W., Sichel, A.F., Weber, E.M., Keenan, J.T., Holland, A.M., et al. (1995). The accuracy of new national scales for detecting emotional disturbance of children and adolescents. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 337— 354.
71.
McDermott, P.A., & Weiss, R.V. (1995). A normative typology of healthy, subclinical, and clinical behavior styles among children and adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 7, 162—170.
72.
Mercer, C.D., Jordan, L., Allsopp, D.H., & Mercer, A.R. (1996). Learning disabilities definitions and criteria used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly , 19, 217—232.
73.
Moffitt, T.E. (1990). Juvenile delinquency and attention deficit disorder: Boys' developmental trajectories from age 3 to age 15. Child Development, 61, 893—910.
74.
Morris, R.D. (1988). Classifications of learning disabilities: Old problems and new approaches. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 789—794.
75.
Morris, R.D., Stuebing, K.K., Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., Lyon, G.R., Shankweiler, D.P., et al. (1998). Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core. Journal of Educational Psychology , 90, 347—373.
76.
National Center for Learning Disabilities. ( 2002). LD basics and fast facts. Retrieved June 3, 2002, from http://www.ncld.org/info/index.cfm
77.
National Education Goals Panel. (1997). Getting a good start in school. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
78.
Oakland, T., Broom, J., & Glutting, J. (2000). Use of freedom from distractibility and processing speed to assess children's test-taking behaviors. Journal of School Psychology, 38, 469—475.
79.
Oh, H.-J., Glutting, J.J., & McDermott, P.A. (1999). An epidemiological cohort study of DAS processing speed factor: How well does it identify current achievement and behavior problems?Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment , 17, 362—375.
80.
Paige, R. (2002). Welcome letter—No child left behind. Retrieved June 3, 2002, from U.S. Department of Education Web site, http://www.ed.gov/nclb/overview/welcome/index.html
81.
Reiss, D., & Price, R.H. (1996). National research agenda for prevention research: The National Institute of Mental Health report. The American Psychologist, 51, 1109— 1115.
82.
Reynolds, C.R. (1984). Critical measurement issues in learning disabilities . The Journal of Special Education, 18, 451—476.
83.
Riccio, C.A., Cohen, M.J., Hall, J., & Ross, C.M. (1997). The third and fourth factors of the WISC-III: What they don't measure. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment , 15, 27—39.
84.
Rispens, J., Swaab, H., van den Oord, E.J.C.G., Cohen-Kettenis, P., van Engeland, H., & van Yperen, T. (1997). WISC profiles in child psychiatric diagnosis: Sense or nonsense?Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 1587—1594.
85.
Roeser, R.W., Eccles, J.S., & Stroebel, K.R. (1998). Linking the study of schooling and mental health: Selected issues and empirical illustration at the level of the individual. Educational Psychologist, 33, 153—176.
86.
Sattler, J.M. (2000). Assessment of children: Cognitive application (4th ed.). San Diego: Author.
87.
Schaefer, B.A. (2004). A demographic survey of learning behaviors among American students. School Psychology Review, 33, 481—497.
88.
Schaefer, B.A., & McDermott, P.A. (1999). Learning behavior and intelligence as explanations for children's scholastic achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 299—313.
89.
Scarr, S. (1997). Behavior genetic and socialization theories of intelligence: Truce and reconciliation. In R. J. Sternberg & E. G. Rigorenko (Eds.), Intelligence, heredity, and environment (pp. 3—41). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
90.
Siegel, L.S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469—478.
91.
Siegel, L.S. (1990). IQ and learning disabilities: RIP. In H. L. Swanson & B. K. Keogh (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Theoretical and research issues (pp. 111—128). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
92.
Siegel, L.S. (1999). Issues in the definition and diagnosis of learning disabilities: A perspective on Guckenberger v. Boston University. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 304—319.
93.
Siegel, L.S. (2003). Basic cognitive processes and reading disabilities . In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 158—181). New York : Guilford.
94.
Silver, C.H., Pennett, D., Black, J.L., Fair, G.W., & Balise, R.R. (1999). Stability of learning disability subtypes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 108—119.
95.
Snow, R.E. (1986). Individual differences and the design of educational programs. The American Psychologist, 41, 1029—1039.
96.
Spitz, H.H. (1986). The raising of intelligence: A selected history of attempts to raise retarded intelligence. Hilldale, NJ : Erlbaum.
97.
Spreen, O., & Haaf, R.G. (1986). Empirically derived learning disability subtypes: A replication attempt and longitudinal patterns over 15 years. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 170—180.
98.
Stanovich, K.E. (1999). The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 350—361.
99.
Sternberg, R.L., & Grigorenko, E.L. (2002). Difference scores in the identification of children with learning disabilities: It's time to use a different method. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 65—83.
100.
Stokes, M.E., Davis, C.S., & Koch, G.G. (1995). Categorical data analysis using the SAS system . Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Stott, D.H. (1981). The Flying Start Learning-to-Learn kits. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
103.
Stott, D.H., McDermott, P.A., Green, L.F., & Francis, J.M. (1988). Learning Behaviors Scale and Study of Children's Learning Behaviors research edition manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
104.
Swanson, H.L. (1988). Toward a metatheory of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 196—209.
105.
Swanson, J.W., Borum, R., Swartz, M.S., & Monohan, J. (1996). Psychotic symptoms and disorders and the risk of violent behaviour in the community. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 6, 309—329.
Thorndike, R.L. (1963). The concepts of over-and underachievement. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, Bureau of Publications.
108.
Tighe, E.A., McDermott, P.A., & Grim, S.M. (2001, April). The multiple relationships among health and environmental risk factors and school adjustment: A longitudinal investigation of urban elementary students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
109.
Torgesen, J.K. (1991). Learning disabilities: Historical and conceptual issues. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (pp. 3—37). San Diego : Academic Press.
110.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (1990). Current population survey. Washington, DC: Author.
111.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (1992). Current population survey, March 1992. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.
112.
Ward, S.B., Ward, T.J., Hatt, C.V., Young, D.L., & Mollner, N.R. (1995). The incidence and utility of the ACID, ACIDS, and SCAD profiles in a referred population. Psychology in the Schools, 32, 267—276.
113.
Watkins, M.W. (1996). Diagnostic utility of the WISC-III developmental index as a predictor of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 305—312.
114.
Watkins, M.W. (1999). Diagnostic utility of WISC-III subtest variability among students with learning disabilities. CanadianJournal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 11—20.
115.
Watkins, M.W., & Canivez, G.L. (1997). Interrater agreement of the Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents. Diagnostique, 22, 205—213.
116.
Watkins, M.W., & Canivez, G.L. (2004). Temporal stability of WISC-III subtest composite: Strengths and weaknesses. Psychological Assessment, 16, 133—138.
117.
Watkins, M.W., Kush, J.C., & Glutting, J.J. (1997). Prevalence and diagnostic utility of the WISC-III SCAD profile among children with disabilities. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 235—248.
118.
Weiss, A., & Fantuzzo, J.W. (2001). Multivariate impact of health and caretaking risk factors on the school adjustment of first graders . Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 141—160.
119.
Weiss, G., & Hechtman, L. (1993). Hyperactive children grown up (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
120.
Weiler, M.D., Harris, N.S., Marcus, D.J., Bellinger, D., Kosslyn, S.M., & Walker, D.P. (2000). Speed of information processing in children referred for learning problems: Performance on a visual filtering test. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 538—550.
121.
Wilson, L.R., & Cone, T. (1984). The regression equation method for determining academic discrepancy. Journal of School Psychology, 22, 95—110.
122.
Wolber, G.J., & Carne, W.F. (2002). Writing psychological reports: A guide for clinicians (2nd ed.). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
123.
Worrell, F.C., Vandiver, B.J., & Watkins, M.W. (2001). Construct validity of the Learning Behavior Scale with an independent sample of students. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 207—215.
124.
Wright, R.E. (1995). Logistic regression. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 217—244). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
125.
Yen, C.-J., Konold, T.R., & McDermott, P.A. (2004). Does learning behavior augment cognitive ability as an indicator of academic achievement?Journal of School Psychology, 42, 157—169.
126.
Youngstrom, E.A., Kogos, J.L., & Glutting, J.J. (1999). Incremental efficacy of Differential Ability Scales factor scores in predicting individual achievement criteria. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 26—39.
