Results are reported for an exploratory study of eligibility decisions made for 21 Spanish-speaking English language learners (ELLs) with learning disabilities (LD) and no secondary disabilities who received special education support in reading. Eligibility determinations by an expert panel resulted in decisions that differed significantly from those of school multidisciplinary teams. The panel agreed that some students appeared to have reading-related LD (n = 5) but also identified students that they believed had disabilities, but not necessarily reading-related LD (n = 6). Another group of students (n = 10) had learning problems that the panel believed could be attributed to factors other than LD or for whom substantive additional data would be required to validate eligibility. Issues associated with referral, assessment, and eligibility determinations for ELLs are discussed, and recommendations for improving practice are offered, with an emphasis on the importance of linking data from multiple sources when deciding whether ELLs qualify for special education.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amori, B.A., & Dalton, H. (1996). IDEA oral proficiency test. Whittier, CA: Ballard & Tighe.
2.
Artiles, A. J., & Ortiz, A. (Eds.). (2002). English language learners with special needs: Identification, placement, and instruction. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
3.
Artiles, A.J., Rueda, R., Salazar, I., & Higareda, J. (2002). English-language learner representation in special education in California urban school districts. In D. J. Losen & G. Orfield (Eds.), Racial inequality in special education (pp. 117— 136). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
4.
Brown, L., Sherbenou, R.J., & Johnson, S.K. (1990). Test of nonverbal intelligence (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
Donovan, S., & Cross, C. (Eds.). (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7.
Ellis, W., & Cramer, S.C. (1994). Learning disabilities: A national responsibility report of the Summit on Learning Disabilities in Washington, DC. September 20—21. New York: National Center for Learning Disabilities.
8.
Fletcher, J.M., Lyon, G.R., Barnes, M., Stuebing, K.K., Francis, D.J., Olson, R.K., et al. (2002). Classification of learning disabilities: An evidence-based evaluation. In R. Bradley , L. Danielson, D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 185—261). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Garcia, S.B., & Guerra, P.L. (2004). Deconstructing deficit thinking: Working with educators to create more equitable learning environments. Education and Urban Society, 36(2), 150—168.
10.
Garcia, S.B., & Ortiz, A.A. (1988). Preventing inappropriate referrals of language minority students to special education (New Focus No. 5). Wheaton, MD: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education .
11.
Gottlieb, J., Alter, M., Gottlieb, B.W., & Wishner, J. (1994). Special education in urban America: It's not justifiable for many. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 453—465.
12.
Gresham, F.M. (2002). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In R. Bradley, L. Danielson , & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 467—519). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
Hammill, D., Pearson, N.A., & Wiederholt, J.L. (1996). Comprehensive test of nonverbal intelligence. Austin, TX : PRO-ED.
14.
Heubert, J. P., & Hauser, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, P.L. 102-119, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
16.
Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (1983). Kaufman assessment battery for children. Circle Pines, MN: AGS.
17.
Kindler, A.L. (2002). Survey of the states' limited English proficient students and available educational programs and services. 2001— 2002 summary report. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Educational Programs.
Leung, B.P. (1996). Quality assessment practices in a diverse society . Teaching Exceptional Children, 28(3), 42—45.
20.
MacMillan, D.L., Gresham, F.M., Siperstein, G.N., & Bocian, K.M. (1996). The labyrinth of IDEA: School decisions on referred students with subaverage general intelligence. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 101, 161—174.
21.
MacMillan, D.L., & Siperstein, G.N. (2002). Learning disabilities as operationally defined by schools. In R. Bradley , L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice (pp. 287—333). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
Microsoft Corp. (1993—1994 ). Microsoft Excel users' guide, Version 5. Richmond, WA: Author.
23.
Ortiz, A.A. (1997). LD occurring concomitantly with linguistic differences . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 321—332.
24.
Ortiz, A.A. (2002). Prevention and early intervention. In A. J. Artiles & A. A. Ortiz (Eds.), English language learners with special education needs: Identification, assessment, and instruction (pp. 31—48). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems.
25.
Ortiz, A.A., Garcia, S.B., Holtzman, W.H., Jr. , Polyzoi, E., Snell, W.E., Jr., Wilkinson , C.Y., et al. (1985). Characteristics of limited English proficient Hispanic students served in programs for the learning disabled: Implications for policy, practice and research. Austin: University of Texas, Handicapped Minority Research Institute on Language Proficiency.
26.
Ortiz, A.A., & Graves, A. (2001). English language learners with literacy-related learning disabilities. In International Dyslexia Association commemorative booklet (pp. 31—35). Baltimore: International Dyslexia Association.
27.
Ortiz, A.A., & Kushner, M.I. (1997). Bilingualism and the possible impact on academic performance. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 6, 657—679.
28.
Ortiz, A.A., & Wilkinson, C.Y. (1991). Assessment and intervention model for the bilingual exceptional student (AIM for the BEST). Teacher Education and Special Education, 14, 35—42.
29.
Rock, M.L., & Zigmond, N. (2001). Intervention assistance: Is it substance or symbolism?Preventing School Failure, 45(4), 153—161.
30.
Texas Education Agency. (2002). Chapter 89. Adaptations for special populations. Sub-chapter AA. Commissioner's rules concerning special education services (Section 89.1040. Eligibility criteria). Austin, TX: Author.
31.
Valencia, R.R., & Villarreal, B.J. (2005). Texas' second wave of high-stakes testing: Anti-social promotion, legislation, grade retention, and adverse impact on minorities. In A. Valenzuela (Ed.), Leaving children behind: How “Texas-style” accountability fails Latino youth (pp. 113—152). Albany: State University of New York Press.
32.
Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
Zehler, A.M., Fleischman, H.F., Hopstock, P.J., Pendzick, M.L., & Stephenson, T.G. (2003). Descriptive study of services to LEP students and LEP students with disabilities: Special Topic Report #4-Findings on special education LEP students. Arlington, VA: Development Associates.
38.
Zehler, A.M., Fleischman, H.F., Hopstock, P.J., Stephenson, T.G., Pendzick, M.L., & Sapru, S. (2003). Descriptive study of services to LEP students and LEP students with disabilities. Volume I: Research Report. Arlington, VA: Development Associates.
